I'm sorry I did not see your prior post myself, and I repeated the same question to you!
Do you recall if the Art88 is in any way more neutral or more "objective" sounding than the GAT S2? Putting the same question a different way, is the Art88 "cooler" or "warmer" in the midrange than the GAT S2?
Do you recall if the treble frequencies of the GAT S2 or of the Art88 were more extended or more pronounced?
Thank you!
WOOF WOOF!
No worries at all Ron, happy to answer that.
The ART88 is far more neutral in all aspects. It virtually disappears, simply gets out of the way! They say, the best preamp is no preamp!
So, what the ART88 does is receives your source signals in its purest form (retains the phase inversion) upon the Input stage, and preserves that phase inversion right throughout the Output stage (using tubes, not SS buffered). Therefore, I would say that the midrange and not only the mids but also highs and LF detail, sounds far more natural. As if you're that much closer to the real instrument rather than just an ordinary recording. With the SS buffered output stages, there's a slight boost in performance. As if engaging in a turbo boost sort of drive... there's a kick in the performance- reference to volume levels.
Speaking of the recording, I sincerely believe that with the ART88 and its installation in any highend system, the limitations at this level are found on the recording itself. Playback a mediocre recording, you'll get mediocre performance. Playback a high quality recording or recordings done with utmost finesse/ precision (eg. ECM labels) and you'll get a supreme performance!
The GATS2 is a fantastic preamp (Linestage) and so is the GAT S1, there's no denying that!
I wouldn't label them as cooler vs warmer... but they're Sonic signature is quite different, solely due to the fact that they use SS buffered output stages, like every other CJ preamp. So, this design circuit may be termed as a "hybrid" tube circuit that uses the best of both decives (tubes & SS). Whereas, the ART88 is concerned, it's an all tube design, no SS devices along the main signal paths whatsoever.
The other thing worth noting: I had the opportunity to audition the ART88 at length on two different types of systems, and also home trialled the GAT (S1 & S2) with my own system on my CLX's. I found that GAT series preamps offered more of a neutral sound, further inching away from CJ's Premier, ACT2, CT5 and ET series preamps, which all have a specific CJ signature to them. The ART88 is the one that elevated the performance into a far more neutral platform, well away from any of CJ's finest preamps and any of their previous top of the line series.
This is why I've mentioned it in my previous post (#57); the ART88 meets my personal benchmark in improvement of 40%. By comparison of the earlier series, this 40% is easily determined. There's no doubt about it. It is one hell of a preamp! It doesn't look that fancy, very minimal parts in there, with the simplest of tube circuit design, which stems all the way back from the Classic tube circuits based in 50's/60's. It's a proven design consisting of Class A circuits, and CJ never deviated from this base circuit.
They've always maintained true value close to the heart of all their tube gear, shortest signal paths, minimal parts, simplest circuits with very high quality parts. The ART series amplifiers is the very essence of all that, and it's simply marvellous!
Hope that helps. Cheers mate,
RJ