What are we comparing? I thought I was just getting a reading to see what my perceived "very loud" measures in decibels. You guys hitting 120+ peaks. What kinds of amps are you using?
Tim
Tim
Atmasphere said, "I used to have a meter until it got stolen." And this classic, "While I don't have a meter for now, at least I have used one."
I too used to have a spl meter till my dog ate it. Now I cant tell how loud my woofer is!
Oh yeah! And the dog ate my homework. (Oh, Sister Mary Margaret forgive me for that one)
Wendell
Felonious Punk asked, What are we comparing? I guess we are comparing how loud we can crank it up. Atmasphere said he listens to Black sabbath at 115db. I don't have a copy of that lp so i put on my favorite lp and cranked it up. I did not hear any distortion or added brightness. So I guess just whatever you want to listen to loud.
Wendell
Yes, to me what would be interesting would be for each person to set the given musical track to 2 volume settings: The normal everyday listening level, and the "sometimes I play it louder when no one's home" level. Take the readings for each (A-wtd slow would be my preference for this purpose).What are we comparing? I thought I was just getting a reading to see what my perceived "very loud" measures in decibels.
What app do you have?Atmasphere said, "I have a sound pressure meter app on my Iphone but it does not show peaks or anything more than 110db.
The trick here is that they question- does it *sound* loud at these sound pressures (+95db)? It shouldn't."
My Iphone meter goes to 130db.
Does it sound loud at 95db+? Sure it does, because it is loud! I don't get it, Ralph, when does your system start to sound loud? At some point it has to sound loud, because it is loud.
When you say you listen to black Sabbath at 115db is that at the same volume setting on your preamp as say Eva Cassidy? Or do you crank up the volume control to listen to it for a short period of time?
Wendell
From what I understand the iphone limits at 105db. That is why I've not really tried to use it as a SPL meter.
Wendell, I'm not sure which are rhetorical and which are real. I apologize- could your restate them here?
When I listen "moderately loud" the peaks (RS meter Cwtd fast) are 80 dB. So to me, 95 dB would in fact be really loud.
Just to say that "really loud" is uncalibrated.:b
Wendell, are you using slow or fast? I assume C wtg. But those of us with "ample" bass may be getting a rather different reading than others without such good bass capability that does not correlate well with loudness impression. When it comes to hearing the distortion products we're discussing in this thread, I would submit A-wtg would be more relevant.
Also, what's the crest factor of your favorite album? The impression of loudness may vary significantly among recordings with "the same" peak SPL readings.
If we really want to compare loudness of our various systems, it would be best for us to all use the same recording and the same metering. For the song, it does not have to be an esoteric recording. Just something we might all have on hand and set its loudness to match our nominal listening level. For metering, I'd suggest A-wtg, slow, to remove the bass uncertainty and make reading the level more consistent. Then we'd have a shot at apples-to-apples comparisons (notwithstanding that none of these Radio Shack or iPhone SPL meters are what could be called calibrated).
I would find that information very interesting. Anyone want to suggest a recording?
Yes, to me what would be interesting would be for each person to set the given musical track to 2 volume settings: The normal everyday listening level, and the "sometimes I play it louder when no one's home" level. Take the readings for each (A-wtd slow would be my preference for this purpose).
^^ My app does that too.
In a smaller room, with that much power and peaks around 95db is as loud as you want to play? FWIW I have found that to be the practical limit beyond which most audiophile will not venture if odd ordered content is a problem. I think I mentioned that a few pages earlier on this thread.
What is happening is the odd ordered content is being translated by your ear/brain system to 'as loud as I care to listen'. Its likely that your equipment is only making a few watts unless your speakers are very inefficient. FWIW with most push pull amps (tube or solid state), there is a power level below which distortion actually increases rather than decreases. If your system is too overpowered, the amps may never ascend above that level- so sometimes it is possible to get better sound (re.: smoother, more detailed) with a slightly lower-powered amplifier.
What happens when you remove the odd ordered harmonic content is that thoughts about volume vanish, except in the context of how it relates to the musical performance itself. IOW I'm sure you've noticed that its possible to play an acoustic guitar too soft or too loud- there is a correct volume that has it sounding as real as it can with any system.
^^ I've always looked to the music itself for that, but sheesh, these days you go to shows and its way too loud- hearing loss is a whole 'nuther animal!
Well, like I said, it could be negative feedback. It could also be that it is simply loud enough for me. I can tell you that in my small room it is loud enough to render conversation impossible, and not just at peaks. And remember, this is a nearfield system - active monitors with 6.5" mid bass drivers and no subs. So I'm hitting peaks in the mid 90s with no real bass. I suppose it is interesting, theoretically, that there may be a way to avoid a specific distortion at volumes beyond what is healthy for any sustained period of time, but it doesn't matter much. Permissible exposure time for 115 db is < 15 seconds. For an average of 91db, it's 2 hours. Prolonged exposure in the mid 80s is enough to do damage. If my negative feedback is telling me that peaks in the mid 90s are "loud enough," I suspect it is probably doing me a favor. YMMV.
Tim