Exactly. There are numerous ways to do this.
Looking at the characteristics this is the type of panel I would not use at first reflection points for stereo - they seem to have almost 100% absorption over 500 Hz and only 50% at 250 Hz.
It has always been my understanding that HF absorption (500hz +) is what's desirable at point of first reflection.
A naive question - considering a rectangular room a large bass trap could be built in the back wall? Or its performance will be better if located at the front wall?
Not naïve at all. The answers is both walls. If a wall could be built to absorb 100 percent of the sound at all bass frequencies, over the entire wall area, then doing only the rear wall might be acceptable. But in practice bass traps are best placed in as many locations as one can manage. Further, unless the speakers are built into the front wall, their rear radiation at low frequencies will hit that wall causing peaks and nulls. So that's another reason to treat both walls.
--Ethan
---Micro, Congrats in reaching 3,000 posts!
Bob,
And still a lot to say and to learn ...
It is a fantastic hobby!
Micro, would you mind posting the RT60 graph from these results as well?
I will do it later today.
Now, a challenge for the experts in decay time analysis. The two attached pictures show measurements made with REW using a Behringer ECM8000. The room is 31 x 13 x 8 feet . Can you comment on them?