Corner Bass Traps - Always beneficial?

Exactly. There are numerous ways to do this.

DSC_1691_1024.JPG

What type of traps are being used at point of first reflection on the side wall in this picture? They look very interesting. Is this a type of absorption/diffusion combo trap? How deep are they? Thanks,ML
 
It has always been my understanding that HF absorption (500hz +) is what's desirable at point of first reflection.

The type of treatment at first reflection points will depend on your preferences, but if you want to have absorption it should be uniform along the whole spectrum over the transition zone. F. Toole refers to this subject in his book, and several of our experts also have debated it in a previous thread more than one year ago.
 
A naive question - considering a rectangular room a large bass trap could be built in the back wall? Or its performance will be better if located at the front wall?

Not naïve at all. The answers is both walls. If a wall could be built to absorb 100 percent of the sound at all bass frequencies, over the entire wall area, then doing only the rear wall might be acceptable. But in practice bass traps are best placed in as many locations as one can manage. Further, unless the speakers are built into the front wall, their rear radiation at low frequencies will hit that wall causing peaks and nulls. So that's another reason to treat both walls.

--Ethan
 
Not naïve at all. The answers is both walls. If a wall could be built to absorb 100 percent of the sound at all bass frequencies, over the entire wall area, then doing only the rear wall might be acceptable. But in practice bass traps are best placed in as many locations as one can manage. Further, unless the speakers are built into the front wall, their rear radiation at low frequencies will hit that wall causing peaks and nulls. So that's another reason to treat both walls.

--Ethan

Thanks!
 
Now, a challenge for the experts in decay time analysis. The two attached pictures show measurements made with REW using a Behringer ECM8000. The room is 31 x 13 x 8 feet . Can you comment on them?
 

Attachments

  • aa1.jpg
    aa1.jpg
    107.5 KB · Views: 301
  • aa2.jpg
    aa2.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 300
I will do it later today.

Thanks, Just curious.

Here is the response (both speakers together) I got in my room, along with the RT-60. Looks like I have a couple of nasty nulls, and that my room is a little over damped.

bothch500.jpg

measure02.jpg

Edit: I do have the 8 RealTraps I mentioned earlier in this thread, on order. So, it will be interesting to see what they contribute.
 
Last edited:
Now, a challenge for the experts in decay time analysis. The two attached pictures show measurements made with REW using a Behringer ECM8000. The room is 31 x 13 x 8 feet . Can you comment on them?

It looks like a room. :D

Seriously, the decay times aren't terrible except for the lowest two modes. Fortunately, most music has little if any energy at 35 Hz, and probably nothing at 18 Hz. If this room also serves as a theater, the extra oomph at 18 Hz could be seen as a plus!

--Ethan
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu