The partisanship and defensiveness on DACs appears to me subjectively to be more extreme than the partnership on other components. I wonder why this is?
I just thought of a hypothesis: maybe the subjective sonic differences between DACs are smaller and more difficult to discern than are the subjective sonic differences between other types of components, and so people feel more emotionally compelled to defend their expensive choice?
no one is claiming he was intentional about not cleaning up his compare to like for like, just lazy and careless. especially that he was using price as his basis for compare. and all he needed to say was hey, you are right, i should have been more careful. but he just was in denial and that it was ok.I enjoy reading about uber gear and why people purchase. The reason I still read WBF. But I guess my question to all of Ron's fanboys is this: does anyone really believe he intentionally provided misleading price information? If not, why all the angst? He's human just like everyone else. And humans make unintentional mistakes. Just trying to understand. Best.
I totally agree with this.a tape machine cannot be listened to 24/7/365 with new content constantly. it's a product for a different occasional use case. the media issue is huge for tape.
did you read my response to you? i was clear about my view that Ron had no conscious intention or nefarious feelings to miss the like for like nuances of the price compare.ML. I don't know what his motivations are. If you do please share. I do agree that when people make mistakes, intentional or otherwise, they should admit it and move. Sadly, that's not the world we live in today and admitting fault is becoming rare. Why is this? A very complex topic.
Ron has not got a nefarious bone in his body, and all who know him personally and professionally will attest to that - enough said!did you read my response to you? i was clear about my view that Ron had no conscious intention or nefarious feelings to miss the like for like nuances of the price compare.
no one is claiming he was intentional about not cleaning up his compare to like for like, just lazy and careless. especially that he was using price as his basis for compare. and all he needed to say was hey, you are right, i should have been more careful. but he just was in denial and that it was ok.
i did go back to read Ron's replies to see whether he did own up to missing on the details. i could not find where he did that specifically. he did agree with @Audiocrack 's post so maybe that got close.
Isn't this thread about the flagship DCS?
Ron brought the Wadax into this particular segment and back and forth of this thread.Isn't this thread about the flagship DCS? Wouldn't that then merit calling out the flagship Wadax. Or the flagship Taiko/Lampizator setup.
no. entry level Wadax is $49k for the Studio Player.....including a transport and streamer and volume control.If Ron were to call out the entry level $250,000 WADAX, he would then be comparing it to a $20k-$30K DCS. We would be talking lower than Vivaldi? Correct?
but that is exactly what he did. make cost ( comparative price) the issue.I don't see it as Ron's responsibility to In all of his post to call out the entire product line, price of each piece, just to make some point unrelated to the cost.
Sorry but this is just a stupid reaction. Nobody is claiming (in any case not me) that Ron has some kind of hidden agen
OK. That's fair. I took his point, however, to be bigger than that. I thought it was that , to him, spending large sums of money on digital did not equate to large improvements in sound. I agree that he should have been more careful with his figures. But if the rep did indeed tell him that then the rep is actually to blame. A professional journalist should of course fact check him but I understand him not doing so in this informal forum. .the point is not whether Ron likes the Wadax, or he hates it. or even his value judgment. not everyone will see the value in any product. the problem is throwing a number out to make his point without doing his homework. then blaming it on the Wadax rep.
Actually it's not "stupid" I did not claim you said that he was biased but one poster literally called him out as a Taiko shill. Please be more thoughtful in your responses to me. I have an open mind and am willing to listen to any reasonable criticism of me or my comments. It's fair to criticize Ron for not getting the number right.Sorry but this is just a stupid reaction. Nobody is claiming (in any case not me) that Ron has some kind of hidden agenda.
wow we agree LOLIMO vegetarians writing about steak restaurants will always trigger extreme comments. Particularly when addressing Michelin starred restaurants.
I would ask why you raised the question and fight about prices on the dCS Varese thread, but never on the also popular and long lasting Taiko or Wadax threads.
IMO wrong - the subjective sonic differences between DACs are of fundamental nature and easily discernible in an adequate system if you manage to forget focusing on the missing vinyl artifacts . But as in anything related to high-end, it all depends on listener capability to appreciate them and using the proper recordings if needing to do it in a reasonable time in systems we are not familiar.
BTW, don't expect to listen to them in shows.
39800 is the priceRon brought the Wadax into this particular segment and back and forth of this thread.
no. entry level Wadax is $49k for the Studio Player.....including a transport and streamer and volume control.
but that is exactly what he did. make cost ( comparative price) the issue.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |