Ack: Are these real questions or are they just retorical? And to whom are you addressing them?
They are real and addressed to you: What is really going on inside the Typhon with the hot and the neutral? How are they connected.
The Typhon is what we say it is and works the way we say it works.
RE: Your question about a connection between the hot and neutral.
I don't understand your confusion. You obviously would not connect the hot and neutral because it would create a dead short and blow the circuit breaker. If you don't understand something, how about being more specific and detailed in what you are confused about because you seem like a smart guy and I am sure that is not what you meant.
Sorry for not being clear... "connected" doesn't mean shorted (two things could be connected by a resistor, for example). But let me try again: are the hot and neutral _somehow_ connected to each other inside the Typhon? Is there, say, an extremely high value resistor between them (100Gohm??? just to make up the value), that the measuring equipment simply cannot measure? I have no doubt anyone can repeat your results, but from this vantage point you seem to be measuring two things that are completely disjointed and unrelated to each other, therefore, of course there would be no LCR.
The patent claims:
"A power wire conductor passes axially through the center of the hollow conductive tube. The power wire is electrically bonded at only a single point within the tube. The wire may be connected at any point within the tube, but the preferred location is generally at a center point along the longitudinal length along the interior surface of the tube. The power wire should be insulated along its length within the tube so as to prevent contact with the tube at any point other than the desired contact point, but the insulation is removed at the electrically conductive contact point (a bonding point). When constructed in this manner, the hollow tube is not an actual conductor; rather, the tube defines a chamber that radiates an electromagnetic field within its hollow core. In the context of this invention, emphasis must be placed on the electric field component of the electromagnetic field. Therefore, the hollow tube may be considered and described as an electric field chamber."
It's not entirely clear, but this tells me the hot is simply electrically connected to its own NIC in the middle of the NIC, similarly the neutral is "bonded" to its own NIC, and otherwise there is no connection of any sort between the wires and/or the NICs. Fine, we can easily then understand there couldn't possibly be any measurable LCR characteristics between hot and neutral because they are simply not connected, and you don't need an elaborate video to prove it; in that case, I find the approach in the video not valid from an engineering perspective - we tend to measure things that are somehow connected (related) to each other, not unrelated things.
Fair enough. I scraped this picture from the net - does it accurately depict the Typhon?
What I see is a ground wire from the IEC connector to the chassis, and a hot + neutral from the IEC into their own NICs. I assume the circuits you mention are in the NICs; I saw no mention of a circuit in the patent, but it is what it is. I intend to get a Typhon and open it up. I need to assess value for the asking price, while I take it at face value that it reduces noise. I actually love the fact it's a parallel filter with allegedly no other electrical impact; but I need to figure out whether it would somehow suffer from current suck-out effect during high demands.
Thanks
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Peter
I can tell you that there are no suck outs during high demands
Of course the tests are relevant. When you are demonstrating a principle feature of the product which is its non-reactance - the tests that were demonstrated are the EXACT tests that you would run to demonstrate the lack of reactance.
What I can't understand is how it can suck the hiss out of Steve's tubes.
For you to have a chance at a measurement you would have to measure between the bonding point inside the NIC and the other side of the the absorbing material which in this case I would assume is the ground terminal which you did not test.
Rob
Coming to the party late. Regarding the hiss that the cable removes , does this hiss return when the cable is removed ?
Al
Caelin,
A couple of questions.
Would it make sense to create a 'large' Typhon that goes parallel to the mains coming into the breaker box? Sort of an audiophile circuit breaker box that cleans all the circuits so that individual Typhons are not needed.
Also, is the effect of Typhons cumulative; if one works would two be better?
Thanks.
Fair enough. I scraped this picture from the net - does it accurately depict the Typhon?
What I see is a ground wire from the IEC connector to the chassis, and a hot + neutral from the IEC into their own NICs. I assume the circuits you mention are in the NICs; I saw no mention of a circuit in the patent, but it is what it is. I intend to get a Typhon and open it up. I need to assess value for the asking price, while I take it at face value that it reduces noise. I actually love the fact it's a parallel filter with allegedly no other electrical impact; but I need to figure out whether it would somehow suffer from current suck-out effect during high demands.
Thanks
Perhaps in your system, with high efficiency speakers. Personally, I always ask - where's the catch; usually, you gain some but give up something else. Free lunch?