Eye Candy

It's the one vacuum sub-platter I don't have (I don't have any of the non vacuums). I bet eventually, I'll get one. :D

With the vacuum hold down engaged the LP essentially becomes a 30,150 to 30,200 gram LP. LOL.
 
Who could blame you for that, Jack.:)

I do wonder if the sound of your turntable wouldn't be more "correct" (I know it is a dangerous term to use around audiophiles) if you had opted for the acrylic sub-platter rather than one of the two heavier alternatives. I have no doubt that all three provide very different sonic results, all excellent by anyone's definition, as should be expected given the asking price.

According to TechDAS, the acrylic platter provides a softer more forgiving sound. The duralumin platter is more balanced and the SS platter more dynamic. I have the SS upper platter on order to complement my duralumin option. I will not be seeking acrylic for this turntable.
 
Funny, you would expect that the higher you go in terms of $$$ spent the closer you should come to the "ideal" sound of music. However it seems that there are always tradeoffs and at higher $$$ values the designers have favored one over the other. This results in a flavoring preference due to materials, construction techniques, etc. So high $$$ components (OK, most all components regardless of price) don't always sound the same when reaching for the ideal sound as you might expect at first.

I know a purchaser should always try out a component before making a decision, if that is possible. And at higher $$$ spent it would be stupid not to do that, but it certainly becomes very difficult when the rarity of these components and the small number of dealers carrying them in stock are taken into consideration. And show conditions, being what they are, are not a great place to do this, but that may be the only available possibility to many of us. And none of that is a guarantee of how it is going to perform at home in your own system.
 
Sperling TT. So pretty
image.jpg
 
Funny, you would expect that the higher you go in terms of $$$ spent the closer you should come to the "ideal" sound of music. However it seems that there are always tradeoffs and at higher $$$ values the designers have favored one over the other. This results in a flavoring preference due to materials, construction techniques, etc. So high $$$ components (OK, most all components regardless of price) don't always sound the same when reaching for the ideal sound as you might expect at first.

I know a purchaser should always try out a component before making a decision, if that is possible. And at higher $$$ spent it would be stupid not to do that, but it certainly becomes very difficult when the rarity of these components and the small number of dealers carrying them in stock are taken into consideration. And show conditions, being what they are, are not a great place to do this, but that may be the only available possibility to many of us. And none of that is a guarantee of how it is going to perform at home in your own system.

I'm not so sure that I agree. I would suggest that the neutrality of the table is allowing you to hear more of the flavor of the cartridge and to a much larger extent now in my experience, the colorations of the phono stage.
 
I'm not so sure that I agree. I would suggest that the neutrality of the table is allowing you to hear more of the flavor of the cartridge and to a much larger extent now in my experience, the colorations of the phono stage.

You could be right about higher $$$ tables being more neutral overall. However, I was including all components in my statement ... amps, cartridges, speakers, et al.
 
pioneer-turntable-gearjunkies_com.jpg

pioneer table.jpg
 
I will host a Calypso Reference this week-end - it is the one shown in the picture. Fortunately I am now using the Oracle Premier - both speak French and have a family look, I do not expect big fights ...

Would love to hear about the shoot out between the CALYPSO REF versus the ORACLE.

CHEERS, ....T
 
Did Pioneer clone the 1200 or did they take over from National Panasonic/Technics?

Good question?

I don't think Pioneer would have built any production line themselves, so either using Panasonic's production line or China like the cheap Audio technica's. Japan is stil pretty good at sharing manufacturing. Considering Pioneer still service Exclusive turntables in Japan, there is expertise there to improve the 1200.

time will tell, but they will never be back to the glory days. I do like the look thou :p


5539433415_4969eba8df_b.jpg

4109544646_178bcf9020_b.jpg

4108801981_12664d07f1_b.jpg

4205888402_c1299759e6_b.jpg
 
1958500_830631036963104_1077308546_n.jpg1901689_830634053629469_1023349500_n.jpg1977082_830636353629239_756403663_n.jpg1016472_830676730291868_805695308_n.jpg1922419_832977410061800_1368069485_n.jpg
 
1962341_832983690061172_347325234_o.jpg1897973_832991746727033_674532163_n.jpg1795526_1453410391558743_312780332_n.jpg10003420_832984170061124_442914484_n.jpg
 
Yes but I don't think it is. I saw something on that arm on FB IIRC.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu