Many thanks for this perspective Bill. My main experience is with wood horns and I do connect with these easily. The flow with wood is the quality that I have most related to.
The Unis and Cessaros and Kodomos own horns have all struck me as a different way to go so it’s great to get your thoughts on this approach.
I am thinking I’ll consider a larger more complex horn build eventually to add to what I already have and so choice of horn material is fundamental to that. I suppose that is also why I’m subscribed to what others are doing here.
The draw to diy horns is clear and I’m only at an early stage of researching and determining which direction to go and trying to gauge what experiences are created by the various types of materials. I am looking forward to hearing more on what you are doing.
I’ll move forward with the subs project first as that is something that is under way but the call to build something else again with another set of horns is forming up inside. But I do get what you are saying about the rigidity of the horn. Birch horns in the Anima and also in my Pap horn have been the horns that I have lived with and loved most so far.
Hi Graham,
I have the same itch about the multi-way horn that I have started to scratch. 5-ways but in wood the whole way - this is clearly a big project and a lot of work but I am making good progress. Personally the multi-way horn system is imho the ultimate solution but also the easiest to cock up big time - I think it requires dedication, time and skill to get right. DSP based crossovers have made the *Objective* promise the fix this issue but I haven’t heard a pure dsp multi-way that doesn’t lose out somewhere. I think a hybrid dsp solution has much more chance and one I think can work as I have tried it a lot. There are some significant advantages (on paper) to FIR based crossover filters and a means to correct badly behaved bass in normal rooms. I am working on this right now as an alternative solution for non-purists.
Uni, Cessaro and Kodomo’s all share one thing in common - compression drivers with Be diaphragms. Uni and Kodomo both using Radian Be (amongst others since Kodomo’s is a more complex system with 5 channels I believe). Cessaros using TAD Beryllium.
Personally I think the Radians are a kind of no brainer driver due to very favourable price: performance ratio. TADs are obviously known to be king of the hill in the beryllium world but much more expensive. I think Kodomo tried TAD but stuck with Radian. I think the recent uni videos show a speaker with well integrated drivers and plenty of fidelity and insight. I think the choice of JMLC mid and Radian makes an awful lot of sense. The new reference uni 4 way coming out soon will be interesting because that will go much lower than the normal uni and has a full front firing mid bass horn so much less compromised. In terms of Cessaro - I have only heard them at shows where, being honest with you, I shrugged my shoulders as they always sounded poor. A show is a show though and I am sure like with everything else, they can be made to sound good in the right hands. I have enjoyed Tang’s journey and think his latest videos have got really good with the sub integration sorted. The Bruckner one especially sounded great.
In terms of horns voicing , my personal taste is more bottom up than top down. I prefer a big weighty mid bass anchor. I also have a serious soft spot for quite a lot of the vintage horns and their drivers.