I have one of those machines...It's not up to the task of the Techincs 1500, with Nortronics 1/2 track wired out to King Cello though.
I find that surprising since the Technics was a consumer machine and the Studer is a professional machine.
I have one of those machines...It's not up to the task of the Techincs 1500, with Nortronics 1/2 track wired out to King Cello though.
I think the King Cello is the key - I'm sure it beats the stock Studer electonicsI find that surprising since the Technics was a consumer machine and the Studer is a professional machine.
BruceAll the rest of the tape pre's I tried were quiet. Don't know why the Dehavilland picked up the RFI. The Doshi and SE King are quiet.
I have one of those machines...It's not up to the task of the Techincs 1500, with Nortronics 1/2 track wired out to King Cello though.
It's instructive to note the frequency -lol- with which Studer is regarded as a standard against which others will be compared.
I had a phone discussion with Fred Thal whom asked me about my impressions of stock Studer electronics.
I remarked there were external head amps which were sonically satisfying and superseded the stock Studer repro electronics.
He described one of the objectives for Studer was to deliver a deck that would perform exquisitely in an inhospitable environment, e.g., proximity to a broadcast transmitter/tower. The implication was Studer accomplished that objective.
I recently purchased a NOS, 1/4", 2 CH, NAB repro head. I contemplated Flux Magnetics, but elected to remain all Studer...in this case, 1.318.726.81.
people should believe their own ear, I am not sure Willie Studer did try to listen his A80 in all tubes system in that time because they don't use tube gear anymore in that time of A80, in the time of C37 with tube but the tape quality was not as good as today ( high output), also same in microphone quality much better today, inside the repro amp of A80, parts quality are not bad but we can have more better today too especially caps quality. when you shorter the sound path from head to output can have a big improve (with out board amp) if you are not to use the recording system of the deck and just for play back only
I tried the DeHavilland for a month and didn't like it. It would even pick up RFI
I think the stock Studer is an amazing machine, built like a Swiss watch, all the parts fit so well.. the machining is incredible.
I was told several years ago from the person I bought my Studer from and who was very knowledgeable in all things Studer. When I discussed with him my bypassing the internal electronics for an external tape head preamp, he said to me, "if Willie Studer wanted an external preamp for his machines he would have built one himself"
His point was how good the original internal electronics were
Hello again Mr. Bruce B.
Knowing you used high quality shielded cables attached to the DeHavilland to the tape deck, what do you think caused the problem with RFI? What were the other qualities about the DeHavilland you did not like if you would care to say? Thanks so much for your continued help.
jazzbo Bob
That is my thinking
This machine is a total system and is the approach championed by Studer.
I'm reluctant to modify considering what unintended consequence might accrue.
Paul Stubblebine indicated as much to me when I first had the privilege and pleasure of meeting him at RMAF '09.
The stock Studer electronics are pretty darn good and yes -- it can be improved.
Hi BobTony Ma mentions he has problems with RF during certain parts of the day with his tube tape head pre amp. I thought this would have much to do with the quality of cables used from the outboard tape head pre amp. I may be mistaken it would appear. RF may be confined to certain tape head pre amps? If the cables are not the culprits then what is and how can RFI be eliminated completely or at least reduced so that it's not a problem?
Bob