I received my Horizon 360 yesterday and offer these early observations. To begin, aside from the graphics and the new line-up of rear panel connectors, the unit really appears indistinguishable from the previous iterations (the original and what has been called “v1” which contains the new XDMI input on the rear panel. (This was available by two pathways; either by updating one’s original or ordering a new Horizon with the XDMI input). In order to assess the new 360, I thought it was reasonable to simply install my current tube set on the new 360 since it would allow an assessment in which the only variable was the new unit itself, and not tubes. (For the record, I run a Cossar 53KU regulator, Mullard ECC2 triodes, and P17c pentodes in mullingmrs copper wire/gold pin adapters. I am connecting the 360 to my Taiko Extreme via USB and an FTA Sinope cable.) Of course, all the caveats about break-in apply (cable terminations and tube socket annealing, capacitor charging, CMS footers re-settling and stabilizing etc.). However, the good news is that the 360, even with very little break-in time, appears to be a superior unit to its predecessor in the most fundamental way. Simply put it is a higher resolution and lower distortion device than the original that it replaces. The obvious full range sonic benefits, particularly musicality, accrue from these advances. Even though bass is often the last thing that “comes in” with cable and gear changes and I am not there yet, what I have heard thus far is impressive and suggests that even better performance awaits as break-in continues. Alternately I might say, if the bass is good now, I can hardly wait to hear this thing after it’s broken in! In short, I doubt that anyone would not be impressed with a 360 no matter how configured, based on what I have heard thus far. Lukasz did his homework and new owners will be justly rewarded by his efforts regardless of the server one uses. The pairing of the 360 with the new XDMI native output-enabled Olympus is yet another highly anticipated event and is almost too much to think about, but promises to be a hell of a ride.
Unfortunately, I am obliged to provide an additional comment about the damping (or lack of) for the top plate (in my case, copper). Frankly, I was very disappointed in the lack of damping for the top plate. Although the chassis appear to be built like a brick you-know-what, if anyone believes the top plate damping is adequate and needs no further discussion, my response is noted here:
Honestly, the top plate rattles like a metal garbage can when finger-tapped. If your unit is on an open shelf or in an open cabinet and you don’t think this matters, we’ll just have to agree to disagree. However, the detrimental effects of the poor top plate damping are almost certainly the most problematic if you play your music at volume. At lower levels, it’s probably a relatively minor issue, or no issue at all. Fortunately, this is a trivial issue and is easily addressed. I certainly haven’t exhausted every damping method that is out there, but this one worked quite well for me using 1000 gm calibration weights and sorbothane discs that are both readily available from Amazon
View attachment 135607. View attachment 135608
Sorbothane discs
https://www.amazon.com/Isolate-Sorbothane-Vibration-Isolation-Circular/dp/B0042U8P9C/ref=sr_1_6?crid=59APIGX4V7W6&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.h905hFiD4CtDomHCCo7-P4oV-Q4gpw3GLSCGGxEMetLb157JTPnVvAGLHLI_EMiY-grcaPAeVzHv98o_qlB3Mf_luE-w6y-eSD72h_u3YWT2y9VcSAp_UJ724fKyP6tNN_5sicwLeQxGLcwPqLbAlOaS-JG5SRnsBgZ09qzKK5Wq2j3iCbAFKMicnj4PpXM7DYf_1WI2pwJw14lDgN0ifA.0jiXZF13B7OhhBI2OVqhIDU_6SkibkpdjRE1iZFkD4A&dib_tag=se&keywords=sorbothane+2.25+disc&qid=1724961327&s=music&sprefix=sorbothane+2.25+disc,popular,128&sr=1-6
Calibration weights:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07HF3LXWQ?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title
I'm not sure i want an amp to be 'voiced', regardless of speakers. To me an amp should amplify and nothing else. If i want flavour i can do that with a preamp or dac. i would like to understand more why you feel that the best amp for the Tobians is a tube amp? Although i am now looking at the nagra 300 as a possibility which seems to be pretty special.@steve williams - those are with Your speakers Steve.
With horns and 100dB sensitivity which were voiced with 300b tubes those kinds of amps are optimal vs SS.
I won't "spam" a topic related to the H360 with amp/speaker topic so i will send you PMI'm not sure i want an amp to be 'voiced', regardless of speakers. To me an amp should amplify and nothing else. If i want flavour i can do that with a preamp or dac. i would like to understand more why you feel that the best amp for the Tobians is a tube amp? Although i am now looking at the nagra 300 as a possibility which seems to be pretty special.
He can try it both ways, I might set the (360) 50-55 then see what the integrated does...Apparently, the output level on H360 is quite "hotter" than on the H1 hence you observe what you wrote. In my experience I never noted any diff if I used H on the levels below 63 - tbh I use it as a volume control as my DHT pre does not have a remote and I'm lazy to do it manually each single time.
But this anyhow you can check on your own. Set the level on Levante on desired level and play with the output on the H360.
I totally agree that the dynamics are huge such that I too found myself having to dial back the gain on my preamp. Im one of those guys who prefer the Horizon gain at 63 as that passes the full signal and then I control what @John T discusses. with my preamp. Since I received the original Horizon the gain on. my Lamm preamp has typically been at the 5th lowest detente position. Since receiving the H360 I found myself immediately down to the 4th lowest and after two weeks of settle in I am now at the 3rd lowest detente position on my preamp. I did try keep the preamp gain at 4-5 and dialing back on the H360 to 57-58 but to my ears I was missing some of the energy that came with leaving it at 63 so thats where I am again. My understanding is this perceived increase in dynamics is actually greater with H360 users listening via USB rather than via XDMI. I also understand that the Olympus using XDMI takes care of some of the processing which is otherwise done by the DAC. As it was explained to me, the H360 haas 3 stages and if the user is listening via USB all 3 of these stages are used in the Horizon hence the very large jump in dynamics. If however the user is listening via XDMI, those first. 2 stages are handled internally by the Olympus and only the 3rd stage in the Horizon is what gives the perceived increase in gain to XDMI users. IOW @John T your jump up might be even greater than what I am hearingSomething I neglected to include with my previous observations/comments regarding the 360; Due to its robust nature, one may find attenuating the volume back a little may be more conducive. As previously noted the dynamics are huge. I never had to do this with the H1 iterations so I have adjusted accordingly. The input sensitivity may or may not be affected.
You may have to experiment a bit. Keep it at 63 and attenuate only with the linestage/preamplifier. Then try dialing the 360 back and see what you prefer. This may take a little time to find the "sweet spot" that you prefer...
This is very helpful and informative...I totally agree that the dynamics are huge such that I too found myself having to dial back the gain on my preamp. Im one of those guys who prefer the Horizon gain at 63 as that passes the full signal and then I control what @John T discusses. with my preamp. Since I received the original Horizon the gain on. my Lamm preamp has typically been at the 5th lowest detente position. Since receiving the H360 I found myself immediately down to the 4th lowest and after two weeks of settle in I am mnow at the 3rd lowest detente position on my preamp. I did try keep the preamp gain at 4-5 and dialing back on the H360 to 56-57 but to my ears I was missing some of the energy that came with leaving it at 63 so thats where I am again. My understanding is this perceived increase in dynamics is actually greater with H360 users listening via USB rather than via XDMI. I also understand that the Olympus using XDMI takes care of some of the processing which is otherwise done by the DAC. As it was explained to me, the H360 haas 3 stages and if the user is listening via USB all 3 of these stages are used in the Horizon hence the very large jump in dynamics. If however the user is listening via XDMI, those first. 2 stages are handled internally by the Olympus and only the 3rd stage in the Horizon is what gives the perceived increase in gain to XDMI users. IOW @John T your jump up might be even greater than what I am hearing
good advice as from what I recall Lamm used to say you had to be at least at level 4 on his preamp and this is why I am thinking of cutting back on the H360 to 58 so I can be back at 4-5 on my preamp. At the moment the dynamics Im hearing are far from negatively impacted at this low level. I do find that at level 4 on my preamp the sound to my ears is much better but as stated I prefer to run the Horizon at 63. Ill listen again today with XDMI and dial back to 58Barely using your pre to go into power amps will negatively impact the dynamics. The gain structure between the source, pre and power amps is off in that case. I would always look to bypass the volume attenuation on the Horizon (sticking with 63), but in that case it’s worth looking into the gain options for the pre.