Lampizator Valve / Tube Rolling Review Thread
- Thread starter Zero000
- Start date
Apparently when the tube was first made in 1938 they were mesh anodes, but when Telefunken posted their data sheet in 1942, as well as RFT in '53 and Philips in '55, there are no pics of these I can find that suggest they were mesh versions, but only solid plates. My tube plates appears dark grey and sure looks to be solid plates in both tubes.
You have them nice and flush. I just broke one adapter attempting something different. PITA! I'm going to use fast acting super glue, and glue them together! If I hold them they stay flush, but when I let go they spring back apart...
Last edited:
Just for your info:
If I'm not liking the Tungsram as much as you do, is that "denigrating" the Tungsram?
Is it only my way (more your way) or the highway here for you?
I'm not "denigrating" other tubes, I just give MY impression of these tubes.
I also don't favor the FuglyFranky as others do but that is MY taste and synergy in MY systems, nothing more and nothing less.
Fair enough. I'm just saying what it felt like at the time. I have nothing to gain or lose from any of this.
I have been rolling back and forth a bit with DHTs.
Have on hand KR242, RK242, RK PX25, and WE 300b reissues.
The KR242s have been in for the last several mos as my reference, with occasional switch-off to RK242 just for comparison. I recently took the KR242 out and rolled in RKPX25- these seem to give up little in dynamics overall to KR242 but have noticeably fuller/more powerful bottom end. I had several days with the RKPX25 then went to WE300b reissues. These provide a nice return to midrange bloom and still have the necessary punch/dynamics while bass response seems in between the KR242 and RKPX25.
The RK242s are similar to KR but just with slightly less gain and perhaps ever so slightly more refined in the top end. Definitely only a subtle change between the two.
I could live with any of these and could definitely see some preferring either among them based on downstream/upstream system matching and taste.
I also have NOS/OS varieties including WE101FA, Philco ST 01a, RCA ST 112a and Cunningham 01a ST and Globe. I also briefly recently put the WE101FA back in - nice overall but not quite to the level of enjoyment provided by any I’d the above new production tubes.
Way back in this thread there was interest in EML AD1. Justin seemed to like them over several other tykes, but then gravitated toward Tesla AD1n (rare) and then everyone liked the RD27a but the reports on EML AD1 thereafter seemed few. I need quads so the rarer NOS/OS types are difficult for me.
Any additional thoughts on the EML AD1 out there?
Have on hand KR242, RK242, RK PX25, and WE 300b reissues.
The KR242s have been in for the last several mos as my reference, with occasional switch-off to RK242 just for comparison. I recently took the KR242 out and rolled in RKPX25- these seem to give up little in dynamics overall to KR242 but have noticeably fuller/more powerful bottom end. I had several days with the RKPX25 then went to WE300b reissues. These provide a nice return to midrange bloom and still have the necessary punch/dynamics while bass response seems in between the KR242 and RKPX25.
The RK242s are similar to KR but just with slightly less gain and perhaps ever so slightly more refined in the top end. Definitely only a subtle change between the two.
I could live with any of these and could definitely see some preferring either among them based on downstream/upstream system matching and taste.
I also have NOS/OS varieties including WE101FA, Philco ST 01a, RCA ST 112a and Cunningham 01a ST and Globe. I also briefly recently put the WE101FA back in - nice overall but not quite to the level of enjoyment provided by any I’d the above new production tubes.
Way back in this thread there was interest in EML AD1. Justin seemed to like them over several other tykes, but then gravitated toward Tesla AD1n (rare) and then everyone liked the RD27a but the reports on EML AD1 thereafter seemed few. I need quads so the rarer NOS/OS types are difficult for me.
Any additional thoughts on the EML AD1 out there?
I'm not sure anyone was using EML AD1 per se. I have one or two pairs NOS ad1 (Tesla and Phillips) if I remember correctly and they were excellent indeed. Bummer is to seek for quads of NOS tubes...
Yes - my thinking also. For a bargain it would be nice to try, but paying premium for supposed NOS quad is a big risk.
In the first post of this thread Justin was using the EML AD1 and for the first several pages singing its praises. Then, as the thread goes on it doesn’t seem like there is much said about it.
Sounds like a cool amp. There are adapters for the purpose I am sure you know.
I listened to the EML AD1 twice with years in between (to re-evaluate my initial first impression) and both times I was underwhelmed and preferred RK 242 and RK PX25 by a big margin.
I am waiting for someone to be the first tester of the Stradi tubes. They sell an AD1, among others. 
Hm. Always thought your hearing was a bit dodgy, Christoph
EML AD1 is the best out of the EML or KR tubes I have tried. Including the KR 242. I prefer their PX25. I rarely use the EML AD1 because there are quite a few I prefer, really, with the benefit of hindsight.
But when I go back to it I think not bad. Not bad at all. In fact, I am tempted to do that right now.
I had my EML order custom built with a UX4 base. I own Tesla AD1n and Loewe AD1. The former has a bass bias with a laid back treble. The latter is a bit bass shy but otherwise truly outstanding in many respects.
Post #1 of this thread is a great supporter of the EML AD1. With good reason.
Hm. Always thought your hearing was a bit dodgy, Christoph
EML AD1 is the best out of the EML or KR tubes I have tried. Including the KR 242. I prefer their PX25. I rarely use the EML AD1 because there are quite a few I prefer, really, with the benefit of hindsight.
But when I go back to it I think not bad. Not bad at all. In fact, I am tempted to do that right now.
I had my EML order custom built with a UX4 base. I own Tesla AD1n and Loewe AD1. The former has a bass bias with a laid back treble. The latter is a bit bass shy but otherwise truly outstanding in many respects.
Post #1 of this thread is a great supporter of the EML AD1. With good reason.
When you say “prefer the PX25” do you mean EML or KR?
Wondering if any followers of this thread have had experience with a tube known as “Ediswan S11E12” (also CV4060)? I just came across this tonight in a listing where it was noted as being similar (but not equal to) a KT88. Can anyone share info or experience on this tube?
Anyone have experience with the EML PX4 and have an opinion of it? The reviewer of the Pacific 2 on Enjoy the Music site ended up preferring it. I have a GG2/3 and am told it's got a touch of warmth, a touch being something I like. I'm currently using recent production WE 300B's. Thanks,
Dang. So I just emailed Rob at LampiNA today and asked about available tubes and he told me he had EML pX4 available….and they were great.
Just FYI, maybe they are.
Goran thought they were boring. -search…
I have no experience with them (EML PX4)
Right now I like RK PX25. WE 300b, and RK or KR 242.
I would be interested in EML PX25 and EML AD1 however.
Last edited:
I second Goran's opinion about the PX4 being rather boring, at least compared to the excellent PX25 and 242.
I'm generally not really fond of EML mesh tubes and much prefer KR tubes.
I find the EML mesh tubes unnaturally kind of tizzy.
I don't know if there is a EML PX25 but I was underwhelmed by the EML AD1.
What are you missing sonically with the really excellent tubes you already have?
Hi Christoph,
It‘s not that I am missing anything really. It’s a quest I guess and it’s fun.
I would like to have a best-of stable of quads, one per each position on the heater dial. The AD1 seems a candidate for the PX4 setting, but opinions seemed mixed on it. Any other suggestions?
I would also like backups in case of an odd failure.
I sure hope the general thinking and advice that the DHTs (as implemented) will last years turns out to be correct. It seems right now that it will be difficult to replace them.
Similar threads
