Double mica construction rules!Yeah it's OK I thinkNot an award winner, though.
Lampizator Valve / Tube Rolling Review Thread
- Thread starter Zero000
- Start date
Well I am looking at my FE's internal construction against that picture and it looks identical as far as I can see.
Interesting.
This kind Japanese seller will let you have 1 FE identical to mine for £823.41 plus postage. I paid £45.
Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products!
www.ebay.co.uk
This kind Japanese seller will let you have 1 FE identical to mine for £823.41 plus postage. I paid £45.
Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products!www.ebay.co.uk
Yes...becuz footscray sound better and cists waaay more. People know.
Well i have Brimar with double mica and I paid it 90% less then this guy is asking - so it can very well stay in JapanThis kind Japanese seller will let you have 1 FE identical to mine for £823.41 plus postage. I paid £45.
Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer | eBay
Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Brimar Cv717/5R4Gy Hanging Heater Direct Thermal Rectifier Nib 3 Brimmer at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products!www.ebay.co.uk
STC=Brimar it's the same tube as mine.Well i have Brimar with double mica and I paid it 90% less then this guy is asking - so it can very well stay in Japan
Guys...SFox and I dug into this years ago. He brought me up to speed on this stuff. Footscray STC was selling for over $500 each 5 years ago already. More than Brimar. Oldway FE sold for like $40 then. The tube Goran has is a Brimar double mica. Again a diff tube. I jave had Cetron/CEI/Mazda/Haltron version of that. Maybe even a Brimar...cant recall. Never had the Fivre as it was akways too expensive.
So Justin, even if similar looking Footscray production is always far more expensive that Oldway. The market values it a lot more, based on extensive but subjective user feedback.
So Justin, even if similar looking Footscray production is always far more expensive that Oldway. The market values it a lot more, based on extensive but subjective user feedback.
Norman you missed the point. The £800+ tube in the eBay link is an FE Oldway.
Given there appears to be no difference in the Footscray versus Oldway, I wonder whether the grids and filaments are in some way different.
Goran I agree it's not the same. But STC is Brimar. As a quick example see this 5Z4GY add.
Given there appears to be no difference in the Footscray versus Oldway, I wonder whether the grids and filaments are in some way different.
Goran I agree it's not the same. But STC is Brimar. As a quick example see this 5Z4GY add.
I also did research into this years ago. Here are my notes on what makes it a footscray:
1) D getters
2) hanging filaments below mica by springs, not abutting the mica
3) straight support bars (outside anode plate), none crossing
could be labeled stc or brimar. Need to have all those features to ensure footscray.
1) D getters
2) hanging filaments below mica by springs, not abutting the mica
3) straight support bars (outside anode plate), none crossing
could be labeled stc or brimar. Need to have all those features to ensure footscray.
So here are some pictures.
1) brimar labeled but has all the features
2) very similar labeling to #1 but notice the O getters
3) not labeled but notice same construction as #1
4) picture of hanging filaments on all of them
5) included for fun, a fivre from the 1960’s supposedly
1) brimar labeled but has all the features
2) very similar labeling to #1 but notice the O getters
3) not labeled but notice same construction as #1
4) picture of hanging filaments on all of them
5) included for fun, a fivre from the 1960’s supposedly
Attachments
Excellent post. Mine has circular getters exactly like your pic 2. Otherwise the same as 1. Can you hear any difference between 1 and 2?
Ok this is interesting, I had a new pair of eml px4 I got by mistake which I thought were a bit “soft” and closed soundstage. Since I had the footscray brimar out, I switch it in for the tak 274b. More air and bigger soundstage. And now the sound had a bit more bite to it and bass was faster, At the cost maybe, of loss of density. But really did sound better.
ill test it out later. Right now have the D getter brimar in with comments above. I’ll let it play a bit and try the Brimar with O getters
Similar threads
