at 44k, the upgrade path is a very nice value proposition. Basically, you pay just the difference between Mk1 and MK2 version and get your speaker upgraded to latest version. A good deal given that upgrade will require a complete dismantle and re-machining of a front plate...
I would assume most Q7 owners would go for it - the sound improvement from new tweeter, mid-range driver and Supreme Evo caps is not minor. the tweeter in particular is just amazing in its ability to disappear.
you have a better solution... like building a machine shop in your garage?I wonder how practical to send two boxes of Q7 -each weighs 340-350kg before packaging- to Magico factory especially if overseas?
Why has the Mk2 gone up 44k from the Mk1?
protects the value of the current Q7 owners to some small degree......and reduces blowback.
if you had purchased Q7's how would you feel if there was a significant change at the same price? you would then demand that change for free. and the heat would be on the dealers big time.
they had no choice.
the cost to build the Mk2 is pretty much the same. it's a marketing issue.
protects the value of the current Q7 owners to some small degree......and reduces blowback.
if you had purchased Q7's how would you feel if there was a significant change at the same price? you would then demand that change for free. and the heat would be on the dealers big time.
now the Mk1 owners get some 'value' for their $44k, and if you could afford $185.....or whatever they paid....they can afford the $44k to get current tech.
Magico had no choice.
the cost to build the Mk2 is pretty much the same. it's a marketing issue.
Why is it accepted in the hifi industry?
Two years from now there will be a Magico 8 and it will be at least $400K ......
Because there are enough willing buyers to pay the premium and like all rational agents in a free market economy Magico does not want to leave money on the table. If Honda pulled this stunt, people would simply buy a Toyota. Most people that are committed to the Magico brand won't switch to Wilson because of pricing. In ultra high end audio, there is high products and brands differentiation and low price elasticity of demand in economic speak.
That is when I'll jump in. I really try to avoid cheap speaker like the 7 MKII.
Agree Mike, its BS
You are in the car industry. If they used this hi end hifi logic of putting up car prices by 24% for every new model, the car industry would go bankrupt.
nobody cares that your car has been superceeded and worth less on the used market - why should hifi be any different?.
Why is it accepted in the hifi industry?
oh btw, how would I feel if I owned the Q7 mk1 and could buy an greatly improved Mk2 at the same price - I would be happy. If I wanted to upgrade it for 44k or sell it and buy a new one, that would be my choice.
Didn't the Q7 come out in 2012 at $165,000? I don't recall when it went to $185,000 but $165k to $229k in under 3 years seems a bit much to me.
EVERYTHING gets superseded by a newer/better model.
Most people are weak and can't stand the thought of that, so the manufacturers raise the price to help them feel better about their newly obsolete purchase.
EVERYTHING gets superseded by a newer/better model.
Most people are weak and can't stand the thought of that, so the manufacturers raise the price to help them feel better about their newly obsolete purchase.
The driving force of the high end industry is an obsessive compulsive disorder of man in the 40-70 age range with a significant surplus of discretionary funds on their hands. This dictates some very unique and interesting marketing strategies.
The driving force of the high end industry is an obsessive compulsive disorder of man in the 40-70 age range with a significant surplus of discretionary funds on their hands. This dictates some very unique and interesting marketing strategies.