So do I...Thank you, Lloyd!
Far into the future I see REL No. 25s or Funk 18.2s in my future . . .
So do I...Thank you, Lloyd!
Far into the future I see REL No. 25s or Funk 18.2s in my future . . .
I think we agree those arrays are amazingly important when your crossover is much higher...THEN, tonal qualities, very very audible character of bass is exceptionally important...and the BLENDING of the towers into the main speakers/frequencies is an absolute must.Oh, I agree! A long array of 8 inch or 9 inch drivers is not the answer to the question we are asking here!
Aside from the obvious (quality, set up being more complex with more subs, etc, etc)...I DO think in my experience in our system, MORE to date has been better...and we think there is MUCH more to go. Even if more is being asked to do "less", that is still important. And of course, I am reminded by an audio dealer who spoke of Dan D'Agostino's personal system of Wilson X1/Grand SLAMMS where apparently had SIX Krell Master Reference Subs (the grand daddy of perhaps the current Magico design)...dual-opposed 15" cones, in a massively robust aluminum casing/frame and DSP...plus an inbuilt Krell FPB600 series amp. SIX of them with his X1/Grand Slamms...apparently transformational sound.Maybe more woofing is better than less woofing?
(We will have to consult Big Dog RJ on this subject!)
blending the towers......now that is an art. i suppose it can be done seamlessly after the fact, but ideally you would like the main powers to be designed to integrate organically. for instance, my particular passive main towers cannot be used as a stand alone set of speakers. on about a third of music they are too rolled off. the other two thirds they are just a little short of authority. and they go down flat to 40hz and still there into the mid-20hz range. the active bass towers have an adjustable crossover that can go up to 40hz. mine are set at about 37hz.I think we agree those arrays are amazingly important when your crossover is much higher...THEN, tonal qualities, very very audible character of bass is exceptionally important...and the BLENDING of the towers into the main speakers/frequencies is an absolute must.
100% agree and I am surely no techie and have limited experience with this. But I have crossed over subs with Guarneris...and 'lived with' the limitations of the sound I was getting...and it was fine. I really enjoyed it, but it was not perfect either and I accepted that.blending the towers......now that is an art. i suppose it can be done seamlessly after the fact, but ideally you would like the main powers to be designed to integrate organically. for instance, my particular passive main towers cannot be used as a stand alone set of speakers. on about a third of music they are too rolled off. the other two thirds they are just a little short of authority. and they go down flat to 40hz and still there into the mid-20hz range. the active bass towers have an adjustable crossover that can go up to 40hz. mine are set at about 37hz.
but i also think it's important to balance the mid bass with the deep bass. if you have all this air moving at under 40hz, is the mid bass as well served? the mid bass is the power range of much of the music; vocals, drum kits, cello, bass guitar......so seamless musical bass is complicated. it's not just one thing.
So do I...
Hey Ron,Lloyd, what is your thinking and preference regarding front-firing only or dual-opposed (back-to-back) subwoofers?
Your XLFs have front-firing drivers only. My Pendragon bass towers are front-firing only.
Would dual-opposed subwoofers cause some sort of issue or incompatibility? What would be the point of using front-firing and rear-firing subwoofers if none of the other woofer drivers in our system operate that way?
Even if the Magico is cut off above 28hz?If blending a 2 tower design is already an art , i am afraid integrating the magico sub seamlessly will be nothing short of magic
Id go for a bigger magico model anytime compared to a small speaker - sub combo
It has nothing to do with cut off freq .Even if the Magico is cut off above 28hz?
Interesting...in the case of the XLF, the cones ARE 15" (13" and 15" actually)...plus with the 360 degree phase control, should this not be solveable in-room?It has nothing to do with cut off freq .
But all to do with the usually heavy membrane of the sub that has to move in phase with the small main speaker cones
All the sub problems i have heard were phase problems .
If a sub is moving nicely in phase it isnt that important where it cuts of .
It can even roll off gently on its own and support higher freq as long its moving in tandem with main speaker its okay
I dont know your exact situation .Interesting...in the case of the XLF, the cones ARE 15" (13" and 15" actually)...plus with the 360 degree phase control, should this not be solveable in-room?
Hey Ron,
Not an expert but given deep bass' multi-directionality particularly sub 30hz which is more feel than pinpoint, I suspect that (for me) the primary focus of design will be low distortion, high powered, effortless movement of a lot of air. And the dual-opposed helps in keeping cabinet vibrations down due to the opposing forces as I am told. As for implications of sound travel due to front firing vs dual-opposed, again I am no technie, but I suspect most of that will be handled during setup, and with multi-directionality, I am not [too] focused on it for now.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |