Stereo, I know you're a massive fan of the spkr, so can you answer one q that's nagging me about the Ultimate design. It appears to use a standard dynamic cone for the 15" bass driver, sitting at the base of the spkr. Is there really no discontinuity w/the compression drivers in the remaining 4 drivers, which of course are all horns? Ie can you really detect no lack of speed in the bass as compared to the rest of the frequency range? I understand this bass section is as over-engineered as the rest of the spkr, but as a total assault on the bleeding edge of the SOTA, couldn't a long bass horn have been used so that ALL five drivers are horns, and not in effect a 4 horn/1 dynamic driver hybrid?
The top model in the Cessaro line uses a stack of backloaded horns to provide the bottom end in their line (see the Omegas), and as a result there may be more homogeneity into the bass w/ the Omega's 6 horn drivers than w/ the Ultimate 4 horn/1 dynamic driver hybrid.
Re design of a long bass horn in the Ultimates, do you think Magico could have created one that in the current design starts right at the top most, and rear most, extents of the height/rear of the spkr, and sweeps vertically down, and then forward across the base of the spkr to flare out at the front where the current 15" cone is situated?
The top model in the Cessaro line uses a stack of backloaded horns to provide the bottom end in their line (see the Omegas), and as a result there may be more homogeneity into the bass w/ the Omega's 6 horn drivers than w/ the Ultimate 4 horn/1 dynamic driver hybrid.
Re design of a long bass horn in the Ultimates, do you think Magico could have created one that in the current design starts right at the top most, and rear most, extents of the height/rear of the spkr, and sweeps vertically down, and then forward across the base of the spkr to flare out at the front where the current 15" cone is situated?