Now I switched to CAD gc3 ground control unit.
After warm up overnight I will give my opinion on it.
After warm up overnight I will give my opinion on it.
Feel free to not watch themOut of curiosity, what is the point of constantly posting these low resolution videos?
@thomask is working out the placement of his speakers in challenging rooms. He has been getting feedback from others about reflections, and other room anomalies to aid in his setup.Out of curiosity, what is the point of constantly posting these low resolution videos?
Actually i try to fine tune the sound through Ground control and Furutek NCF filter on both Altec and Lansche.@thomask is working out the placement of his speakers in challenging rooms. He has been getting feedback from others about reflections, and other room anomalies to aid in his setup.
Altec A7 does sound much better than i expected.
I picked it up only three weeks ago.
It give effortless dynamics and nuanced bass with wide and deep soundstage.
Although Altec does not sound boxy, I could notice more holographic imaging through my modern speaker Lansche 4.1 which I had been using since 2006.
I am happy to have both.
I will play each depending on music and my mood.
Altec seems to work better with Jazz and rock music although it is not slouch with Classical music.
The effect of Ground control on both Altec and Lansche appears to be more sensitive than I expected.
I will give update only when it affect the sound of speaker seriously.
Thanks everybody on inputs.
That is a good question.Thank you for sharing your system with us and posting these observations. Every listener has preferences and given your descriptions I can understand why you like both speakers.
I’m curious which one do you think sounds to you more like live unamplified instruments? Do you hear holographic images when you’re listening to live music?
That is a good question.
I think Altec A7 sounds more like live music.
The holographic imaging through Lansche 4.1 may be exaggerated effect which can not be heard at live concert.
But audiophiles tend to enjoy such holographic imaging .
It is my dream to set up Western horn system with field coil driver at my home some day.thank you Thomask. This is a long thread and to me this post gets to the heart of the matter of the difference between modern and vintage speakers. I think it’s about the attributes they present to the listener and what the listener prefers. But, I don’t think one can make this overly simple or generalized.
thank you Thomask. This is a long thread and to me this post gets to the heart of the matter of the difference between modern and vintage speakers. I think it’s about the attributes they present to the listener and what the listener prefers. But, I don’t think one can make this overly simple or generalized.
Lansche is sensitive to the listening space.Personally I think it is more than that. I heard the 20k and 65k euro Lansche in same room as devore orangutans (the amps on Lansche were different to those that worked best on devore).
The Lansche on first track impressed. Nice midrange and clean highs and weight. However, and it is possibly due to the active bass, not sure why, but the Lansche stage is constant across recordings. It is the stage of the speaker. The devore was much more into showing the venue that differed LP to LP and more flow, so I preferred that much more for realism.
Now, each Altec sounds different. That said, The one woofer A7 will be more boxier than the 817 due to moving to the vented bass (away from the horn bass).
Also, when Thomas says Lansche is better for classical the Altec mids and highs will be less nuanced than the Lansche. They have nice timbre but less nuance. So I always suggest using Radian or TAD there though I also like Altec but if ultimate nuance especially on violin concertos and separation on large scale is the goal.
Imagining aside, in what way do the ALTECs sound more like live?That is a good question.
I think Altec A7 sounds more like live music.
The holographic imaging through Lansche 4.1 may be exaggerated effect which can not be heard at live concert.
But audiophiles tend to enjoy such holographic imaging .
Thomas’s Lansche are different than the ones you have heard. They have a Supravox mid/bass that is very fast and dynamic sounding (And it is 99db/watt). The newer ones are all lower sensitivity and far more conventional. I had a customer with the Lansche Goa that was super dynamic (predecessor of their Cubus speaker). They turned away from high sensitivity about 10 years ago except for Cubus II.Personally I think it is more than that. I heard the 20k and 65k euro Lansche in same room as devore orangutans (the amps on Lansche were different to those that worked best on devore).
The Lansche on first track impressed. Nice midrange and clean highs and weight. However, and it is possibly due to the active bass, not sure why, but the Lansche stage is constant across recordings. It is the stage of the speaker. The devore was much more into showing the venue that differed LP to LP and more flow, so I preferred that much more for realism.
Now, each Altec sounds different. That said, The one woofer A7 will be more boxier than the 817 due to moving to the vented bass (away from the horn bass).
Also, when Thomas says Lansche is better for classical the Altec mids and highs will be less nuanced than the Lansche. They have nice timbre but less nuance. So I always suggest using Radian or TAD there though I also like Altec but if ultimate nuance especially on violin concertos and separation on large scale is the goal.
Altec sounds more natural with effortless dynamics.Imagining aside, in what way do the ALTECs sound more like live?