Jeff, you are correct that natural sound was never presented as what is best. I presented it as a list of observations based on listening to four systems at David Karmeli's house in Utah and as a reference to live unamplified music. I never said it was the only way to achieve anything accept my own goals, and I never told anyone else to adopt my approach or buy the same gear.
I rejected my own past values and approach to the hobby and moved in a completely different direction. Note that this is my system thread where I ruminate about what I did and why. It is not a treatise on audio in the general forum by someone telling others what they should do. That was never my intent or interest. Besides, no one has that much influence over such a diverse group of hobbyists.
For the sake of argument, I will assume you are calling me a member of the tribe and David Karmeli the tribal leader. So when you say you "suggested to members of the tribe to try non-LAMM equipment the response is always the same:..." I have to disagree. Here is why: I was not a member of the tribe before I owned my Lamm gear. Having just become a tribe member by buying the Lamm gear, why would you then suggest to someone to forget the LL1 Reference, LP2.1 Deluxe, and pair of ML2s he just bought and try something different? Why would you think anyone would do that right after buying all this new stuff? Why would anyone take your suggestion seriously? I know I never responded the way you are now claiming, so you must be describing someone else. You did share with me your joy in trying a bunch of different inexpensive Chinese amps after selling your Lamm amps. And, come to think of it, why would you suggest to someone who is happy with his gear, to try something else anyway? Who does that? Someone cationed me about the AS2000 turntable too. I do not get that.