You’re talking about the room and it’s overall general character which is damp or lively, nothing to do with natural as it pertains to the playback system.Ok, here‘s a question...
I have an engineered acoustic space. I know some would say it is “damped” but I was happy when I walked into the showroom at Magico a few weeks back I heard very much the same as my own room. Perhaps a little more lively, but the room was also at least double the volume. I want to have some professional musicians come play live, un-amplified for myself and a tiny audience. Is the sound in my room going to be anything but “natural”?
Part of “natural” sound is in the system’s ability to differentiate between the recordings and the ambience of the venues, ie resolution. If your system always has “that sound” as you mentioned it’s colored not natural, lacks the resolution or is hindered by something.If I try to build a music system that approaches that sound, will it not be “natural sound”?
Neither! A natural system needs to be neutral and reproduce each recording’s tone, timbre, ambience, etc. true to the venue and event not impose a quality. Playing back your recording from the live room should still sound like the live room when played back in the dampened one and vice versa.I’m not trying to be a wise-ass, honestly. I’m completely serious. If those same musicians play upstairs in my overly live, echo-y, reverberant room, is that not also ‘natural sound’ even though it is going to be vastly different from my music room? If I build a system to match that sound, which system is more “natural sounding”?
david