Micro
I have great experience with dipole and if there is something i can tell they never do is the sensation of pressure upon your body.. That bass in the chest sensation is not wha dipole do well .. However low they may go ... I believe we may have to get to define our terms properly. Pressurization is felt at the ear and somewhat body level... In some cases of extreme pressurization, ask any one who has experience the Rotary sub, you can even feel sick.. The compression of air in the room is palpable .. That is pressurization to me.. We , audiophile will take any good word and trivialize it to the point of useless-ness. Let's try not to do the same for pressurization ... Remember what we did to "Transparency"?
R2R, Vinyl, Digital-lossless , digital lossy (mp3, etc) do it with the appropriate content and transducers. The better the room sealing and isolation, the better the impression of pressure .. If you really want to experience Room Pressurization, get in a car with some serious subs.. You will know what I mean ...
Frantz,
I see you point. IMHO, if we want to avoid audiophile generalizations, we do not need to debate it an audiophile forum. I have a very good friend who is an expert in explosives development, I can ask for his help about the best way to maximize pressure in our chest! I was addressing the "subjective" room pressurization - not the law of the perfect gases – because it is often referred in audiophiles jargon. If we agree (not an easy job) on what they want to mean first, may be we can the later relate with physics. But we can try the other way.
IMHO, PV = nRT characteristic of sealed systems only solves very basic problems. Considering that most audiophile rooms usually have HVAC systems, at maximum we can thing about the pressure of a wave front - I do not see any advantage in studying simple compression modes. Do the people who refer to chest (and back, BTW) pressure or pants legs that would literally flap remember if the phenomena is asymmetrical, as usually displayed in cartoons, or symmetrical? This answer can be very important to our perception.
Some side remarks.
May be it is against the official WBF approved jargon admitting that panels can pressurize rooms , but most of the reviews I read about the big panels as MG20’s and big Apogee’s refer to the way they pressurize the room in the bass. Please not that in my previous post I referred that for this the speaker panel needs to be placed in the best location in the room, far from the back wall. I experienced it with Tympani’s, long ago.
To make it clear, I am not addressing what I consider exceptional cases of pressurizing such as the TR17 or Mark Weiss bass systems – just ordinary sound reproduction (Steve, Bruce , Mike Lavigne, Amir, other owners of extended bass systems, your opinions would be welcome ).
I find to difficult to ignore that the feeling of pressurized room in sound reproduction can be addressed ignoring the full spectrum reproduction. Humans react differently to the same stimulus according to the situation and the association of the pressure and sound creates this feeling.
Just to end, I had to deal with similar pressure problems in the past when I had to assemble a class 100 clean room. But no music was allowed in it.