For the record, I've never been a fan of massed-tetrode/pentode high power tube amps, and that goes further true for VTL. Plus it's stuffed with today's generic blah Russian mass-produced KT tubes. That said, listening to Ron's temporary system via Magnepans last week showed the objective superiority of Tetrode Mode in his VTLs, with that speaker, in his room. In triode mode, the sound was hooded, oversmooth, with sanded transients, truncated harmonics and spatially limited to the box defined by the speakers' placements, with very little depth projected. In tetrode mode, there was greater and more natural resolution; the soundstage was realistically larger and scaled outside of the width of the dimensions separating the Magnepans, and more depth dimensioning. Filigreed details were also more honestly and articulately rendered. Bass from his subs was also more articulate, firmer, and quicker. Some pentode/tetrode amps don't shine in pseudo-triode mode; others do. The tetrode advantages in this case were consistent across multiple recordings. A given listener could still prefer the old-school rounded sound of triode mode in the VTL. With something like new KR KT88s or NOS Genelecs populating the VTLs, the outcome could be different.
I visited Ron a few days before his Denon turntable showed up, so intend to go back to hear the system fed by analog. Everything will have to be re-evaluated after the Pendragons are installed to replace the stopgap Magnepans but his room is dimensionally favorable, the environment is quiet. It should host an engaging system.
PS: Do people really compare and care about "Thriller" pressings/versions?
Phil