Eeesh! Sorry. I just replaced the old video above with the old one which was recorded with iPhone internal mic.
I knew that which was the reason for my 5432 post. I don’t make posts without reason
Eeesh! Sorry. I just replaced the old video above with the old one which was recorded with iPhone internal mic.
The Gryphon with Iphone recording (to compare apples to apples).The sound of the video in which post number does each of you prefer?
The sound of the video in which post number does each of you prefer?
Why do you prefer the sound of the video in Post #5,430?Ron, I prefer the second video.
bass and vocals are much clearer...voice is more present.Why do you prefer the sound of the video in Post #5,430?
Why do you prefer the sound of the video in Post #5,430?
Completely opposite. I found the voice in 5430 is very unnatural. The bass in 5429 is better. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong. I am only saying naturalness is the ear of beholder.The overall sound is more balanced. The bass is less bloated, slightly more natural with some nuance. The voice is more natural,but lacks some a bit of fullness/body/weight. The voice in the first video sounds very strange. I hear some strange room effects or interference from the towers in the first video. In both videos, there is stark contrast and vibrant sound, perhaps from the absorption panels, but some nuance seems missing.
I am still curious about the questions I asked you above.
Completely opposite. I found the voice in 5430 is very unnatural. The bass in 5429 is better. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong. I am only saying naturalness is the ear of beholder.
THe bass is wooly and indistinct in 5429. The voice lacks presence. I didn't say whether or not one was more natural than the other...neither is all that natural sounding but the clarity of 5430 and bass definition wins it for me between the two.Completely opposite. I found the voice in 5430 is very unnatural. The bass in 5429 is better. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong. I am only saying naturalness is the ear of beholder.
+ 1I didn't say whether or not one was more natural than the other...neither is all that natural sounding
You nailed it RexI didn't like the voice in either.
5430 had way more lifelike and natural cello to me. I could hear the strings and wood. 5429 the cello was fat and veiled.
You’re saying what you hear and that is fine.Completely opposite. I found the voice in 5430 is very unnatural. The bass in 5429 is better. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong. I am only saying naturalness is the ear of beholder.
I think the jadis are not up to challenge of the Clarysis lol.5429
Jadis JA100
Clarisys
Brinkmann + Phantom Elite + ZYX
Cardas Clear Reflection
5430
VTL Siegfried II
Pendragon
Denon + Hana SL
Belden 1192A
5429
Jadis JA100
Clarisys
Brinkmann + Phantom Elite + ZYX
Cardas Clear Reflection
5430
VTL Siegfried II
Pendragon
Denon + Hana SL
Belden 1192A
THe bass is wooly and indistinct in 5429. The voice lacks presence. I didn't say whether or not one was more natural than the other...neither is all that natural sounding but the clarity of 5430 and bass definition wins it for me between the two.