Steve's install was done with US SUNPOWER PANELS. I also enquired to Steve. They are some of the more expensive panels but very well made...Is this your solar provider?
Residential Solar, Clean Energy Storage & EV Charging | SunPower
Go solar with SunPower, the top-rated solar company in the U.S. and America's provider of high-quality, reliable home solar and renewable-energy solutions.us.sunpower.com
I assume we'll each get two? (out from the DC distributor)No, they will only be included with the DC distributor with which you don’t need an Y cable.
Sun PowerIs this your solar provider?
Residential Solar, Clean Energy Storage & EV Charging | SunPower
Go solar with SunPower, the top-rated solar company in the U.S. and America's provider of high-quality, reliable home solar and renewable-energy solutions.us.sunpower.com
I can't share any comparison with the Uptone EtherREGEN but I can comment on a comparison to the Norodost Switch. I used the Nordost Switch for several months prior to the Taiko Switch. When the Switch first arrived, I did not have the new card for the Extreme so it was an apples to apples comparison. Not surprisingly, the Taiko switch was significantly superior sonically. But what was unexpected is that the "nasty" drop outs and forced reboots I experienced with the Nordost switch decreased as well w the Taiko switch. Some Teamviewer sessions with Emile suggested that there were some buffering issues with the Nordost switch that did not occur with the Taiko switch. So on both issues of operational stability as well as SQ, the Taiko swtich was a significant improvement. I don't wish to denigrate the Nordost switch, which is very good. But the Taiko switch is quite superior, at least in my system.Anyone consider doing a comparison of the Taiko switch and the Uptone EtherREGEN?
I, too, went from using the EtherRegen as my switch to feed the Extreme to the Taiko Switch + NIC, and there is simply no comparison. The Taiko Switch move was equivalent to a significant component upgrade improving so many facets of SQ.Did it 2 weeks ago,
Taiko switch is far superior in every way. I mean really far.
Uptone is great ( best) for the money you pay for it.
But now it acts as an Access point defense / isolator together with 2 Buffalo switches.
Ether Regen has very good isolating transformers on each wire connection . Well designed.
Also keep in mind they sold 3200 EtherRegens , so very big sucess
and they are working now on EtherRegen2
That will have 1G speed between A and B ports with 100 % isolation .
Interesting. So this is specifically the EM field interacting with the earth loop, Not a ground loop problem.Another aspect is earth loops, which is particularly hard to fix in our systems, cannot find an easy to read piece with a quick google but this picture visualises this particular issue.
View attachment 109072
Taken from here: https://www.smar.com/en/technical-article/tips-on-shielding-and-grounding-in-industrial-automation
Ah! This could be the interaction I noticed. By placing a wood board over the top (transmission side) of the Eero, I effectively shielded it from the pre-amp. Could then be the preamp specifically that is amplifying this noise, which makes sense.This is a example of WiFi RF directly causing noise in the signal domain. A Berning zotl circuit utilizes a carrier frequency of 250,000hz or 500,000hz within its circuits. In my system the WIFI AP in close proximity to my zotl preamp generated an audible beat frequency at the speakers. Moving the device 6 ft. away from the preamp reduced the “noise” below audible levels.
Others have written about the wifi RF interfering with digital devices, but it was uncertain whether in the analog or digital domain.
So, with every gain stage or device having an unknown resonance, every receiver operating with unknown parameters, etc. etc., any strong RF can mess with the signal, although system and device dependent.
I assume we'll each get two? (out from the DC distributor)
Another aspect is earth loops, which is particularly hard to fix in our systems, cannot find an easy to read piece with a quick google but this picture visualises this particular issue.
View attachment 109072
Taken from here: https://www.smar.com/en/technical-article/tips-on-shielding-and-grounding-in-industrial-automation
well in your particular case, read pages 33-37.
In comparison Wifi v wired connection with same ipad The difference is so big that it must be eliminated.
Interesting. So this is specifically the EM field interacting with the earth loop, Not a ground loop problem.
This issue is technically over my head, but Kris' comment rings true to me. A wired connection from my ISP modem to the Switch sounds significantly better to me than a Wi-fi signal driving the switch. I currently use an LPS for the Switch and an Orbi mesh satellite that provides Wi-Fi service to the music room. If the source of noise/field loops that may account for the superiority of the wired connection is EMI coming from the LPS, would an effective remedy simply be to wrap the LPS in a small mu metal/copper foil enclosure (i.e., a mini Faraday cage)? I understand that a BPS would be the preferred approach, but mu metal/copper foil is a heck of a lot cheaper! (I assume wrapping the Orbi satellite AP itself in foil would not be a good idea.)
No doubt the most useful and succinct post on the topic that I've read this year. Maybe last year, too.Unfortunately it's not as simple as that. There are a lot of factors in play and as we as audiophiles are all just going by what sounds best to us at any given point in time, complicated by the fact that, assuming our ears are reliable evaluation tools, that we tend to not re-evaluate previous system changes after introducing the next system change. On top of that something which sounds better to us does not mean it it lowers noise. You could easily cascade a series of noise increasing system changes which all sound better to you, till you reach problematic noise levels.
Grounding is one of those areas where you can easily "go wrong" technically, every additional ground wire/path you add has the potential to create an additional earth loop area which can pickup noise. So let's take the switch and router as an example, you can add a ground wire between router and switch which would reduce the current on the DAC cable shield between router and switch, the larger the gauge of the ground wire, the lower the current on the DAC cable shield would be. This could in turn decrease coupling to the signal carrying conductors, BUT you change the earth loop area and you may increase susceptibility to external EMI field coupling which can in turn couple into your system. The more ground wires you have, the higher the likeliness of this becoming a problem. As tweaking grounding is very popular with audiophiles this can become a very large factor in systems with ground wires and earth loops everywhere. This adds to the difficulty in predicting which types of noise are wreaking the most havoc in a system.
Additionally all noise on your safety earth ground, does not "flow to ground" as people tend to think. It just travels everywhere, through all earth wiring in your home and to all equipment connected to it. Now there are lots of "grounding" products claiming to dissipate this noise, but that's really not something you can just do, but even if they could, all that noise would still be there, just perhaps reduce in level faster, or perhaps with reduced harmonics, but I should add this is a big IF, for clarity, I'm not trying to dismiss audible improvements stemming from these devices, I've personally build and even sold some of these, and they do exert an effect, sometimes very profound. Anyway, all this additional wiring will have noise riding on it, create additional loops which can pickup external noise, which can then couple to your components / signal wiring again.
Taking a screenshot from the link I posted earlier in this thread :
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/InfoComm-Grounding2012.pdf
View attachment 109111
This would indeed be typical for the noise spectrum on your home safety ground, this noise spectrum will also be present on your "ground" wires, component chassis, cable shields etc, for a deeper dive in some of the mechanics I again recommend reading that link.
Let's dig into this a little bit further with a few old measurements I took myself which I probably posted in this thread aswell.
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a Linear Power supply, this is caused by the current draw when charging a capacitor bank:
View attachment 109112
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a SMPS, with a ~37-47KHz noise spectrum, probably has "spread spectrum" applied at a ~42KHz switching frequency:
View attachment 109113
The point of sharing these is that both a LPS and a SMPS cause "ground noise", more supplies = more noise, but SMPS noise is considered more harmful to sound (with which I agree). Both types of noise will find their way into our systems, and now we're ONLY looking at noise created by power supplies themselves without actually powering something which can significantly change this noise spectrum.
Add a lot of ground wires everywhere, add ground loops, and you can see how unpredictable everything becomes.
Ideally you'd have an expert at system grounding, for example for recording studios, design your system grounding for you. But the kicker is, you may not even like the resulting sound, as technically superior does not mean (subjectively) better sound.
And to actually answer your question, indeed a "ground loop" is not the same thing as a "loop area" which can pick up noise.
Unfortunately it's not as simple as that. There are a lot of factors in play and as we as audiophiles are all just going by what sounds best to us at any given point in time, complicated by the fact that, assuming our ears are reliable evaluation tools, that we tend to not re-evaluate previous system changes after introducing the next system change. On top of that something which sounds better to us does not mean it it lowers noise. You could easily cascade a series of noise increasing system changes which all sound better to you, till you reach problematic noise levels.
Grounding is one of those areas where you can easily "go wrong" technically, every additional ground wire/path you add has the potential to create an additional earth loop area which can pickup noise. So let's take the switch and router as an example, you can add a ground wire between router and switch which would reduce the current on the DAC cable shield between router and switch, the larger the gauge of the ground wire, the lower the current on the DAC cable shield would be. This could in turn decrease coupling to the signal carrying conductors, BUT you change the earth loop area and you may increase susceptibility to external EMI field coupling which can in turn couple into your system. The more ground wires you have, the higher the likeliness of this becoming a problem. As tweaking grounding is very popular with audiophiles this can become a very large factor in systems with ground wires and earth loops everywhere. This adds to the difficulty in predicting which types of noise are wreaking the most havoc in a system.
Additionally all noise on your safety earth ground, does not "flow to ground" as people tend to think. It just travels everywhere, through all earth wiring in your home and to all equipment connected to it. Now there are lots of "grounding" products claiming to dissipate this noise, but that's really not something you can just do, but even if they could, all that noise would still be there, just perhaps reduce in level faster, or perhaps with reduced harmonics, but I should add this is a big IF, for clarity, I'm not trying to dismiss audible improvements stemming from these devices, I've personally build and even sold some of these, and they do exert an effect, sometimes very profound. Anyway, all this additional wiring will have noise riding on it, create additional loops which can pickup external noise, which can then couple to your components / signal wiring again.
Taking a screenshot from the link I posted earlier in this thread :
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/InfoComm-Grounding2012.pdf
View attachment 109111
This would indeed be typical for the noise spectrum on your home safety ground, this noise spectrum will also be present on your "ground" wires, component chassis, cable shields etc, for a deeper dive in some of the mechanics I again recommend reading that link.
Let's dig into this a little bit further with a few old measurements I took myself which I probably posted in this thread aswell.
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a Linear Power supply, this is caused by the current draw when charging a capacitor bank:
View attachment 109112
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a SMPS, with a ~37-47KHz noise spectrum, probably has "spread spectrum" applied at a ~42KHz switching frequency:
View attachment 109113
The point of sharing these is that both a LPS and a SMPS cause "ground noise", more supplies = more noise, but SMPS noise is considered more harmful to sound (with which I agree). Both types of noise will find their way into our systems, and now we're ONLY looking at noise created by power supplies themselves without actually powering something which can significantly change this noise spectrum.
Add a lot of ground wires everywhere, add ground loops, and you can see how unpredictable everything becomes.
Ideally you'd have an expert at system grounding, for example for recording studios, design your system grounding for you. But the kicker is, you may not even like the resulting sound, as technically superior does not mean (subjectively) better sound.
And to actually answer your question, indeed a "ground loop" is not the same thing as a "loop area" which can pick up noise.
The pearl of the dayNo doubt the most useful and succinct post on the topic that I've read this year. Maybe last year, too.
Thanks, Emile.
Steve Z
Thanks for the very informative post. It appears I may not understand the graphs well since what I notice is that for the LPS unit, there seems to be "ground" noise with a base of -10dB with spikes of up to 50, 40, 30 etc db every 10Hz starting at 50Hz (Fig 2) . Yet the SMPS has base ground noise at approximately -83dB with only a 10dB spike from 37-47KHz. Yet you suggest that the SMPS noise is the one more detrimental sonically, correct? If so, all else being equal, wouldn't the SMPS noise be easier to attenuate with a well-designed bandpass filter?Unfortunately it's not as simple as that. There are a lot of factors in play and as we as audiophiles are all just going by what sounds best to us at any given point in time, complicated by the fact that, assuming our ears are reliable evaluation tools, that we tend to not re-evaluate previous system changes after introducing the next system change. On top of that something which sounds better to us does not mean it it lowers noise. You could easily cascade a series of noise increasing system changes which all sound better to you, till you reach problematic noise levels.
Grounding is one of those areas where you can easily "go wrong" technically, every additional ground wire/path you add has the potential to create an additional earth loop area which can pickup noise. So let's take the switch and router as an example, you can add a ground wire between router and switch which would reduce the current on the DAC cable shield between router and switch, the larger the gauge of the ground wire, the lower the current on the DAC cable shield would be. This could in turn decrease coupling to the signal carrying conductors, BUT you change the earth loop area and you may increase susceptibility to external EMI field coupling which can in turn couple into your system. The more ground wires you have, the higher the likeliness of this becoming a problem. As tweaking grounding is very popular with audiophiles this can become a very large factor in systems with ground wires and earth loops everywhere. This adds to the difficulty in predicting which types of noise are wreaking the most havoc in a system.
Additionally all noise on your safety earth ground, does not "flow to ground" as people tend to think. It just travels everywhere, through all earth wiring in your home and to all equipment connected to it. Now there are lots of "grounding" products claiming to dissipate this noise, but that's really not something you can just do, but even if they could, all that noise would still be there, just perhaps reduce in level faster, or perhaps with reduced harmonics, but I should add this is a big IF, for clarity, I'm not trying to dismiss audible improvements stemming from these devices, I've personally build and even sold some of these, and they do exert an effect, sometimes very profound. Anyway, all this additional wiring will have noise riding on it, create additional loops which can pickup external noise, which can then couple to your components / signal wiring again.
Taking a screenshot from the link I posted earlier in this thread :
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/InfoComm-Grounding2012.pdf
View attachment 109111
This would indeed be typical for the noise spectrum on your home safety ground, this noise spectrum will also be present on your "ground" wires, component chassis, cable shields etc, for a deeper dive in some of the mechanics I again recommend reading that link.
Let's dig into this a little bit further with a few old measurements I took myself which I probably posted in this thread aswell.
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a Linear Power supply, this is caused by the current draw when charging a capacitor bank:
View attachment 109112
Noise spectrum imposed on "ground" from a SMPS, with a ~37-47KHz noise spectrum, probably has "spread spectrum" applied at a ~42KHz switching frequency:
View attachment 109113
The point of sharing these is that both a LPS and a SMPS cause "ground noise", more supplies = more noise, but SMPS noise is considered more harmful to sound (with which I agree). Both types of noise will find their way into our systems, and now we're ONLY looking at noise created by power supplies themselves without actually powering something which can significantly change this noise spectrum.
Add a lot of ground wires everywhere, add ground loops, and you can see how unpredictable everything becomes.
Ideally you'd have an expert at system grounding, for example for recording studios, design your system grounding for you. But the kicker is, you may not even like the resulting sound, as technically superior does not mean (subjectively) better sound.
And to actually answer your question, indeed a "ground loop" is not the same thing as a "loop area" which can pick up noise.
Thanks for the very informative post. It appears I may not understand the graphs well since what I notice is that for the LPS unit, there seems to be "ground" noise with a base of -10dB with spikes of up to 50, 40, 30 etc db every 10Hz starting at 50Hz (Fig 2) . Yet the SMPS has base ground noise at approximately -83dB with only a 10dB spike from 37-47KHz. Yet you suggest that the SMPS noise is the one more detrimental sonically, correct? If so, all else being equal, wouldn't the SMPS noise be easier to attenuate with a well-designed bandpass filter?