Mike, Thanks for that report. Those must be two quite nice combinations. You keep referring to the Saskia v. the NVS. Do you attribute most of the sound from the two respective cartridge/arm/turntable combinations to be mainly from the two turntables? I would think that the two arms being from the same designer and at the top of his range might be fairly similar, but that the two cartridges and tables might be somewhat different, but it is really hard to know. I look forward to when you can compare the same cartridge/arm combination on each of the tables. You may then be able to attribute specific attributes to each of the individual components.
I also find interesting that you describe a particular combination to be better with a particular genre of music. Large scale (classical) v. small jazz combo, for instance. I had been of the opinion that one combination should be favored by a particular listener and then sound great on everything, but, the more I hear in my own system, friends' systems and from reading, I am increasingly open to components being specialized. (Edit: and now Tang mentions it in the post above, right now). Recently, I have begun to think about why that is the case. People with multiple tables, cartridges, tonearms often describe one combination sounding particularly good with a particular type of music. Same for speakers.
I have a friend who describes cartridges as either having the "Japanese" or the "European" sound. Both of the cartridges in this report are "European". He describes the Japanese cartridges as "aiming to please" and the European cartridges (Ortofon and vdH) as being all about resolution and accuracy. From my limited exposure to cartridges, my AirTight Supreme and vdH Colibri XPP do conform, more or less, to his general description, with my MSL Sig. Gold being somewhere in between. Do you find that Japanese and European cartridges can be described in these general ways?