Several people have asked about the size of the sweet spot. I don't know exactly as I have not turned and integrated the right speaker yet. But every speaker i have had has a sweet spot that is one seat wide. The person who would sit to my left will hear mostly the left speaker and the person sitting to my right will hear mostly the right speaker. Each person needs to decide what they want. Do they want a everyone in the room to have listenable music or do they want for their experience to be the best it can be. I personally aim to maximize the sound experience in the main listening chair.
You are writing as if it is a black or white affair. Stereo intrinsically has a sweet spot - it is one of the intrinsic drawbacks of the system. In real life we do not have such sweet spot - we can move in a jazz club or life recital without significant variance of sound acoustics. However the effects of moving vary a lot depending of speaker - in some speakers we need to keep the head in a vice, as side movements make disruptions in sound quality, in others variations are more continuous and although we still have the best in the middle position we do feel locked in position. It is why I asked about the sweet spot.
If someone want a "party" system then go ahead and push the speakers back close to the wall and point them straight ahead. The speakers will then spray sound all around the room. What you would be listening too is mostly the room. I have no idea why anyone would spend money on a state of the art speaker system to do this but different people have different priorities.
Surely this is an extreme case, not typical of high-end stereo. Stereo needs the room reflections and contribution - but the interesting case are just the intermediate situations. BTW, with the proper set up, the SoundLabs have a wide sweet spot and I consider them state of the art.