Then why did you buy expensive power cords which you justified as needing 9ft cords? You could have bought wire at The Home Depot for $1/ft and terminated them with $4 plugs. Hmm, so who is stuffing the Christmas stockings?
Your pseudoscience guy is selling used horse oats by the bucket and you and his followers drink it up thinking you are clever because it tastes just as good as steak and lobster.
Whose really being ripped off? The ones that refuse to experience something different just because it is expensive or the ones who discover new joys that yes, sometimes come at the expense disappointment. Learning is expensive- and I don’t just mean college tuition. The school of hard knocks makes me appreciate the great discoveries even more.
Oh, in the past I definitely drank the Kool Aid. I started out learning about this hobby by reading the usual journals, and bought most stuff after reading positive reviews. My unfulfilled need from reviews is that the reviewer didn’t suggest a likely synergistic system in which the reviewed item would work synergistically.
As time went on, my system ended up being made up of diverse items which had been reviewed positively in the journals, but didn’t work together. Not knowing enough, I suspected one of the reviews was incorrect, but which? This led to randomly changing cables, components, then buying higher-priced speakers each of which reviewed well in the usual journals (I was the embodiment of Sisyphus in Albert Camus’ book).
This was the problem. Every review piece of equipment had something good written about it (even if just “hits above its weight category” or “a good choice in its price range”), nothing bad. Likewise, the issue in which an article was reviewed also had several advertisements for that same item. I’m not saying, out loud anyway, that just because the magazine is making money from advertising that specific piece of equipment that the review is suspect, but … and then you have the OP of this thread, the dealer for all the items being discussed, answering each technical question put to him with a video that he made to sell the product…
After too many years of this, I have heard systems that were (and still are) great in the past (triodes and horns, ESLs, certain turntables and LPs), and the more modern systems (detail-oriented, digital) that some hanker after today and have chosen the mostly vintage route.
I no longer listen to merchants selling their wares but do respect the views of other silver-backs who have real knowledge through real experience, hence my subscribing to this user group.
Unfortunately, I allowed myself to be sucked into this thread. I tried to share lessons learned, even though I knew that I was going to be attacked for pointing out the Emperor wasn’t wearing any clothes. You can lead a horse to water but …
Not that every argument by those who drink the Kool aid is not useful. Your admitting that green marker around the edge of CDs does nothing confirmed my own experience, however your belief in the use of a demagnetiser on CDs making a huge difference to the sound quality I’ll take with a grain of salt.
When I put up a Shakti stone advertisement for all to consider, Ron challenged me with a “got you” question, had I done tests and what were the measurements of equipments before and after adding Shakti stones, or something to that effect. That was just to shut me up, he didn’t offer any knowledge based upon his experience. Just being a smart arse; I asked him how huge the improvement in sound and picture was after placing a Shakti stone atop his TV? No response.
Ok, I will abstain from further comments on this thread.