US Anti-Doping Agency charges Armstrong

Another ex team mate of lance speaks ,although with a bit different opinion , Chris Horner.
It looks to me that lance being the protected leader of the team had a lot off very jealous teammembers to begin with :

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/10/news/horner-says-he-never-saw-doping-on-bruyneel-teams_261673

According to him lance is a scapegoat

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/chris-horner-i-dont-believe-armstrong-cheated
I agree...Lance made millions with his victories...I wonder how Hamilton an Hincape made out ? Not too well I suspect. Great opportunity for sour grapes.
 
Hi

The end justify the means philosophy has permeated many a post in this thread .. We'll survive, so will Lance but his legacy has been severely tarnished. Hero he is no longer for most. Legacy, can't be bought or salvaged with millions.
 
Well see how clean he comes or is it sugar coated. Wonder how much Oprah is paying him?

FWIW, Marion Jones never really came clean on her cheating.

Look for a tearful confession. To go on Oprah when the whole world knows you are guilty as hell and try to use it as a platform for more denials would be the stupidest PR stunt in entertainment history.
 
Whats being missed in all of this is the USADA abuse of power and significant witchhunt on a Citizen , 15 yrs after the fact. Watching the Interview on CBS 2 nights ago , that dude (Tygart) has a serious personal axe and man crush on Armstrong, the interview and His one sided unsupported incendiary attacks only added to the suggestion of how facist in nature the USADA and it's President have really become ...
 
I'm glad that I don't watch Oprah, ever! ...Well, few very short glimpses about thirteen years ago.

* But I'll check on the Internet though (don't have cable TV, no satellite, no TV at all).
 
AP source: Armstrong 'sorry' to Livestrong staff

By JIM VERTUNO

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) -- Lance Armstrong stopped at his Livestrong Foundation before heading to an interview with Oprah Winfrey on Monday and delivered an emotional apology to staff members, some of whom broke down in tears, a person with direct knowledge of the meeting told The Associated Press.
The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussion was private.
Stripped last year of his seven Tour de France titles because of doping charges, Armstrong addressed the staff and said, ''I'm sorry.'' The person said the disgraced cyclist choked up and several employees cried during the session.
The person also said Armstrong apologized for letting the staff down and putting Livestrong at risk but he did not make a direct confession to the group about using banned drugs. He said he would try to restore the foundation's reputation, and urged the group to continue fighting for the charity's mission of helping cancer patients and their families.
After the meeting, Armstrong, his legal team and close advisers gathered at a downtown Austin hotel for the interview. The cyclist was to make a limited confession to Winfrey about his role as the head of a long-running scheme to dominate the Tour with the aid of performance-enhancing drugs, a person with knowledge of the situation has told the AP.
Shortly before the interview began around 1 p.m. local time, nearly a dozen of Armstrong's closest friends and advisers gathered in the hotel lobby and were escorted to the room where the taping was taking place.
The group included Armstrong attorneys Tim Herman and Sean Breen, along with Bill Stapleton, Armstrong's longtime agent, manager and business partner. All declined comment.
Winfrey and her crew had earlier said they would film the session, to be broadcast Thursday, at Armstrong's home. As a result, local and international news crews were encamped near the cyclist's Spanish-style villa before dawn.
Armstrong still managed to slip away for a run despite the crowds outside his home. He returned by cutting through a neighbor's yard and hopping a fence.
During a jog on Sunday, Armstrong talked to the AP for a few minutes saying, ''I'm calm, I'm at ease and ready to speak candidly.'' He declined to go into specifics.
Armstrong lost all seven Tour titles following a voluminous U.S. Anti-Doping Agency report that portrayed him as a ruthless competitor, willing to go to any lengths to win the prestigious race. USADA chief executive Travis Tygart labeled the doping regimen allegedly carried out by the U.S. Postal Service team that Armstrong once led, ''The most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen.''
Yet Armstrong looked like just another runner getting in his roadwork when he talked to the AP, wearing a red jersey and black shorts, sunglasses and a white baseball cap pulled down to his eyes. Leaning into a reporter's car on the shoulder of a busy Austin road, he seemed unfazed by the attention and the news crews that made stops at his home. He cracked a few jokes about all the reporters vying for his attention, then added, ''but now I want to finish my run,'' and took off down the road.
The interview with Winfrey will be Armstrong's first public response to the USADA report. Armstrong is not expected to provide a detailed account about his involvement, nor address in depth many of the specific allegations in the more than 1,000-page USADA report.
In a text to the AP on Saturday, Armstrong said: ''I told her (Winfrey) to go wherever she wants and I'll answer the questions directly, honestly and candidly. That's all I can say.''
After a federal investigation of the cyclist was dropped without charges being brought last year, USADA stepped in with an investigation of its own. The agency deposed 11 former teammates and accused Armstrong of masterminding a complex and brazen drug program that included steroids, blood boosters and a range of other performance-enhancers.
Once all the information was out and his reputation shattered, Armstrong defiantly tweeted a picture of himself on a couch at home with all seven of the yellow leader's jerseys on display in frames behind him. But the preponderance of evidence in the USADA report and pending legal challenges on several fronts apparently forced him to change tactics after more a decade of denials.
He still faces legal problems.
Former teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of the 2006 Tour de France title for doping, has filed a federal whistle-blower lawsuit that accused Armstrong of defrauding the U.S. Postal Service. The Justice Department has yet to decide whether it will join the suit as a plaintiff.
The London-based Sunday Times also is suing Armstrong to recover about $500,000 it paid him to settle a libel lawsuit. On Sunday, the newspaper took out a full-page ad in the Chicago Tribune, offering Winfrey suggestions for what questions to ask Armstrong. Dallas-based SCA Promotions, which tried to deny Armstrong a promised bonus for a Tour de France win, has threatened to bring yet another lawsuit seeking to recover more than $7.5 million an arbitration panel awarded the cyclist in that dispute.
The lawsuit most likely to be influenced by a confession might be the Sunday Times case. Potential perjury charges stemming from Armstrong's sworn testimony in the 2005 arbitration fight would not apply because of the statute of limitations. Armstrong was not deposed during the federal investigation that was closed last year.
Many of his sponsors dropped Armstrong after the damning USADA report - at the cost of tens of millions of dollars - and soon after, he left the board of Livestrong, which he founded in 1997. Armstrong is still said to be worth about $100 million.
Livestrong might be one reason Armstrong has decided to come forward with an apology and limited confession. The charity supports cancer patients and still faces an image problem because of its association with Armstrong. He also may be hoping a confession would allow him to return to competition in the elite triathlon or running events he participated in after his cycling career.
World Anti-Doping Code rules state his lifetime ban cannot be reduced to less than eight years. WADA and U.S. Anti-Doping officials could agree to reduce the ban further depending on what information Armstrong provides and his level of cooperation.
 
ESPN is reporting Lance admits to using PEDs.

Still no positive test ;)
 
the question remains . How did he beat the tests? Maybe he'll tell Oprah.
 
the question remains . How did he beat the tests? Maybe he'll tell Oprah.

Did you read Tyler Hamilton's book? If not, do so :)
 
Anyone still think there is a conspiracy?

I never thought there was a conspiracy. I would hope this would show drug tests are not infallible. That's an issue I have been fighting for a long time.
 
Did you read Tyler Hamilton's book? If not, do so :)

Failed Doper boy turned snitch Hamilton , you have way too much time on your hands Myles, you should use it to read stereophile .... :rolleyes:



"Tyler Hamilton will make more money from his book describing how he cheated than I will make in all my years of honest labour,” she said, aiming her first blow at the American who failed three drugs tests and denied them all before selling his explosive memoirs.

“Please don’t reward people like Hamilton with money. That is the last thing he needs. Donate his literary prize and earnings to charity. There are many places infinitely more deserving than the filthy hands of Hamilton.”

-Nicole Cooke.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu