VAC 452 iQ review in Stereophile
- Thread starter microstrip
- Start date
Kondo souga on a 97 db speaker is probably a wrong combination, just a guess as I heard neither, but viva on Alexandria, for sure, a SS will be better suited for the speaker.
Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you wrote that you respect Michael Fremer’s ears and that with Wilson solid state is obvious. Could you please clarify? I thought you meant that with Wilson speakers one should use SS amps in you opinion.
Last edited:
IMHO, considering that the harmonic distortion spectra of SS amplifiers is very different from tube amplifiers, we can not compare a SS clipping point at THD of 1% with a tube clipping point.
Anyaway the "better" sounding NHB 468 measures very differently:
With that caution in mind and with "clipping" defined as when the THD+noise reaches 1%, I found that the NHB-468 clipped at 216W into 16 ohms (26.2dBW, fig.4), 398W into 8 ohms (26.0dBW, fig.5), 205W into 4 ohms (201.1dBW, fig.6), and 101W into 2 ohms (140dBW, fig.7).
Another interesting comment from the Stereophile review:
Hervé had also predicted that, as the NHB-468 has no global negative feedback, there would be "plenty of THD for John."
Although I would not risk a technical explanation about it the Vivaldi DAC with its astonishing signal to noise ration sounds much "cleaner" and informative in detail and soundstage than any other DAC I have tried, even with noisy tube amplifiers.
I think you miss the objective of high-end manufacturers - to create great sounding amplifier that create great audio experiences when coupled to adequate systems. Even F. Toole in his book acknowledges that professionals and audio customers have different preferences. Nelson Pass has a great sentence in his manuals - "Our real customers care most about the experience they get when they sit down to listen to their music. We create amplifiers that we like to listen to, on the assumption that we share similar taste. "
Unfortunately it is does not reflect the current state of high-end audio. An informative article, but a childish analysis of tube distortion, ignoring the efforts and improvements of audio designers along decades. The tittle is just a way of attracting readers attention. Since long we know that plots of THD versus power or frequency are not enough to seriously analyze sound quality.
IMHO we should analyze the high-end considering the best of it, not the garbage minority.
BTW, most deep pocket audiophiles I know about are extremely careful and hard to please, demanding and critical. However audio forums love stereotypes and focus on the gullible consumers.
If none of the known standards for quality are relevant or matter, then what criteria is one to use to asses a components performance? The ability to “create great audio experiences when coupled to adequate systems“????? Now that is vague, uninformed and imbecile.
Last edited:
You simply are not accepting our standard of subjective proximity of reproduced sound to the sound of acoustic music performed live.
I accept that standard for a system but not for a component. A component should be evaluated against its published specifications. Ironically enough, go back and read Francisco’s original post to start this thread. He makes a good observation and then appears to argue against its validity.
Agreed. And when I've heard the Vac 450s on Magico several times, there is no grunt or shove which just happens to be the big flaw in the measurements at 4 ohms. Wimpy "big" amps.,
Yes, taken out of the high-end context it can seem vague, uninformed and imbecile. However, considering that the correlation between the "known standards for quality " and subjective sound quality is very poor, it is still the more reliable source of information we have.
Last edited:
I sometimes do not agree with the observations of our esteemed "time traveller" and resident Audio scribe Ked but I'm tempted to state my
point as he quotes above-after all calling a spade a spade has made him a character on the Site and a seemingly knowledgable and
combined with his inquisitive nature makes for interesting posts if he occasionally comes across a tad pedantic
!Shades of Moi 40 years ago
!Enough of the frivolity--yes the VTL sound he witnessed--sadly I have to agree with that
Harking back to 93/94(?) the Stereophile show at LAX --the VTL Source tape demo with Klipschorns--well it was rather bad
I mentioned this to Eva Anna--she agreed with me-- Since then I've always taken the opportunity to hear VTL's both at shows and private houses but
I'm afraid I've never got to grips with the sonics -- VTL have always sounded slow and thickish to me too.
This was exemplified in the Wilson demo pictured where try as I may I could not feel the music coming out of the boxes-it seemed strained on the crescendos and yes it was being played loud--but not an emotive feel--just as I wrote above--sad but true.
So I have to agree with Ked's quote and to a similar point made by MikeL -based on what I've heard.
But before we go and throw the baby out with the bathwater--even top end SS can prove to show its undoing--
Fact- in 96 Myself and Troy Koslovich(RIP) were setting a up a pair of X-I Slamms I insisted we used Cello Performance II monos--
Joe Cali agreed to let me "borrow" a set with the Palette /etc--well after two days of warmup/ burning in teeth gnashing( the Client
)the esteemed Cellos couldn't deliver --no drive, restrained and "choked" on heavy transients( apologies to the Power Supply)
I had to return them--Troy had some monster Krells delivered and up went the needles--power to burn and the Speakers became lease Breakers
Client happy!-Moi ate humble pie-- and lived to fight another day!
Moral-not all SS with amazing specs like the Cello's in this instance will deliver as required also.
However back on the track -- not ALL tubes are to be written off as well--listen ( I have)to the XLFs in Steve's wonderful sound with tubes!
This is the object definitive that the humble Vacuum that can still pass musical information has its place--just choose carefully
BruceD
I reported facts taken from Stereophile reviews. However as I have direct experience with both versions of the Momentum preamplifier and the second version really sounds much better than the first one, I am forced to acknowledge that until better types of measurement are presented and become norm the subjective ability to sound great in a system is a better and more useful information to consumers.
I'm old enough to remember when the whole tube world went Halcro, too. How did that end up.
Audiophiles are fickle.
BTW, I am currently listening to the XLFs with the Siegfried II's - fabulous sound in pentode mode, mid set damping. IMHO much better sound than any solid state that I have owned or hosted, although I never tried the late Momentums, just the original models.
As far as I remember, in my system, only the ARC REF750s surpassed the Siegfried it in its instantaneous delivery of power, tracery and presence, but the 40 expensive tubes and 1600W at idle were not acceptable for me.
As far as I remember, in my system, only the ARC REF750s surpassed the Siegfried it in its instantaneous delivery of power, tracery and presence, but the 40 expensive tubes and 1600W at idle were not acceptable for me.
it's a balance, Mike. there doesn't have to be a 100% objectivist vs 100% subjectivist POV.
Respectfully, I think you got off at the wrong train stop. This is the WhatsBestForum Subjective Review stop. You want the old Stereo Review station, I think.
Carlos, you obviously don’t get it... likely not one person here takes your position at all seriously, they’re just being polite because they love this debate indeed more than any other.
Everyone here has been down the little objectivist rabbit hole and back again more than a few times and I’d suggest all have left the naive basic measurements position in the lost and unfound box of overly simplistic notions on understanding how people hear and how they perceive.
It’s an achingly familiar ground hog day of tired old chestnuts and cheap grist for the mill.
I’d genuinely humbly submit that only an imbecile would actually use the word imbecile in a forum and think that made them anything other than an imbecile... having used the word three times now in brief succession I certainly rest my case lol.
There are few actively in this thread that can’t demonstrate considerable experience or would likely feel at all threatened by your position here at all. The arguments are all familiar and I’d doubt you’ll get many buying into these after years of most simply having tried and learned better.
To be honest I’d rather someone cough on me at the moment than go another round on this carousel again so I’m happily out but I’d also agree that if your looking to a fundamentalist objectivist platform here I’d suggest that you’ve signed onto the wrong roadshow.
Batter away, there’ll always be someone here who wants to take their wordsmithing ways out for a quick predictable spin or even some for another Quixotic marathon of most excellent windmill fighting.
Similar threads
