As long as the tone of the original instrument comes through convincingly then that's real tone. If it somehow gets "enhanced" it is more to do with the "tone" of the actual speaker, like an AN/E or various other loudspeakers with questionable accuracy e.g. quite a large number of lesser horns.
The MBLs I don't like at all. Real music is not thin and transparent. It is transparent and dense. GP does that. Also these kind of set ups can't be heard at shows.
Agree with the apogees, so one has to make an offer for a speaker he has heard.
Chat later guys, about to watch Rattle and the LSO do symphony fantastique (berlioz)
Thanks for the report. Meeting outstanding people and listening to their great systems and is a hobby in its own right. Out of curiosity, how much have you spent on these kinds of adventures?
Also, curious as what your definition of "dense" is. Obviously definitions are determined by tastes and references.
A rich, powerful midbass is one of my main fetishes and that's why I own the speaker. Also, tonality needs to be right for me - no thin amps like Sanders can do. Currently run mine with 4 very powerful class a monos just for the dynamics and tonality. But curious as where you are coming from.
Hi Caesar, that's interesting. I have heard them with MBL 2008 and 2011 amps, spectral dma 360, and ypsilon integrated. They sounded the best with Spectral.
I think 4 class A amps would be a step above and I can see you could possibly get a denser sound.
I have also heard them couple of years ago with Levinson