Why?I have been circling the idea of bypassing the fuse with a hard wire. Instead, I would build a Multi 9 circuit breaker into the power supply. They are thermal/magnetic so they trip on shorts and overloads. You can get them at .5 amps and up.
Why?I have been circling the idea of bypassing the fuse with a hard wire. Instead, I would build a Multi 9 circuit breaker into the power supply. They are thermal/magnetic so they trip on shorts and overloads. You can get them at .5 amps and up.
Fools and their money comes to mind with this.
Thought I’d seen it all, but apparently not.
Thought I’d seen it all, but apparently not.
I have been circling the idea of bypassing the fuse with a hard wire. Instead, I would build a Multi 9 circuit breaker into the power supply. They are thermal/magnetic so they trip on shorts and overloads. You can get them at .5 amps and up.
That's too much, unbelievable.
Or the 14k XLR interconnects that use $10 per pair Neutrik connectors...seriously?
EDIT: even worse, the company claims "self produced own sockets for Best Sound Quality (world's first)"
That's a Neutrik connector with a custom ring, but that's it. It's not built from the ground up. If they don't even bother with making the entire connector, that means it uses the stock Neutrik brass pins, which are OK for $10 but far from high end.
Cables make a big difference in sound, and good things are, usually, expensive, but this is
That's too much, unbelievable.
Or the 14k XLR interconnects that use $10 per pair Neutrik connectors...seriously?
EDIT: even worse, the company claims "self produced own sockets for Best Sound Quality (world's first)"
That's a Neutrik connector with a custom ring, but that's it. It's not built from the ground up. If they don't even bother with making the entire connector, that means it uses the stock Neutrik brass pins, which are OK for $10 but far from high end.
Cables make a big difference in sound, and good things are, usually, expensive, but this is preposterous.
Because your running a big fat 10 awg $3000 power cord to your amp, only to choke it through a 30 awg hair thin wire. Why not keep it all fat current carrying conductor and protect the amp with a circuit breaker containing elements designed to carry 20 amps, but set to trip at 1.5 amps or 3 amps or whatever your gear is specified as. You get way more current flow with the same equipment protection.Why?
Yes, all my fuses are bypassed with copper foil from a Mundorf inductor; the stock amp fuses were running warm, an indication of resistance. I haven't had an issue in some 5 years now. The chance of an internal fault is extremely low here; I am just looking at my 25-year old FM tuner for proof.I think ack has bypassed some of his fuses with hard wire if I recall correctly. For goodness sake, you can shove a piece of pure silver wire in there for probably less than a hundred bucks. Of course, it won't be "quantumized", whatever the heck that means.
Seriously, what is the problem in using parts of Neutrik connectors in these cables? Several well know cable companies do it - they just manufacture the critical parts or simply the cosmetic parts.
BTW, we must accept that pseudo technical literature in these matters is always just marketing. No one has been able to explain scientifically why cables sound so different, except when they are misused and introduce noise, distortions or changes in frequency response.
Interesting. So to ask the obvious question- if this is so clearly the way to go, why don't the big names do it?Because your running a big fat 10 awg $3000 power cord to your amp, only to choke it through a 30 awg hair thin wire. Why not keep it all fat current carrying conductor and protect the amp with a circuit breaker containing elements designed to carry 20 amps, but set to trip at 1.5 amps or 3 amps or whatever your gear is specified as. You get way more current flow with the same equipment protection.
My cable manufacturing friend designed both of our monoblock amps with 5 amp fuses. He heard my blue Synergistic Research 8 amp equivalent fuses over the stock fuse and found it a fabulous improvement. So he replaced his fuse with a NOS 1960s 5 amp circuit breaker. Comparing the amps, they sound very similar now (same quality, very subtle difference). The problem he has which is why I'm not going to use his old circuit breakers is that they could fail to trip as they are really old and could take out his trannies. If I could find newer 5 amp circuit breakers which would fit the amps, I would change them.Because your running a big fat 10 awg $3000 power cord to your amp, only to choke it through a 30 awg hair thin wire. Why not keep it all fat current carrying conductor and protect the amp with a circuit breaker containing elements designed to carry 20 amps, but set to trip at 1.5 amps or 3 amps or whatever your gear is specified as. You get way more current flow with the same equipment protection.
LoL. And what gauge wire is inside the device, directly after the fuse - or in many cases just direct to PCB traces.Because your running a big fat 10 awg $3000 power cord to your amp, only to choke it through a 30 awg hair thin wire. Why not keep it all fat current carrying conductor and protect the amp with a circuit breaker containing elements designed to carry 20 amps, but set to trip at 1.5 amps or 3 amps or whatever your gear is specified as. You get way more current flow with the same equipment protection.
My amps have a lot of point to point wiring, and 1 circuit board. I would say the internal wiring is about 16 gauges larger than the fuse. Probably around 14 awg. The fuse in hair thin. Maybe 30 awg.LoL. And what gauge wire is inside the device, directly after the fuse - or in many cases just direct to PCB traces.
| |||||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | | |||||||||
| | |
Certainly a term that is used loosely in audio, but there are some outstanding products/technologies that use the "quantum" label, whether or not it is anything more than marketing, e.g., the outstanding Quantum Physics Noise Disruptor, Nordost's Quantum Resonance Technologies (QRT) products, and DHDI's "Quantum Acoustics".Heh ...
I confess to being something of an old-school Newtonian, tending to dismiss out of hand those audio products that use 'Quantum Science' in their name.
from that site:
Certainly a term that is used loosely in audio, but there are some outstanding products/technologies that use the "quantum" label, whether or not it is anything more than marketing, e.g., the outstanding Quantum Physics Noise Disruptor, Nordost's Quantum Resonance Technologies (QRT) products, and DHDI's "Quantum Acoustics".
I have one of the 'yellow' fuses coming next week.there's an old expression in medicine that goes...'if you don't look , you don't find'...Perhaps. Doesn't say much for their marketing directors, imo. If a product is truly excellent regardless of its operational boundaries why burden it with a name that arouses scepticism?