I'm really curious about the tweak noted here. The use of stillpoints/HRS and 45lbs of damping...really? Can you tell me more about your perception of the magnitude of change in the dynamics. It appears from the photo that you have placed this weight right on top of the "can" behind the resistor punch board. Is that correct. ...and how did you come up with this idea...wow
Also curious about the magnitude of the result from the use of the silver isolation wraps on the inter speaker cabling. It sounds extreme but I'm listening
thanks
Hi Barry1,
One of the observations I made of the original X1s as I got to know them over 10 years was that the exterior structure while excellent (particularly for its time) was not nearly as rigid as later generation Wilsons.
As a result, I found that selective focus on isolation, some [very careful/limited] areas of damping could help reduce the sense of 'shimmer' I sensed over time was in some way related to the cabinets. Of course, the design of the cabinets was always made with the knowledge that (being adjustable) they were going to move...and DW was a true engineer and knew his trade...nevertheless, I liked the selective changes I made to the speaker and they served us well for those years.
Fast forward to the XLF, and we looked at making a few of those same changes...knowing a number would not work (they did not). However, a few stuck:
1. By placing super-heavy Artesania dampers on top of the HRS over what is (I believe) where some of the crossover networks sit...I did find a very gentle sense of more focus/denser notes and again less sense of 'shimmer' from the music. The idea came from previous experience where isolation often helped elsewhere in the system...sometimes I have found smaller parts tend to be more sensitive to vibration - resistors, wiring, power supplies. And that is essentially where this sits relative to a lot of the other parts of the speaker which are generally heroically well built (and damped).
2. The Entreq wraps around the upper cables 'appear' to enable a slightly purer treble note (not more extended...just purer)
These are tweaks I made over time...I do not think they are must haves...but I like them. It takes time to get the weight right...too little and we felt we were wasting our time...but at that weight, it started to create that sense of quiet/focus/density very gently.
3. The Stillpoints U5s have been replaced by U7s (which I have heard a rumor from an industry professional were co-designed with Andy Payor of Rockport Technologies for whom I have a tremendous amount of respect). The U7s presented a surprisingly less treble focused clarity which the U5s did...more balanced and definitely cleaned up bass interactions with the floor even more.
Overall, the XLFs looks/feel far more solidly built than the original X1s which were from July 1994 (no surprises there)...and thus, these changes are all very nice incremental improvements for me. I would not undo them for sure. But I would not suggest anyone feel the burning need to do these unless they feel the rest of the system has a fully matured sound that you really like and are now simply trying to hone while still maintaining its primary character. Hope that helps.