Actually we count the time in number of posts and not in terms of days so 550 posts is sufficient time
Actually we count the time in number of posts and not in terms of days so 550 posts is sufficient time
well......the easy answer about what the ML3's don't do is best answered by saying that they cannot take the top off the system and just keep going and going with more scale and energizing each molecule in the room; which well serves quite a few types of recordings. the problem is that unless you hear what the 458's can do, there is no way to realize what is missing. and the musical experience consequences of what the 458's can do.
it would be like trying to explain what the ML3's do without actually hearing it.
and then there is the character of the ML3's which is a desired attribute, but also an artifact that is heard here and there. I have no illusions that SET lovers won't reject this school of thought, but there is no doubt the the ML3's 'enhance' the sound to some degree.....as lovely and emotionally engaging as that enhancement is. I love it too.
(...) it would be like trying to explain what the ML3's do without actually hearing it. (...)
Yes I met Bob and saw all the photographs of the Goldman systems that he has installed and I agree with you no presents on the forums. That’s just one example of many very expensive systems that are out there with no discussion so it may just be the same with the MM7 but I don’t know.
Surely you are mocking the SET lovers, micro. AR and Dartzeel are not SETs
Mike
Why are you using extremes to make a point If taking the top off the music is important for you then have at it. In between what you have written I fail to read any deficiencies of the amp.
Why is taking the top end off something so important. Something you do when playing music you often like to comment at what the meters in your amps are peaking at. I am not sure if or whether that is important.
Peter, I may be able to spread some light on this question. At our last a’phile meeting, I discussed with several other members this exact question. Several of the members knew some of the dealers involved in some of the largest purchases along with most of the reps as well. The answer was that a large number of very high end pieces are sold to....
and you may not believe this....
“Non-audiophiles”!!
What happens is that the customer’s interior designer needs to fill a space and has a very large budget to do so. Or, the customer walks in off the street, no experience whatsoever, and happens to fall in love with the BIG Speakers and all the gear presented, has to have it—- and has the budget. Done deal at that time.
This is amazingly far more prevalent than we would believe. Applies to the typical Goldman Sachs customer and the well to do physician, etc. This explains the fact that these folks aren’t on the forums, or for that matter visible to us at all...as frankly they are not in this hobby.
Do you know of any brick and mortar dealer that is demoing the MM7’s, I don’t. OTOH, Goldmund was presented this way, and so is Wilson, Magico, etc.,
Mike, why do you think the MM7's "get no respect"? I'm not disputing your observation, I am just wondering why. I often feel the same way about my turntable. I don't understand it. These particular components are never mentioned in the discussion. Is it about marketing, exposure, cost, buzz?
Does this small bubble of audiophile forums really give us a sense of what is happening out there? I mean there are many people with incredible systems and components who do not spend any time on the forums. They are out there and we are not aware of them or their systems. The Magico M Pro sold 50 pairs and perhaps two are ever discussed here. I think of all the top gear that my local dealer sells, and almost non of it goes to people who chat on sites like WBF. I think we are a very vocal minority.
the answers to these type questions are never simple... ...all they do is sound better than just about any other speaker......and that seems not to be enough to be a difference.
Mike,
In my experience of having the MM3s (+Exact) in th store for almost 3 years, the main problem was not so much the size, but the red color. I've had long conversations with Jonathan (and Kevin) about this, so hopefully something will be done. It was almost a clean 50/50 split when folks came to the store and listened, some preferring the Evolutions, and others preferring the other speaker line. But almost 100% of them said they'd have problems bringing the Evolution home becausee of the red color. I've had folks who couldn't even manage the Micro Ones, because they were "too red" as well...
Of course I don't agree with all that, but that's been my experience. Hopefully something will be done, and our beloved speaker line will get the respect it deserves
As for your LAMM situation, I completely get it. It's not about "which one's best", but "what do I want to listen right now?" Having multiple setups in the store gives me this freedom and possibility, so I totally understand you wanting to have the same at home. But I guess it's in the nature of this forum, if not the hobby, to find an absolute best...
the answers to these type questions are never simple.
I'd say marketing is one significant issue. Evolution Acoustics has not been much of a brick and mortar brand. MM7's have never been displayed at a show. so they are not well known, and little has been done to promote them. Evolution Acoustics is little known in Europe or Asia. they have not been to Munich. and they are visually not changed since the MM3 was introduced in late 2005. and it's so hard to define 'sexy' when it comes to speakers, or any product. what goes into making a product a subject of conversation.
there have been zero magazine reviews, or even web hifi reviews either.
secondarily, maybe the visuals of the speaker are not as easy to blend into a room as some others. the massive size and reddish color maybe is polarizing to some degree. big black boxes, or more svelte type cabinetry is easier to appeal to a wider audience. the build quality is first rate, and the customer support is outstanding. and obviously they perform and offer such a wide array of attributes and system synergy advantages.
for whatever reason, all they do is sound better than just about any other speaker......and that seems not to be enough to be a difference.
The lack of commitment and trust between employers and employees makes this an adversarial relationship with employees totally willing to go work for their competitors for a decent raise. No pensions anymore, etc... It's just not a pleasant environment here in the US anymore.