No, just similar or close topology for the sub amp but definitely it's best to use the exact same amplification if we're talking about bi-amping.
david
That makes sense. Thanks again.
No, just similar or close topology for the sub amp but definitely it's best to use the exact same amplification if we're talking about bi-amping.
david
Keith, I know I’m speaking to a Zu enthusiast (despite you ditching LOL the brand).
They’re soon to release their assault on the high end, incl carbon fibre impregnated birch cabinet, similar carbon fibre impregnation of paper cones of the FRDs, both of these approaches for the purpose of maxxing stiffness while minimising weight, 4x 12” subs per spkr.
TOTL Radian supertweeters. All drivers incl subs high efficiency, the FRDs in excess of 101dB, the subs just short of 100. Two subs per spkr tuned for impact/snap, two for warmth/bloom. High quality on board subs amps replacing current models Hypex, w facility to bypass w external amp of user’s choice, Duelund caps to high- and low-pass filters, Lundahls transformers to sub amps. Approx 60”x18”x20”.
If this doesn’t add up to Zu breaking into a true high end sound, I’m not sure what more they need to do.
(And yes, I do know it’s the sound that will make it high end or not, not a list of design parameters).
with all this talk about how tubes on top and solid state on the bottom don't mix properly, jazdoc's comments, as both a confirmed tube guy, and person very familiar with my system might help. he thinks the bass is better now than before with the big darts.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...Lamm-ML3-and-darTZeel-458&p=497023#post497023
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...Lamm-ML3-and-darTZeel-458&p=497085#post497085
I'm sure your guesses as to how things integrate have more validity than jazdoc's actual experiences.
so many agendas here it makes me ill. I'm just trying to explain what I'm hearing. then the spin doctors get going. so much turf to defend. :-(
. . .
so many agendas here it makes me ill. I'm just trying to explain what I'm hearing. then the spin doctors get going.
Keith, you’re the one who asked why there aren’t any high end high efficiency spkrs. My post was my response to you that soon there will be one.
For whatever reason you are coming to a lot of false conclusions about the Evolution Acoustics speakers. Do you have any factual data to back up anything that you were saying at all? As the owner of Evolution Acoustics all I can say Is you were incorrect on virtually everything you said.For whatever reason people are coming to a lot false conclusions about Mike's Yin & Yang and at the risk of Chumming and restarting the frenzy a 96db figure doesn't say anything about a speaker and any assumption based solely on that number is wrong! I have a lot of experience with Accuton drivers and while they can sound nice and pretty with tubes and some low wattage they need current to come to life. Those 11" ceramic woofer's current demands aren't far off ribbon panels and ribbon tweeters of that size also need juice to sparkle. You can't compare the MM7 to Steve's Wilson's which are true high sensitivity design and lose little or nothing when paired with high end SETs like the ML3s. This isn't a case of Lamm's running out of steam with a high sensitivity speaker, on the EA you'll even find a 300w tube amp lacking compared to an equivalent high current SS amplifier, one has to make choices here. There's another fly in the ointment which I'm not sure how aware of Mike is right now. He's fine tuned the system with the Darts for years and matched the subs to his amps, it will be very difficult to integrate the bass of a plate amp with a SET's low end. Personally I found it impossible to blend these too technologies and have a fully coherent integrated sonic fabric.
david
For whatever reason you are coming to a lot of false conclusions about the Evolution Acoustics speakers. Do you have any factual data to back up anything that you were saying at all? As the owner of Evolution Acoustics all I can say Is you were incorrect on virtually everything you said.
David K's comment on the ceramic driver issue begs the question it may've been prudent for him to confer with Mike BEFORE M purchased the Lamms-no?
and stating the facts as he knew them relating to a possible "mismatch".
I trial before committing may have saved the Angst and conjecture.
BruceD
For whatever reason you are coming to a lot of false conclusions about the Evolution Acoustics speakers. Do you have any factual data to back up anything that you were saying at all? As the owner of Evolution Acoustics all I can say Is you were incorrect on virtually everything you said.
What am I wrong about Jonathan, the subs aren't active with class D amps? Or Mike didn't spend a lot of time fine tuning the subs to the Darts, his accounts of that are somewhere on the forum. Over the last 20 years I handled enough speakers with Accuton drivers to know their nature, it isn't a knock on the EA one way or another and you're welcome to disagree regarding their current needs but I have my own data points.
Alright! Ride’em cowboys; as we say in Texas...”Margaritas, chips!”
Cheers!
ALF
Alright! Ride’em cowboys; as we say in Texas...”Margaritas, chips!”
David K. having a any old random opinion, and that musing being objectively true, are two separate concepts. he is just a guy with a viewpoint, and turf to defend.
some how we are supposed to just accept David's thoughts as correct? he has his biases and fallibilities like anyone. lots of very smart guys here have opinions. and many of them disagree with each other. and the designers of our products are smart guys too, and lot's of eye rolls happen when they read some of this stuff.
and.....I did not consult David K. prior to buying the ML3's. he found out when I posted the original post on this thread.
Alright! Ride’em cowboys; as we say in Texas...”Margaritas, chips!”
Cheers!
ALF
There's no high noon here Allen . Do people disagree that higher current ss amplifiers bring something to the table with EA speakers?
david
What, no Limes, my friend !
What, no Limes, my friend !
Not even lemon peels! The other thing I said is that there's nothing in common between Wilson & EA speakers and that similar sensitivity figures don't make them the same, doubt anyone from either company will disagree.
david
David K's comment on the ceramic driver issue begs the question it may've been prudent for him to confer with Mike BEFORE M purchased the Lamms-no?
and stating the facts as he knew them relating to a possible "mismatch".
I trial before committing may have saved the Angst and conjecture.
BruceD
David K. having a any old random opinion, and that musing being objectively true, are two separate concepts. he is just a guy with a viewpoint, and turf to defend.
some how we are supposed to just accept David's thoughts as correct? he has his biases and fallibilities like anyone. lots of very smart guys here have opinions. and many of them disagree with each other. and the designers of our products are smart guys too, and lot's of eye rolls happen when they read some of this stuff.
and.....I did not consult David K. prior to buying the ML3's. he found out when I posted the original post on this thread.