It sounds like you had fun with Mike L's turntables, arms, cartridges, phonostage and table topologies.
No one likes criticism and you tend to strike back but, but hear me out. I am sure you are proud of your article, but someone needs to say this: You need to organize your thoughts and words much better and write for your reader. The reader should not have to be inside Bonzo's head to understand what he is trying to communicate. There is information in your article and obviously you had some nice insights but it is very difficult to describe so many different variables in a coherent way, which is why there are very very few reviews like this. You jump around so much and make so many references that this reader gave up keeping track of what you were saying, although I read to the end. Just because you have interesting side references, you don't have to include them - they became distractions from your main messages. I did not find your conclusions following from your write-up because it was too jumbled and did not lead me to them.
I don't want to be wholly negative. One way to tackle this sort of coverage is to look across the subject matter and your notes for common themes. Pick two or three at most. Take us stepwise through the gear inside those themes which can be organizers for your observations. Within each theme, take the same order of discussion. One sentence should lead to the next, not be orthogonal to it. An alternative to themes might be to do a section on tonearms and cartridges, another on tables, another on drive topology. I'm speculating here and it would take a fair amount of time to develop a plan for such a broad article. That does not mean to make it simpler just better organized. I will read it again to see if I change my mind, but that was first impression.
It was interesting to hear about Mike's gear and I liked the quality of the photos.
