Magico M6 and Tube Amp?
- Thread starter Ron Resnick
- Start date
Elliot G.
Industry Expert
what tube amp are you talking about. I have heard the VACS drive them very well and I heard the big ARC do that as well.
Last edited:
I’ve heard M6’s driven by ARC M160’s on two different occasions at the same dealer. Both times I felt that the amps simply couldn’t do the bass justice, that it felt like it “lagged” in the proceedings. The second time it was after the Magico sales manager had spent a day dialing the speakers in. In a sidebar with him, I mentioned my concern about bass lining up, and opined that a solid-state amp would probably suit the speaker better. He just gave me a knowing, but “no comment”, kind of look. I think they are a rather challenging speaker for tubes to drive.
Interesting topic Ron. What is motivating the question?
Madfloyd had big CAT monos and pre but prefers CH on his MPro, predecessor to the M6. When I had Magicos I used Pass SS. I preferred Lamm SS and that combination produced a natural sound. I did try my Lamm tubes and there was a magic but only on certain non demanding music when the amps were not pushed.
Madfloyd had big CAT monos and pre but prefers CH on his MPro, predecessor to the M6. When I had Magicos I used Pass SS. I preferred Lamm SS and that combination produced a natural sound. I did try my Lamm tubes and there was a magic but only on certain non demanding music when the amps were not pushed.
I'd try CAT or Jadis. CAT drives them for sure. Magico owns CAT Statements and hauls them to shows when they want to come across with a more natural presentation, as they did debuting the latest S3 model at axpona. ( Had they brought solid state, the S3 would have been panned as sounding analytical and hifi, I believe.)
JA 200s will handle Magico, maybe with challenges on ultimate bass grip playing rock or explosive jazz drum solos.
But heck, go all out for JA 500s, if you can
JA 200s will handle Magico, maybe with challenges on ultimate bass grip playing rock or explosive jazz drum solos.
But heck, go all out for JA 500s, if you can
Last edited:
Yes, even though the tone of the CAT was fine, the CH Precision are much more lively and dynamic on the M Project. I wonder if the M6 are at least marginally easier to drive.
Ron, what prompts the inquiry?
I always hoped that Magico would develop a more efficient speaker system. Maybe expand their horn speaker line. A two way front loaded horn with dual 15 or 18 inch woofers in the corner so it doesn’t have to be huge. First Watt is down the street.
I've heard them driven by big CAT monos, but cannot confirm the model. The sound was excellent in dynamic range, FR, and clarity -- at least I couldn't tell anything was missing. Mind you, this is an opinion formed after a few hours of casual listening & wine drinking!
I don't see how CAT will be better than CH except possibly on chamber where valve tone would have some advantages on initial listening. But CAT is not that level, unless andro is comparing (then it rises up a few levels)
What was challenging , the Sales Mgr or the amp ..?
I find both can be Challenging , but with the tubes , the best i have heard an M6 is on the big VAC’s mono’s , better than when i heard them on SS, unless you have them in a large room then the SS maybe better as they are power hungry like all Magico Speakers ..
Neither - - it's the speakers that are challenging (to drive). The best I've heard M6's was in a home setting with CH Precision M10 monos driving them. That was two years later than the tube experience, and with that SS power the bass lined up fine with the rest.
Correction, you tried them with Lamm HYBRIDS...Lamm does not make a pure SS amp.
Did you ever hear their big Horn speaker? I did twice..but with Pass labs...I got the feeling it was a lot of potential wasted...
I would take the CATs every day of the week and twice on Sunday on just about any speaker... IMO the tonality of the CH is simply not natural and without tone you don't really have music...the rest of the hifi traits become irrelevant. Mind you, I am only talking about a direct comparison of these two brands...not an absolute context but a relative one.
I d say keep the CAT and dump the vampire.( speaker)
Swap the CH for a Wadax front end .
CH overpriced stuff if it wasnt made in switserland they had to do at least a 30 % price drop.
Swap the CH for a Wadax front end .
CH overpriced stuff if it wasnt made in switserland they had to do at least a 30 % price drop.
Similar threads
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |