American Sound, "The Absolute Nothing"

cable manufacturers design and tune their interconnects with a 1-meter standard in mind. Any significant deviation from this—for instance, extending from 1 meter to 2 meters—is clearly audible. This is why interconnects should not exceed 1.5 meters.
Whew! Good thing I cannot hear a difference between 1 meter and 2 meters of the same interconnect in a blind A/B test! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Balle Clorin
Whether preamp is buffered or not, a significant change in the length of an interconnect is audible. Complications may arise if the preamplifier is not of sufficient quality, but no preamp can fully compensate for the increased length of an interconnect—for example, going from 1 meter to 2 meters. Or a huge difference from 1 meter to 5 meters.

You might think shorter is always better, but cable manufacturers design and tune their interconnects with a 1-meter standard in mind. Any significant deviation from this—for instance, extending from 1 meter to 2 meters—is clearly audible. This is why interconnects should not exceed 1.5 meters. If you don’t hear a difference, it’s likely due to either extremely low cable quality or a lack of transparency in your setup. Like it or not, there’s no other explanation. So, cable length is the issue and there is no preamp to cure that. And certainly balanced interconnects are not immune to this situation.

However, if you choose to accept the decrease in sound quality and opt for a 5-meter interconnect instead of 1 meter, there’s nothing inherently wrong with that choice. It’s akin to driving a car from the back seat—it works, but the experience is fundamentally different. The real problem arises if you claim that the sound quality remains unchanged.

So i ve got some more SQ to expect then
lol
Im using ( probably )20 year old 6 meter long interconnects stereo / cinch between my pre / power amp .

Mtemur u did like my vids so its probably due to the fact interconnects age like good wine/ whisky lol.

They cost around 30 euros at the time .
Would be now 40 euros due to inflation
 
Last edited:
So i ve got some more SQ to expect then
lol
Im using ( probably )20 year old 6 meter long interconnects stereo / cinch between my pre / power amp .

Mtemur u did like my vids so its probably due to the fact interconnects age like good wine/ whisky lol.

They cost around 30 euros at the time .
Would be now 40 euros due to inflation
Yes, I liked your videos if you switch to a higher quality 1 meter interconnect then it will sound better.
 
Whew! Good thing I cannot hear a difference between 1 meter and 2 meters of the same interconnect in a blind A/B test! :)
This depends on what kind of load is being driven and the current delivery capability of the output stage (pre).
 
If it has less impact on the belt, it means that it has less w&f from that point of view.
There are other opinions on this, for example that the motor needs a constant load in order to avoid any control interventions, a defined bearing friction and a lubricant that remains the same regardless of temperature.In the past, it has produced excellent results.
 
Doesn’t the stylus in the groove present a constant load for the motor, even if the bearing has extremely low friction? Perhaps those who are discussing breaking or constant load are talking about a greater force against which the motor must work.

As far as the theory goes, my understanding is that stylus in the groove does present a drag, and thus a load to the motor, but it is far from constant. The stylus drag actually changes considerable with different music passages, higher drag for louder passages and lower drag for softer passages. It is exactly this constantly changing drag creating a challenge to the motor / controller unit to maintain speed.

So, some designers believe a bearing with higher drag would mask the effect of this constantly changing stylus drag. For example, if the stylus drag would change between 1g and 2g (just pick a number for the discussion, I have no idea what the exact number is) and the bearing drag is 1g, then the total drag would be between 2g and 3g, a 50% difference, which could be harder for the motor / controller to maintain speed. However, if the bearing drag is 100g, then the resulting total drag of 101g to 102g, a less than 1% difference, would be a much more consistent load to the motor controller.

That is just my understanding of the theory, please correct me if I am wrong!
 
As far as the theory goes, my understanding is that stylus in the groove does present a drag, and thus a load to the motor, but it is far from constant. The stylus drag actually changes considerable with different music passages, higher drag for louder passages and lower drag for softer passages. It is exactly this constantly changing drag creating a challenge to the motor / controller unit to maintain speed.

So, some designers believe a bearing with higher drag would mask the effect of this constantly changing stylus drag. For example, if the stylus drag would change between 1g and 2g (just pick a number for the discussion, I have no idea what the exact number is) and the bearing drag is 1g, then the total drag would be between 2g and 3g, a 50% difference, which could be harder for the motor / controller to maintain speed. However, if the bearing drag is 100g, then the resulting total drag of 101g to 102g, a less than 1% difference, would be a much more consistent load to the motor controller.

That is just my understanding of the theory, please correct me if I am wrong!
Look at it this way. If you eat a lot of peas and carrots and then do a No. 1, if you're constipated and there is a lot of friction and drag on your poo, you might not notice the presence of those peas and carrots the same way than if you had a smooth No. 1. Both contain the same peas and carrots but the constipated poo masks their presence. Now ask yourself do you want smooth or rough?
 
Look at it this way. If you eat a lot of peas and carrots and then do a No. 1, if you're constipated and there is a lot of friction and drag on your poo, you might not notice the presence of those peas and carrots the same way than if you had a smooth No. 1. Both contain the same peas and carrots but the constipated poo masks their presence. Now ask yourself do you want smooth or rough?
Howie, many of you audio posts have references to bowl movements, is this your listening chair ? ;) IMG_3475.png
 
I think the 3012R is a great arm for the money but man there’s a whole world beyond it. Certainly not capable of bringing out the best in a turntable like this.
I’ve read this thread and others about the American Sound. As a polite disclaimer ‘A cat can look at a king’ insofar as this level of audio is in a stratosphere I can only dream of. I love the absolute no compromise design whereby clearly nothing has been left to chance and it’s an obvious culmination of all that the designer has learnt over the years. It’s intriguing his love for the 3012R and my humble question posed is - is it a case that the R is just a very fine synergistic match with these turntables or is the R a universal arm that reproduces the same magic elsewhere?
 
It’s intriguing his love for the 3012R and my humble question posed is - is it a case that the R is just a very fine synergistic match with these turntables or is the R a universal arm that reproduces the same magic elsewhere?

'Yes' for the AS2000 and The Absolute Nothing. 'It depends' for the rest of the universe. Do a search for '3012R' on this forum and other forums. It has a lot of users -- I have one on my Monaco (replaced a 4Point) -- but if there are no examples, you'll need to trial it out.
 
'Yes' for the AS2000 and The Absolute Nothing. 'It depends' for the rest of the universe. Do a search for '3012R' on this forum and other forums. It has a lot of users -- I have one on my Monaco (replaced a 4Point) -- but if there are no examples, you'll need to trial it out.
@tima
As I recall you used to have a 4Point and Triplanar. What led you to swap the Kuzma for a 3012R? Do you still use the Triplanar?
 
@tima
As I recall you used to have a 4Point and Triplanar. What led you to swap the Kuzma for a 3012R? Do you still use the Triplanar?

Yes, I still have a poorly functioning SME V, a Triplanar, and the latest 4Point along with armboards foe each.. I had the opportunity to try the 3012R and liked it alot. With the Aidas Mammoth Gold II I found the pairing more vivacious and weighty in the low end, with even better tonality and dynamics than I heard with that cartridge on my 4Point -- so I decided to keep the 3012R. This was after my Mammoth Gold review done with the 4Point which I still like with the Fuuga.
 
I've been reading the topic from the beginning and this made me laugh. You were probably joking when you wrote this?
I’m curious, even if others are not, to learn what about PeterA’s comment had you think he was joking. What was it?
 
In my humble opinion, the only thing that matters is how long the last turn takes.
Hi HB22,

Thought to ask what you mean by 'the last turn’?

From my viewpoint, once a platter is in motion, driven by the turntable’s motor, it’s in motion until it stops. This would make your question moot because the platter turns continuously, until it doesn’t and stops.

Do you mean ‘the last turn’ after the turntable motor is switched off? This would, at least on the AS1000 and AS2000 — and I suspect on some other turntables, be numerous ‘turns’ or rotations —unless there is a brake, as for instance on the Technics SP10 turntables.
 
Yes, but the subject in this thread seem to have a knot, I took a look at 2 YouTube videos and on both what seems to be a knot appear as the platter revolves..

It would be interesting to se a w&f plot and FFT spectrum , maybe like the Shaknspin data I posted for my own turntable, in another thread. The interaction between motor, belt/string and platter determines the speed performance. I understand that measurement are not popular or the focus in this forum, but it would be interesting to see how far vinyl playback can go technically with such a massive design at this, knot or no knot…
I would like to ask about the part of your comment that states "The interaction between motor, belt/string and platter determines the speed performance”.

Based upon my experience, I would have written The interaction between motor, belt/string and platter affects but does not exclusively determine a turntable's speed performance.

There are other factors involved in the speed performance of The Absolute Nothing turntable.

Do you agree?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA
Getting back on thread I assume the multiple shapes in the milling is to prevent dominant resonant frequencies. I think I read elsewhere that DDK likes steel almost as much as Brunel - I think he articulated its use on the basis that unlike say Panzerholz it doesn’t absorb the musical signal/energy. I am personally a huge fan of mass used correctly such as on my EMT 950 makes a system so calm
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu