Welcome, Daniel and thank you for the useful clarification. It makes sense. I'm not happy but I can perfectly understand and I'm still with you! Good luck for Munich show and the Cascade launch.
Just to clarify am I reading this correct? The price gap between the Reference and Cascade is 16K? That would mean the Reference now cost 79K? And the Select would cost $152,500. Are you adding in the cost of the DD with this price?Also, the price gap between the Reference and Select (73,500) is much bigger than between the Reference and Cascade (16,000).
Thank you for the explanation, which makes perfect sense to me. When you buy a product from any manufacturer, let's say for USD 100,000, you cannot reasonably expect that this gives you a lifelong right to be credited with USD 100,000 on all new products from the manufacturer. Purchasers of audio and other equipment must accept that there will be substantial depreciation in the value of used equipment upon trade-in. Otherwise, manufacturers would be forced to inflate the prices of new products to earn money from sales to existing customers.Hello! This is Daniel Gullman here, finally decided to make an account and jump in to share some thoughts. It pains me to see speculation for things that I have the answers behind all this… so here I am, to hopefully clear things up.
The 95,000 USD price of the Cascade DAC is a disruption to MSB and to industry trends. Here, we have a DAC outperforming the Select DAC and we made the radical decision to sell it for less. Why?
I will happily provide some full transparency on the reasoning behind the decisions made. This is a real example of how “greedy corporations” can and often work, not us. We could have arbitrarily decided to sell the Cascade DAC for 165,000. That reality would see our customers unknowingly purchase both the Cascade DAC and the value of the Reference DAC all over again. Easy for us to offer 100% trade value as long as we could still find a way to sleep at night. A cloak and daggers method to deceive people. This is genuinely what industry folks asked us to do when we first revealed the pricing… it’s a thing. I hate it.
Let’s chat about the previous trade in program, and how it was different. For the Reference to Select upgrade: we gut and re-use almost all the parts of the Reference DAC. Because this is the same platform, we can do that and make the trade in actually work. Also, the price gap between the Reference and Select (73,500) is much bigger than between the Reference and Cascade (16,000). But now, moving to the Cascade, we have fundamentally changed to next gen architecture and we cannot migrate materials over. If we limited the Cascade to the Select platform it would have killed our most innovative product evolution yet. The Cascade DAC will have 90% trade in because similarly, we can migrate the actual DAC materials over to the new Sentinel DAC.
Now, let’s address modular design… the DACs are still modular and will still benefit from this. When/if new updates or input modules come out, they will be made available to existing DACs that are already 10 years old… and that will continue moving forward. The Digital Director for the Reference and Select is an upgrade we were able to implement because of this. This is the upgrade path to the new platform! Y’all made it! This is how products are supported. We will continue to do this! We are nerds and we want everyone to get their hands on cool stuff. We can service and fix our DACs longer than anyone in our industry because of this design feature.
Alright, sorry for the long message, last thing to discuss. Why 50%? I hear you, and you are right. Do not trade in a one month old DAC! That would be wild. This trade in policy is a price protection policy. It means in 5 years, your Reference will not drop below 50% because it CAN be traded in for the Cascade. Maybe even in 8 or 10 years!? If anyone wants to sell their new Reference DAC, the buyer can know that DAC has an established value. It is worth a hell of a lot more than 50% its original value. Let’s not get carried away praising the new DAC at the cost the Reference and Select DACs. They are still. So. Damn. Good. Every owner thought it was worth the money when they bought them, and they still are.
So, in the end, why choose 95k vs 165k? This is where the buyer wins, not the “greedy corporation”. I am terribly concerned over industry behavior towards charging whatever will be paid. Systems based on retail dollar values instead of the product craftsmanship. They say the audio market is slowing down, but I feel we are simply pricing out the people we do it for. We are engineers who have created a leading class manufacturing facility with advanced robotics, lean manufacturing, and clever designs to be able to offer our best sound ever at this price point. I am not disillusioned on the price, this is still expensive, but we are going to make sure quality from start to finish is second to none.
This is as honest as I can be. I am just a guy trying to make cool audio systems because I really like building them. I am not trying to screw anyone over. We made a decision that was best for the most people possible… and I totally get how much that sucks for some of you. For that, I am sorry. We decided not to gauge you… if you tally it up, it’s a better future for you too.
Cheers all! Glad to be here.
yes he's adding, and since the cascade already comes with a DD, that is the most reasonable comparissonJust to clarify am I reading this correct? The price gap between the Reference and Cascade is 16K? That would mean the Reference now cost 79K? And the Select would cost $152,500. Are you adding in the cost of the DD with this price?
Correct, the Reference with the DD is most similar.Just to clarify am I reading this correct? The price gap between the Reference and Cascade is 16K? That would mean the Reference now cost 79K? And the Select would cost $152,500. Are you adding in the cost of the DD with this price?
I see exactly what you are saying, and I am sure it feels unfair. Again, sorry this is the case for you specifically. To clarify, this is based on idea that you "should" trade the Reference DAC in now. As stated, this 50% is price protection for the long term, not to cycle new products year by year. Selling used, people will pay much more than the retail of a New Premier DAC for a used Reference DAC if you want to move it quickly. If you keep the DAC long enough, that 50% will become much more attractive. That being said, selling on the open market will give you the best value, not a 25K loss. That used market will also be boosted that even after more time the Reference DAC has a minimum value it can hit. At some point, many years later, it can be sold as a token and used to upgrade... I am sure the next owner will be very happy to have it.@Daniel Gullman I welcome the new design and MSB pushing the boundaries. My issue is with the 50% trade up value for my Reference, it's worth basically the same as the Premier towards a Cascade. The 90% Premier trade vs the 50% Reference trade means I lose approx 25K in value. With the fast pace of digital your trade policy was the reason I chose MSB.
Thanks for the understanding Erikl. I appreciate hearing it.Thank you for the explanation, which makes perfect sense to me. When you buy a product from any manufacturer, let's say for USD 100,000, you cannot reasonably expect that this gives you a lifelong right to be credited with USD 100,000 on all new products from the manufacturer. Purchasers of audio and other equipment must accept that there will be substantial depreciation in the value of used equipment upon trade-in. Otherwise, manufacturers would be forced to inflate the prices of new products to earn money from sales to existing customers.
What advice do you have for Select owners who want the best MSB DAC available? Is it possible for us to trade in our Select DAC and director for the Cascade DAC and receive a credit of 50% of the original purchase price, and then later trade in the Cascade DAC for the Sentinel DAC when it is released? I ask this question because your new trade-in policy does not explicitly mention any trade-in options for the Select DAC towards the Cascade DAC.
You are the owner and I am the consumer. You make the rules and I have the choice to follow them. I just wish I could have known this 4 months ago that going forward my unit would be worth 50% in trade.I see exactly what you are saying, and I am sure it feels unfair. Again, sorry this is the case for you specifically. To clarify, this is based on idea that you "should" trade the Reference DAC in now. As stated, this 50% is price protection for the long term, not to cycle new products year by year. Selling used, people will pay much more than the retail of a New Premier DAC for a used Reference DAC if you want to move it quickly. If you keep the DAC long enough, that 50% will become much more attractive. That being said, selling on the open market will give you the best value, not a 25K loss. That used market will also be boosted that even after more time the Reference DAC has a minimum value it can hit. At some point, many years later, it can be sold as a token and used to upgrade... I am sure the next owner will be very happy to have it.
I hear you. It hurts if you are in a hurry to upgrade from the Reference + Director (particularly a very new set) to the Cascade. The former is already amazing in every way and nothing will diminish that, ever. I plan on enjoying mine for many years to come and some day, finances permitting, move smoothly to the Cascade in full knowledge of the changeover price. Because I use my Reference DAC as the heart of both analog and digital sources, I expect the lower noise “preamp” section of the Cascade to be of particular benefit to me.You are the owner and I am the consumer. You make the rules and I have the choice to follow them. I just wish I could have known this 4 months ago that going forward my unit would be worth 50% in trade.
No there is no rush for me to upgrade. I kept my Premier for 2 years before moving to the Reference. That was my plan as well. But knowing I now only get 50% value towards a trade isn't good. Again this was a major reason for going with MSB.I hear you. It hurts if you are in a hurry to upgrade from the Reference + Director (particularly a very new set) to the Cascade. The former is already amazing in every way and nothing will diminish that, ever. I plan on enjoying mine for many years to come and some day, finances permitting, move smoothly to the Cascade in full knowledge of the changeover price. Because I use my Reference DAC as the heart of both analog and digital sources, I expect the lower noise “preamp” section of the Cascade to be of particular benefit to me.
I applaud MSB for their pricing decision on the Cascade. The industry is in a race to the top in terms of price and it must stop. Yes? 95k USD is an eye watering sum for a non-essential consumer item in the real world. But unlike in economics, the trickle down effect here is real.
Ditto.You are the owner and I am the consumer. You make the rules and I have the choice to follow them. I just wish I could have known this 4 months ago that going forward my unit would be worth 50% in trade.
...Taiko had a similar "special intro" approach with the new Olympus and I/O products, so perhaps not so silly at all.I would suggest to MSB a special “promotional campaign” exclusively for all the Reference owners who want to purchase/upgrade a Digital Director, just for taming their actual “trade-in sadness”:
Have you? Not one time I have ever said I wasn't happy with my Reference. MSB selling the Cascade cheaper than the Select is great but has nothing to do with my issue."I hear you"
Who said I didn't do this?If I was about to spend the price of two compact cars on a single equipment, of digital hifi audio, that has over 5 years of life (maybe ten on the Select case?), on the mid of the fierce competition that ultra high end DACs have become in the last years, I would sooo surely ask whoever I can "hey, how are the plans for a next gen release?".
Not silly at all Luca. Will discuss with Jonathan. We may also have a supply of refurbished digital directors become available as well which could suit this application. Thanks, will keep you posted.I would suggest to MSB a special “promotional campaign” exclusively for all the Reference owners who want to purchase/upgrade a Digital Director, just for taming their actual “trade-in sadness”:
1. The actual price of the DD is becoming difficult to justify the upgrade after the Cascade launch
2. We can expect in the next future that lots of used DD units will be available (coming from the trade-in-upgrades to Cascade). It should imply many “reconditioned” DD units soon in house
3. It could offer to all Reference owners the opportunity to still upgrade their DACs and elevate the performance of their systems at a lesser price
4. It could reduce the gap in performance/architecture between old (Reference) and new (Cascade) generation DACs
5. It should reinforce the loyalty of customers that actually seems to be compromised/penalized by the new trade-in policy (nevertheless what Daniel has transparently clarified makes perfectly sense)
6. It could keep alive a market segment of MSB products otherwise pretty dead (out of production) after the new gen launch
7. It could save, as a consequence, the value of used Reference DACs on the market.
8. It could permit the opportunity to gain new customers due to a “more affordable” solution
Sorry if it is a silly idea! Just my honest contribution to the debate.