The irony of it all: you have turned the drive of the turntable into a more obvious digital system and therefore as you say on a “nano scale” the data acquisition into a digital system, away from the continuous analog retrieval process. In the old days you would call doing this “dumb it down”. I guess this one slipped by you. So the take away is that in the Esoteric Grandioso T1 turntable system, digital gets “each track moved away from reproduced music toward realism, every track had more inner energy mostly more micro-dynamics, big music was bigger. the ambience and space was more real and defined. spookily so on many cuts. i heard venue info i have never heard before. the sense of musical intent was much stronger, the sense of the players playing together more evident.” Than analog.
I guess that I’m the only one that noticed this great irony? Sorry but it needed to be pointed out. Why didn’t the “Industry Experts” render this point and bring it to the surface? I wonder why!
For the ones pondering this, take a look at the magnetic induction drive system:
View attachment 107254
Discrete torque impulses, a digital drive system before the external clock is even added.
It must be much better in Mike’s ears to brushless DC motors. Time for others to build turntables with stepper-motors, with digital clock inputs, as I’m sure this new class will evolve: belt-drive, direct-drive, rim-drive, and now digital-drive.