It's no secret that lower noise and jitter only has upside and no downside. Well I guess there is a downside, higher cost. But not by much. My experience with clock upgrades so far is the difference is so profound, it's noticeable immediately. You would especially notice right away with the GG as the Amanero uses much higher jitter clocks than most DAC's use that cost over $2000. The Amanero reclocker board was created for a reason.
If someone wanted an easier option that's much better than stock Amanero, and only costs $160, Amanero licences the product to a third party who makes the boards with Crystek 957 series clocks on them, improved voltage regs etc. Huge upgrade.
(...)
Here it is with the standard Amanero clocks. but you can see the pads are big so several clocks can be fitted on the board.
http://www.shenzhenaudio.com/amaner...ade-verion-usb-module-for-l-k-s-mh-da003.html
Crystek 957's:
(...)
Here's an impression one guy had upgrading the stock amanero to this unit on his DAC:
"
Sound impressions:
-Widens the already big soundstage of the MH-DA003, bringing a greater sense of breadth and depth.
-The wooly low-bass has been cleaned up, it is a lot more solid and defined, on the LCD-3F, the apparent weight of the bass is both heard and felt, there is an obvious visceral impact.
-This change is one step closer to the elimination of the ES9018 tizzy top end, with the new USB interface, the rendering of the clash of cymbals is clear with all the transients intact, without being overly bright.
-Overall more analog sounding, much of the digital etch and glare is gone."
You are just repeating your arguments in a circular way, avoiding my main argument - it is your unknown and non described experience and that of unknown DIY people.
IMHO you are using the jitter argument as a miraculous cure, exactly the same way some people use the argument of minimizing distortion or noise.
My point is that results you obtained in other equipment in non reported conditions are not forcefully transposed to all other similar equipment. The people from Lampizator are not ordinary DIY moders. They have large experience with the product, they had the opportunity to listen to it in many SOTA systems around the world, and a known background. Until we have their opinion I think there is no reason to carry a change that invalidates warranties and involves soldering.
If your advice was just a simple swap reversible in ten seconds, such as a tube swap, that can be done and reverted how long I we wish, I would not be so conservative - I also enjoy tuning.
We had a similar affair in the SoundLab forum years ago concerning the back plates. A few DIY modifiers started modifying the standard crossovers, optimizing it to their specif systems. Although the modification had some good consequences, it also had a few problems with some amplifiers - they could result in abundant smoke emission in some cases!
![Big Grin :D :D]()
Roger West, the Soundlab onwer and designer, tested the mods, become aware of what could be improved in his own design, and later incorporated the results of this research in a new development - the Tooroid II. Surely I was one the first people to ask for it, as soon as it got the official approval seal.
I hope that soon we will have the opinion of Lampizator people on these matters. Perhaps they will agree with you and offer an option similar to your advice, who knows?