How observant are you?

I thought most audio/videophiles had a little bit of OCD...
That would invalidate the test, wouldn't it? Because if you are the OCD type, you would Google every question before answering -- precisely what those cheating Canadians have done in this thread!!! :D

Me, I thought I had to get back to the forum and post away so I clicked if I didn't know the answer in the first millisecond. Being an engineer, I had a millisecond timer next to me and helping me get through the entire test in less than a second!
 
well...with the test indicating national average is 7...i suppose the average score here somewhere in the high teens would indicate maybe we are more observant or 'ocd' as Bruce suggests. Further, i would add if they had asked ridiculous questions about treble, detail retrieval, decay, bass slam...we would have all ended up scoring in the 23 mark...and the national average would have been 1! ;)
 
Further, i would add if they had asked ridiculous questions about treble, detail retrieval, decay, bass slam...we would have all ended up scoring in the 23 mark...and the national average would have been 1! ;)

That's it!! It's a biased test with skewed results that didn't reach the targeted audience!
 
Now that enough people have taken it, it asked what is the first number on FM dial. I said 87, it said 88 was true. This is wrong. FM frequencies start at 87.5. To wit, on my FM radio app on my Droid, it also starts with 87.5. Maybe old fashioned dial radios have 88 written on them. I don't know. I am a digital guy and an engineer, so details matter to me! OK, maybe not after missing all the other questions I answered quickly out of the need to not waste time!!! :D
I think this is a rounding vs. truncation issue!! ...:D

Frank
 
Well if the average is "7", then I could probably tell you the demographic that the results were pulled from... but that is profiling and profiling is wrong!!:rolleyes:
 
I wonder how Gov. Perry and Herman Cain would do?
 
Now that enough people have taken it, it asked what is the first number on FM dial. I said 87, it said 88 was true. This is wrong. FM frequencies start at 87.5. To wit, on my FM radio app on my Droid, it also starts with 87.5. Maybe old fashioned dial radios have 88 written on them. I don't know. I am a digital guy and an engineer, so details matter to me! OK, maybe not after missing all the other questions I answered quickly out of the need to not waste time!!! :D

They asked for a full even digit, and 87.5 is not 87

Then the first full digit (without decimal) is 88
 
I got 25 out of 25.


Yes, I'm lying. Made you feel bad anyway, didn't it!
 
16

Campbell soup? Good grief!
 
I also put 87...

Helps to still listen to an analog Tuner.

3026695851_3a7eddd01c.jpg
 
I had Bruce Campbell in here doing a VO for a video game a couple years ago!
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu