I am slowly inching past the 40hr mark with the Etna SL. Time for an update. In one word, it's FLAWLES. ( Pl add usual disclaimers about my system, my room, musical priorities and wax filled ears!). I am unable to find any fault with the Etna SL. It's neutral as neutral can be. Silky gossamer highs, pulsating and tuneful bass , supple yet enticing midrange. It simply lets the music through without imposing its own authorithy.
How does the Etna compare with the Etna SL ? Tough call as the operating parameters are different. I am getting way superior results with the Etna SL over the Etna. Between the Etna and the Atlas on the same TT, I preferred the Etna by a whisker. Between the Etna SL and the Atlas, again comparisons based on same TT with 2 Durand arms, the Etna SL is, IMHO the preferred cart and by a long margin.
I suspect it's the Etna SL and Lyra Erodion combo that responsible for the results I am getting and I still have some way to go for breakin.
The Madake has been neglected as the Etna SL has hogged playtime. It's a beautiful cart. Neutral - Wot dat ? It's voluptuous , enticing and I can't imagine 2 carts being more dissimilar
Hopefully, the 3rd cart should arrive soon as I hope to trade in the A95 for its elder sibling.
NJoy
Pradeep
Hi Pradeep,
I agree with your assessment of the Etna SL. It's a superb cartridge and does outperform the Lyra Atlas (which I still have). I am not so sure it has that much to do with the phono stage but rather the cartridge itself. I am using the true dual mono CH Precision P1 and I get the same results as you are hearing.
Congrats on a superb cartridge.