Magico introduced the Q series subwoofers

What we have here is another case of Magico Derangement Syndrome. At first, it was just the media elites that suffered from this. Valin virtually destroyed the reputation of TAS with his Magico cheer leading, and now Harley is finishing the burial... But what is unbelievable is how many members on this site, who pride themselves on being rational, have caught the latest strain of Magico derangement syndrome. So let's get a hold of the lizard brain before things totally spin out of control and use our cerebral cortex to assess the situation. Do you think that a testorone addled Magico owner will listen to your whining of why Magico subwoofer is expensive or how you can do better with a cheaper subwoofer? I hate to burst your bubble, but Magico is trying to be an audio-lifestyle brand, akin to Ralph Lauren. If a guy is buying a top of the line Ralph Lauren suit for work and some Lauren shirts for casual days at a luxury haberdasher, is he going to stop by Walmart on the way home to buy some socks and underwear?

Yes, Magico does things by measurements and as a result has an analytic sound. Many Magico owners add a warm, euphonic amp to kill some of the analytic sound. regardless, this Magico sound happens to appeal to many, just like a super premium pistachio gelato appeals to a guy who already likes pistachio gelato. Life is a bitch. If someone finds value in an expensive Magico rack or a Magico subwoofer, God bless them that they found something that allows them to enjoy life. If it's expensive and they love it, there is no reason to be jealous.

No one wants to pay a high price, unless there is something worthwhile to pay for. The key is finding out if there is true value in those Magico products. But with Magico's hand selected reviewers, will we ever find out if Magico products add true value? Unfortunately not.
 
1) Only so far as it relates to the speaker or driver it has to blend with. It's relative, not absolute.

2) Only when a design is compromised to meet a physical size restriction or the motor (magnet/coil/spider) is not appropriately matched to the cone size and box volume.

When you use the term "relative", are you saying that each type of speaker, in an ideal state, could have a custom sub-woofer, just like Magico is doing?
 
What we have here is another case of Magico Derangement Syndrome. At first, it was just the media elites that suffered from this. Valin virtually destroyed the reputation of TAS with his Magico cheer leading, and now Harley is finishing the burial... But what is unbelievable is how many members on this site, who pride themselves on being rational, have caught the latest strain of Magico derangement syndrome. So let's get a hold of the lizard brain before things totally spin out of control and use our cerebral cortex to assess the situation. Do you think that a testorone addled Magico owner will listen to your whining of why Magico subwoofer is expensive or how you can do better with a cheaper subwoofer? I hate to burst your bubble, but Magico is trying to be an audio-lifestyle brand, akin to Ralph Lauren. If a guy is buying a top of the line Ralph Lauren suit for work and some Lauren shirts for casual days at a luxury haberdasher, is he going to stop by Walmart on the way home to buy some socks and underwear?

Yes, Magico does things by measurements and as a result has an analytic sound. Many Magico owners add a warm, euphonic amp to kill some of the analytic sound. regardless, this Magico sound happens to appeal to many, just like a super premium pistachio gelato appeals to a guy who already likes pistachio gelato. Life is a bitch. If someone finds value in an expensive Magico rack or a Magico subwoofer, God bless them that they found something that allows them to enjoy life. If it's expensive and they love it, there is no reason to be jealous.

No one wants to pay a high price, unless there is something worthwhile to pay for. The key is finding out if there is true value in those Magico products. But with Magico's hand selected reviewers, will we ever find out if Magico products add true value? Unfortunately not.

1) You have been systematically trying to trash Magico. Are you frustrated you cannot afford a pair or do you have a hidden agenda? why do you bother at all posting on the Magico forum if you don't like how their speakers sound? There are a lot of well known speaker brands I don't like, I just stay away from their forum
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews? The only way to discover if a product is worthwhile to pay for is to listen to it. Reviews are there to indicate that something is worth listening, nothing more
3) if it would be so easy to "buy reviewers", why much bigger and richer companies such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, B&W are not praised as the absolute reference?
4) "Magico hand's selected reviewers": do you realize that there is a world beyond TAS and US? have you ever heard about top German magazines such as Stereoplay (in their ranking, there are 3 Magico speakers in the top 4 spots)? Have you ever heard about Stereo Sound, the reference magazine in Japan? Not a single company has earned more Grand Prix over the past 10 years, across all categories of hifi equipments...

PS: Magico speakers have no sound by themselves. They sound like the source you use because unlike 99% of speakers out there, they don't add anything to the signal. It is stupid to say they sound analytical. They just sound like the source you use with them.
 
... Magico is trying to be an audio-lifestyle brand, akin to Ralph Lauren.
If a guy is buying a top of the line Ralph Lauren suit for work and some Lauren shirts for casual days at a luxury haberdasher, is he going to stop by Walmart on the way home to buy some socks and underwear?

...

Perhaps he should; they are as comfortable than at that other more exclusive/expensive designer-named fashionable store.
And they're probably also made in China or India using the same amount of bad-chemicals-for-your-skin that goes into their fabrication (coloring).

...
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews?
...

Yes, some people indeed do. ...The more expensive the less they'll actually listen to them, before. ...It is a true reality. ...And some won't even read reviews. ...On top of never listening to them. ...Only at home, after purchasing them, if they have the time.
They are not stupid, they are rich and cannot afford to waste their time. ...Only money (for us it's wasted money, but not for them; they have been told they got the best).
 
Last edited:
1) You have been systematically trying to trash Magico. Are you frustrated you cannot afford a pair or do you have a hidden agenda? why do you bother at all posting on the Magico forum if you don't like how their speakers sound? There are a lot of well known speaker brands I don't like, I just stay away from their forum
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews? The only way to discover if a product is worthwhile to pay for is to listen to it. Reviews are there to indicate that something is worth listening, nothing more
3) if it would be so easy to "buy reviewers", why much bigger and richer companies such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, B&W are not praised as the absolute reference?
4) "Magico hand's selected reviewers": do you realize that there is a world beyond TAS and US? have you ever heard about top German magazines such as Stereoplay (in their ranking, there are 3 Magico speakers in the top 4 spots)? Have you ever heard about Stereo Sound, the reference magazine in Japan? Not a single company has earned more Grand Prix over the past 10 years, across all categories of hifi equipments...

PS: Magico speakers have no sound by themselves. They sound like the source you use because unlike 99% of speakers out there, they don't add anything to the signal. It is stupid to say they sound analytical. They just sound like the source you use with them.


+1, great post.
 
1) You have been systematically trying to trash Magico. Are you frustrated you cannot afford a pair or do you have a hidden agenda? why do you bother at all posting on the Magico forum if you don't like how their speakers sound? There are a lot of well known speaker brands I don't like, I just stay away from their forum
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews? The only way to discover if a product is worthwhile to pay for is to listen to it. Reviews are there to indicate that something is worth listening, nothing more
3) if it would be so easy to "buy reviewers", why much bigger and richer companies such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, B&W are not praised as the absolute reference?
4) "Magico hand's selected reviewers": do you realize that there is a world beyond TAS and US? have you ever heard about top German magazines such as Stereoplay (in their ranking, there are 3 Magico speakers in the top 4 spots)? Have you ever heard about Stereo Sound, the reference magazine in Japan? Not a single company has earned more Grand Prix over the past 10 years, across all categories of hifi equipments...

PS: Magico speakers have no sound by themselves. They sound like the source you use because unlike 99% of speakers out there, they don't add anything to the signal. It is stupid to say they sound analytical. They just sound like the source you use with them.

+2

PS. I'm probably deaf. My listening room graced Wilson Sasha, Wilson Sophia II, Avalon Eidolon Vision, Quad 2805, Audiostatic, Magnepan 3.6 and other highly regarded speakers. Not to mention countless of speakers I've heard during the shows on 3 continents in the past 20 years. Now I own the Magico S5, simply because ... it is the best speaker I have heard in its class. I've heard them and bought them on the spot. So I must be deaf. Or maybe I'm under influence of those reviews ...
 
1) You have been systematically trying to trash Magico. Are you frustrated you cannot afford a pair or do you have a hidden agenda? why do you bother at all posting on the Magico forum if you don't like how their speakers sound? There are a lot of well known speaker brands I don't like, I just stay away from their forum
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews? The only way to discover if a product is worthwhile to pay for is to listen to it. Reviews are there to indicate that something is worth listening, nothing more
3) if it would be so easy to "buy reviewers", why much bigger and richer companies such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, B&W are not praised as the absolute reference?
4) "Magico hand's selected reviewers": do you realize that there is a world beyond TAS and US? have you ever heard about top German magazines such as Stereoplay (in their ranking, there are 3 Magico speakers in the top 4 spots)? Have you ever heard about Stereo Sound, the reference magazine in Japan? Not a single company has earned more Grand Prix over the past 10 years, across all categories of hifi equipments...

PS: Magico speakers have no sound by themselves. They sound like the source you use because unlike 99% of speakers out there, they don't add anything to the signal. It is stupid to say they sound analytical. They just sound like the source you use with them.

@stereo. I will sidestep the frustration for not being able to afford the speakers. It is not warranted IMO... This out of the way. I agree with you and am also annoyed by Caesar constant trashing of Magico (and other brands too to be fair).

@Caesar Stating you, don't like the speaker is OK. Those constant insinuations about them (Magico) bribing/buying/influencing in your worldview part of a large conspiracy against I am not sure what, maybe your preferred brand of speakers (Wilson? Others?) are at least annoying. The consistency and stridency of such is wearing. Let's stop the constant putdown. it doesn't elevate the debate or make any point.

@everyone. Having heard now 4 Magico speakers (Mini, Q3, Q5 aand Q7) I can honestly say they are among the best speakers I have heard to date. I have not have heard every speakers around of course not. In the here and now at the top of my lists the Q7 and Q5 and that regardless of price and pedigree. That of course , IMHO, YMMV, etc

A for the Magico subwoofers. I am voicing again my serious reservations. Not because they couldn't be good, simply such expense is not warranted for subs. There are several commercial subs out there that can foot this bill that is go down low and if distortion an output are an issue, one can use more LF sources aka subwoofers and get in the process a much more linear low end in one's listening space. Fact not opinion. Integration of susb with mains is not easy. Audiophiles should be warned (or should have known) that great sound is not plug and play. It is (usually) a lot of work. If a person doesn't have the knowledge or the inclination to for the price of a pair of subs, one can purchase other equally high performing but less expensive subs and have serious acousticians or professionals , several on this very board, work with them to bring their system to the next level. A route less traveled but the better systems I have heard have taken it.
 
+2

PS. I'm probably deaf. My listening room graced Wilson Sasha, Wilson Sophia II, Avalon Eidolon Vision, Quad 2805, Audiostatic, Magnepan 3.6 and other highly regarded speakers. Not to mention countless of speakers I've heard during the shows on 3 continents in the past 20 years. Now I own the Magico S5, simply because ... it is the best speaker I have heard in its class. I've heard them and bought them on the spot. So I must be deaf. Or maybe I'm under influence of those reviews ...

Count me as another "deaf" Magico owner that's annoyed by caesar's need for attention.


alexandre
 
I think that the ONLY way a manufacturer would likely know that he has overpriced his product is IF no one shows up at opening day. Since this is clearly NOT happening with Magico products, AW, is IMO, appropriately asking the prices that he does. One of the issues that I think many of us have with the pricing of a lot of high-end gear, is that it seems NOT to be of good value or in any other way justifiable price-wise to us. ( Caesar--;) ). However, just because this is the case with our individual thinking, does NOT necessarily make it so to others. Recognizing this is certainly going to be beneficial to understanding the "economy" of the current high-end pricing structure. All, IMHO.
 
1) You have been systematically trying to trash Magico. Are you frustrated you cannot afford a pair or do you have a hidden agenda? why do you bother at all posting on the Magico forum if you don't like how their speakers sound? There are a lot of well known speaker brands I don't like, I just stay away from their forum
2) Do you really believe people are stupid enough to buy a product JUST because it has good reviews? The only way to discover if a product is worthwhile to pay for is to listen to it. Reviews are there to indicate that something is worth listening, nothing more
3) if it would be so easy to "buy reviewers", why much bigger and richer companies such as Wilson, Focal, Sonus Faber, B&W are not praised as the absolute reference?
4) "Magico hand's selected reviewers": do you realize that there is a world beyond TAS and US? have you ever heard about top German magazines such as Stereoplay (in their ranking, there are 3 Magico speakers in the top 4 spots)? Have you ever heard about Stereo Sound, the reference magazine in Japan? Not a single company has earned more Grand Prix over the past 10 years, across all categories of hifi equipments...

PS: Magico speakers have no sound by themselves. They sound like the source you use because unlike 99% of speakers out there, they don't add anything to the signal. It is stupid to say they sound analytical. They just sound like the source you use with them.

Dude, you are kidding right? Your comments are hilarious. Everyone has got their fetishes. Most like a real woman, not a doll, others prefer something else… Juuuuuuuuuuuust kidding!!!! :):) I'm a firebrand, a critic, and an industry observer. I love this hobby and say things very that happen to be the truth that few people dare to say. I have no ambition of being the site president and I especially love to razz magico fans because there are living in a different reality, hence I call it Magico Derangement Syndrome.

Kidding aside, i know no one likes to have their baby called butt ugly. Yes, I know feelings get hurt, but why didn’t any Magico fans complain when Valin was trashing Magico’s competitors like Scaena in his reviews and Nola when they introduced their new speaker at a show? So just a little payback!!!

You guys can call me names and personally attack me, but I prefer to discuss experiences and ideas…which is the purpose of this site. This is a discussion forum where we discuss experiences and impressions. This is not a magico fan site. If you guys want one, I recommend you start one. It would be a great boon to the magico brand that u seem to love unconditionally. Martin Logan is one if the most valuable brands in the industry, perked up by their fan site. If you start one, I promise I won't join. You, Harley, the bald dude who looks like alon wolfs brother, the nice but awkward goateed dude from magico shows, and all the guys can have a big love fest all by yourselves.

Now let’s address some of your ideas:

“Magico has No sound of their own!” And you claim people don't believe the reviewers and marketing hype? This is hilarious! Even wolf would be ashamed to say this. Even Harley wouldn't dare to say this. Why isn't everyone using metal enclosures, btw? Many small companies without the gravitas may not be able to afford aluminum, but Sony’s and Pioneers are billion dollar companies and if they believed metal is best, they would use it. so would Wilson and mbl, focal, and the other big boys. Smaller companies can just outsource this and pass the costs on to the customer. Reality is: metal just rings differently, and the magico lackeys and dealers have propagated this myth. Run what I’m saying by others with knowledge who have no skin in the game, and they will confirm what I'm saying.

Now back to the sound. So you don't agree with me they are analytic. I’m not the only that thinks so. Check out Fremer:. How to draw the line between, resolution, transparency and musicality when building the system?
Rather than drawing a line, find a good balance. High resolution without "musicality" gives you an analytical sound that's at first exciting and then you stop listening. Fetishing over "musicality" (whatever that means but let's assume like pornography, we know it when we hear it) usually gives you soft, soggy, overly romantic and warm sound that bears little resemblance to live music. Transparency is always good but only in the context of a good balance of the other elements. For example, if you like the fast, transparent, analytical sound of a Soulution amp, try to balance it with a somewhat warm and forgiving speaker. If you go for one that's more analytical, say, like a Magico Q5, which is a great speaker, but on the analytical side IMO. So putting together those two products will probably not give you a good balance of transparency, resolution and musicality....
(Find the full interview here: http://www.monoandstereo.com/2013/06/exclusive-interview-with-michael-fremer.html)
He's basically saying huge same thing I said in a previous post: " run magico speakers with warm amps!" and now that valin has new references, he has called the q7 a euphonic, colored speaker ("as you like it", using his lingo) compared to the q5 he almost bought.

Now about hand –picking reviewers: when was the last time Stereophile reviewed a magico ? Not since Fremer said the speaker had weak bass. I do a lot of work with entrepreneurs, and the #1 key most valuable marketing tactic a start-up can get is constant word of mouth that brings constant attention to the brand. That's what Valin did for the brand, and at the time he was considered one of the most gifted audio writers of his generation. No other marketing tactic is even close to what valin was able to accomplish for magico. And you think the Mahico stage guys will properly evaluate this sub? They will pop in some cheap sub and say something like: the “KMX” sub is a Great product. It makes great bass. It’s a steal at its price. But the magico product simply blew it away. And at 5 times the price, it should! " And why would the reviewers who have a close relationship with Magico criticize magico in any way? By acting like Magico’s PR guys they can stay at the front of the line when new products come out. And via the buzz Magico generates they get eyeballs on their sites, which they can show to their advertisers... and magico draws flies like nothing else. If those guys actually critically evaluate a Magico, on the other hand, like fremer did, they will not see a magico speaker, rack, or a subwoofer. But fremer's ability to speak his mind and truth that people already know about magico and the likes of mark levinson amps is what makes his reputation virtually unequal I this hobby.



I realize this post won't register with you, but this outsider perspective may give someone who has heard the buzz and is researching Magicos another perspective. I do agree that most people will listen for themselves, but at least they will have a different data point that's different from the propaganda they get everywhere else.

Coming back to valin, the man who made magico into what it is today, he now has Raidho speakers as his reference. He calls the raidho the most realistic speaker he has ever heard. He goes on to say that "ruler flat may look good on Paper, but doesn't sound right in the listening room." Valin is obviously recovering from his episode of Magico Derangement Syndrome. Amen!

And remember, just because you happen to like pistachio gelato, not everyone else does!
 
I think that the ONLY way a manufacturer would likely know that he has overpriced his product is IF no one shows up at opening day. Since this is clearly NOT happening with Magico products, AW, is IMO, appropriately asking the prices that he does. One of the issues that I think many of us have with the pricing of a lot of high-end gear, is that it seems NOT to be of good value or in any other way justifiable price-wise to us. ( Caesar--;) ). However, just because this is the case with our individual thinking, does NOT necessarily make it so to others. Recognizing this is certainly going to be beneficial to understanding the "economy" of the current high-end pricing structure. All, IMHO.

Davey, I think you got me all wrong. I am pretty libertarian about high end audio prices. If people can afford them and find the value, let Magico charge them, make a ton of money, invest in R&D, and hopefully come up with a less analytic sounding product!:)

As far as the sub-woofer pricing, I think it may hurt the cable manufacturers a tiny bit. It will push the upgrade cycle out a bit, as people will probably spend that $30K+ on the sub-woofer before the cable....
 
And remember, just because you happen to like pistachio gelato, not everyone else does!

Agreed. So perhaps you shouldn't go around telling people who LIKE pistachio gelato are deranged...


alexandre
 
I happen to find construction wise , the Q series to be one of the most heroic Ls efforts on the market ,with the Q 7 matching with overal sound quality.
There is design /R and D shippingcost importer/dealer mark ups, i think ceasars comments are a bit shortsighted
 
Stereophile ::

* Magico Q5: $65,000/pair => Class A (Restricted Extreme LF); needs a good subwoofer for that last octave of bass to compete with the big boys (with Full-Range speakers).
- Michael Fremer: "It lacked some bottom-end weight and drive, which keeps this speaker from being rated Class A (Full-Range)."
- (Vol.33 No.11 WWW)

* Magico V3: $27,000/pair => Class A (Restricted Extreme LF); needs a good subwoofer for completists (Full-Range).
- John Atkinson: "The Magico will never be a speaker for low-bass addicts, ...its overall presentation was somewhat on the polite side, ...the Magico was fussy about amplification and room placement." - (Vol.31 No.5 WWW)

________________

Now Magico has two new subs to complete their systems at that newer/higher elevated plateau of the full-range category.
Forget the money; you can get the Class A (Full-Range speakers) for less than $15,000/pair, and without the need of a subwoofer (B&W 800 Diamond, Nola Alon Circe, Revel Ultima Studio & Studio2, plus the ones that weren't reviewed). And add another $5,000 to this, for up to $20,000/pair and you have even more choice in that top category (Class A- Full-Range) where the Magicos are not even part of (B&W Signature 800, Dynaudio Confidence C4, Innersound Kaya, KEF Reference 207/2, Revel Ultima Salon2, Sonus Faber Cremona Elipsa, and all the ones not reviewed).

The Magico Q5s, with their matching subwoofer will stretch this to just over $100,000 (five to seven times more than from the above top-gun models).
=> $65,000 + $36,000 = $101,000

And the Magico V3, with its matching sub; just under $50,000 (roughly three times more, still).
=> $27,000 + $22,000 = $49,000
 
ceasar you said ;

“Magico has No sound of their own!” And you claim people don't believe the reviewers and marketing hype? This is hilarious! Even wolf would be ashamed to say this. Even Harley wouldn't dare to say this. Why isn't everyone using metal enclosures, btw? Many small companies without the gravitas may not be able to afford aluminum, but Sony’s and Pioneers are billion dollar companies and if they believed metal is best, they would use it. so would Wilson and mbl, focal, and the other big boys


High end audio is not a big market ,they[sony,pioneer] rather sell 100 million 200$ dvd players a year then 10000 1500 $ ones .
aluminium is great stuff to make a Ls from , its not the only way though
 
to Caesar:
1) feel free to like whatever you want- pistachio doesn’t have to be your flavor. But there is a fine line between saying that you don’t like something and attacking all Magico customers as a bunch of idiots with too much money in their pockets buying products just because they read a good review in TAS.

2) Since most of your posts are to criticize Magico and a few other brands, maybe it would be helpful for us to understand what you use in your system, and what you like? What was your audio journey? what equipment did you try in your system? Seems sometimes that your experience is mainly from reading magazines…

3) You really seem obsessed with the TAS and Stereophile gang: Valin, Fremer… You describe yourself as an “industry observer”, I hope for you that your source of knowledge is a bit broader than that. So, according to you Valin is a crook who doesn’t speak his mind and Fremer is a semi-God who always says the truth?? I am a subscriber for both and find that TAS is testing more interesting products… but not sure when is the last time I read a review in any of them saying a product is plain bad! 20 years ago?
Wake up! Why do you believe that Stereophile is not praising Magico like TAS? For the simple reason that TAS were the first one to discover the company. Stereophile cannot just copy TAS and advertise their main competitor’s baby. Do you SERIOUSLY believe Magico wouldn’t like to have the Q7 being reviewed by Stereophile? And why do you believe that Valin is now pushing Raidho? Because he couldn’t get the Q7 in his room, and he needs to bring novelty, this is what sells papers.
If you want to have somebody who speak his mind, rather read Jeff Fritz’s reviews and his answers to consumers letters, he doesn’t hesitate to write it when a product is not worth the money. Or read German magazines. They don’t hesitate to criticize products, and give a quantitative assessment. Or just do like me: go to listen by yourself, your own ears is the only thing which really matters…

4) Why are most big companies using MDF instead of aluminum? Because of cost!!! Machining and assembling a speaker cabinet like the Q cost 10 to 20 times more than any MDF speaker. But it gives excellent benefits in term of lack of resonance, when properly dampened (that's why Magico uses Black hole 5 for dampening, it is much more expensive than regular foam, but works much better). Go to knock on a Q7 and on a Focal Grand Utopia. Sounds&Color in Paris happens to have both. Doing the test (and listening to both in same room) is very instructive: you cannot honestly state that Magico aluminum cabinet rings. Just do the test by yourself.
Your comment on Sony and Pioneer shows you don't understand much on Consumer electronics industry (which happens to be the field I am working in)... Big CE players are designing a product to a price point: their objective is to sell millions of units at a targeted (low) price point, they will make all performance trade off necessary to reach target cost. They have zero interest to real high end audio (why bothering about a market where leaders such as Wilson make less than 10mio of revenue and where NOBODY is making any decent money??). Magico designs to a performance point, not a price point. Different consumer target, different retailers and different retail margin- which is probably the biggest factor why high end hi-fi is so expensive: when you buy a product for 100 at an audio dealer, 50+ goes in the pocket of the dealer... and much more than that for cables.

5) your full paragraph on what makes a good sound is an oxymoron- or are you claiming that a speaker should add distortion to become musical? What you describe as warmth is distortion. The philosophy of Magico design is pretty simple, and I fully adhere to it: “the more transparent the speaker is, the more musical it is”. I had tons of different speakers in the past (Infinity IRS, Wilson WP, Triangle, Usher BE20, APL, EA MM3….). None of them is as transparent as the Magico Q serie AND as musical. By far. This is coming from the use of better driver, better XO components, better wiring and better cabinet design. Unfortunately better means here significantly higher cost- there is no marketing voodoo, just science.

6) If you could visit my room in Taiwan I would demo you why I think that “Magico speakers don’t have a sound”. They are neutral, and transparent. You may not like this neutrality but that is a different topic. I can make my Q1 sound warm and euphonic if connected to a tube amp. I can make it dry and hyper-analytical when connected to a Spectral amp. You can connect it to a Vitus or a Dartzeel and it becomes both warm and high resolving at the same time. Just pick what you like! Because of their transparency to the source, Magic speakers are therefore probably the most sensitive speakers to changes of upstream components. It is not that they are difficult to match, it is more that they let you hear how your upstream components really sound, whereas most other speakers' distortion is much higher than upstream components' distortion, so that they mask the sound of the source.

=> if you don’t value transparency and if you don’t believe that transparency and impulse response of a speaker is the most important factor for musicality, then move on, Magico would be a very bad value for money for you: why spending a fortune on reducing distortion with sophisticated cabinet design, custom drivers and high end Mundorf XO components? Distortion is cheap- good news for you!
PS: I am not “dude”
 
Last edited:
While i agree with most of what stereo says i think focal /jm lab would be a wrong example ,as they are probaly [one of] the biggest player with also affordable speakerlines and car audiolines , wilson is uing their bassunits /titanium domes.
It would be easy for them make a alu one if they saw the benefit , i dont know from what the grande utopias front/housing is made of these days i doubt very much its only mdf
 
Last edited:
Interesting thread. Haven't heard Magicos and probably won't. Given what I have heard, and Magicos design goals, I can't imagine they're worth the prices, but I'm not buying, so my vote doesn't count. But the language of the debate makes it nearly useless. What is analytical vs musical? A lot of experience on audiophile forums gives us the vague idea that musical is somewhere between neutral (for a soeaker, so relatively) and fat in the mids and bass. Analytical is somewhere between neutral (same qualifiers) and exaggerated trebles, upper mids.

But there is a huge range in there you could drive a truck through, and one man's neutral coud be another's gooey mess. Has Sean olive measured these things? May not have published it, bu t I'll bet he has, to compare them to Salons. Has anyone else thoroughly measured them? Start with some numbers and you could have a meaningful conversation instead of a musical/analytical grudge match. If their FR is flat , for a speaker, n an an anechoic room, and it stays pretty linear and changes slowly and smoothly as you move off axis, then relatively speaking, they are neutral, and then we'll know what analytical really means -- a distaste for the sound of your recordings, driven to the point of wanting cover them up with coloration. Nothing wrong with that, but let's call sunglasses sunglasses, not pretend they are more better visualcal than the clear light day.

Tim
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing