The type of driver does not affect the objectives achieved (and detriments) with an attached horn.Avantgarde speakers do not use a compression driver. It is a textile dome at the end of a horn.
The type of driver does not affect the objectives achieved (and detriments) with an attached horn.Avantgarde speakers do not use a compression driver. It is a textile dome at the end of a horn.
I agree with this statement. There are examples of good and bad implementation of all of the various speaker technologies. I was simply correcting the statement regarding compression drivers as it is misinformation.The type of driver does not affect the objectives achieved (and detriments) with an attached horn.
They must have changed then in the latest generation…I know older Trios had a Beyma compression driver for the tweeter.Here is a picture of the tweeter. As all can see it is a fabric dome. The horn screws into the threads resulting in a dome tweeter firing directly into the throat of the horn.
View attachment 139834
I think you may need to update your Profile as there's no sign of a Kii!There’s no costly amp with Kii3 (or Dutch and Dutch which I haven’t heard).
Yes, there is DSP processing in the Kii3, but, there is also no other crossover component in the chain and the amps are directly coupled to each driver. I’ve owned a lot of speakers and they’ve got excellent sonics compared to other all-passives at similar (+/-50%) price points. (That being said, I appreciate both the Avantgarde and Dieses speakers I’ve heard.)
More important for this particular thread, they are exceedingly room-placement friendly, which is why I bought them in the first place given they were for a space where there was asymmetry in they Left/right corner loading and they had to be close to the rear wall.
Just checked, the previous XD version still used a Mylar diaphragm compression driver. I think this was basically the Beyma Cp-380m, which is an excellent driver.Here is a picture of the tweeter. As all can see it is a fabric dome. The horn screws into the threads resulting in a dome tweeter firing directly into the throat of the horn.
View attachment 139834
No. It sounded disappointing.Check out the Destination Audio Nika Speakers! They come highly recommended and delivered outstanding sound quality at the Munich event.
Agreed…not to say it’s not good, but it didn’t sing in Munich, IMO.No. It sounded disappointing.
They will sound completely unlike Wilsons, though.With adequate diffusion behind them, they'd likely sound exceptional.
Now I am confused, The Audio Best review says the G3 tweeter is annular, not a dome. An annular tweeter is usually a compression driver, this is what JB, BMS and some others started making as they avoid breakup issues that most compression diaphragms suffer.Here is a picture of the tweeter. As all can see it is a fabric dome. The horn screws into the threads resulting in a dome tweeter firing directly into the throat of the horn.
View attachment 139834
What’s nice about the smaller Stenheims are the front ports for a room like this.I recommend your Wilson over those AG unos or duos. So might as well stick to them, and replace them with a used Verity Leonore that will let you enjoy powerful SETs like Lamm or Kronzilla or NAT or Trafomatic. Or go Stenheim with the CH
Until before G3 the AG Trio used a custom Community M200 for mid (2 inch compression driver for 600hz-4khz) with the Beyma CP380M as a tweeter (1 inch compression driver for 4khz+) and Duo an Uno models used cone driver for mid (modified Davis cone driver) with Beyma CD only for tweeter.The tweeter is a compression driver but the midrange driver is not.
Hello Ron,Hello abeidrov,
Why don't you fly to New York, audition Diesis at Bob Visitainer, and then visit Jeff Catalano nearby in lower Manhattan at High Water Sound to hear the Cessaro Opus SE plus subwoofer. I have heard the Cessaro Opus SE plus subwoofer twice now, and I think it is a fantastic, natural-sounding system which is domestic friendly and has a small footprint, although it is a four piece system.
I also like the Diesis very much. The open baffle (Diesis) versus sealed box (Opus subwoofer) design might really reveal the biggest difference in presentation between these two great loudspeakers, with maybe the Diesis having the advantage in low frequency openness and texture, and maybe the Opus having the advantage in low frequency extension and dynamic oomph and impact
Design | Closed box design. Active with Class-D amp and DSP. |
---|---|
Bandwidth | 20 – 100Hz |
Drive Units | 2 x 13 inch reference bass drive units |
Amplification | Custom designed Class-D amplification 2 x 500W |
Recom. roomsize | 25 – 40m² per subwoofer |
Dimension | Width: 40cm (58cm including feet) Depth: 70cm Height: 80cm |
Weight | 85kg |
Thank you! What’s the difference to Opus SE?Opus 1
Modell Cessaro Horn Acoustics Opus I
Typ 2-Wege-Hornsystem
Bandbreite 40 Hz – 22.000 Hz
Basstreiber Cessaro 8-Zoll-Alnico-Antriebseinheit
Hochtöner-Treiber CNC-gefrästes Aluminiumhorn mit einem Cessaro 1-Zoll-Beryllium-Kompressionstreiber
Effizienz 97,5 dB
Impedanz 6 Ohm
Empfohlene Raumgröße 20 – 30m²
Abmessungen 30 cm x 55 cm x 125 cm (B x T x H)
Gewicht 63 kg pro Kanal
I could imagine that the horn driver and bass driver opus 1 are selected again (matched), so cessaro actually uses tad&supravox drivers. But there are also now in-house developments. I can't say anything more specific.Thank you! What’s the difference to Opus SE?
So Opus SE is the subwoofer?