Natural Sound

Not exactly. I am saying a nice performance and recording can help you quickly filter out the bad ones. That is what 95% are. This is not possible with audiophile amplified recordings was my point, they will often mislead you into thinking this sounds nice, or rather, tough to tell. Auditory template for that will be the guy's system at home which if it is based on audiophile amplified recordings, well...

When it comes to the good stuff, that can take a process of then trying in different systems and finding contexts it does well/badly in, and then after that if you cannot eliminate further you just go with the best deal or some non-sonic reason or buy them all if you have the capacity.

Yeah I have some audiophile recordings both amplified and non-amplified. Back when I first started writing about equipment I might have used some in reviews - maybe Melody Gardot or Nora Jones. They certainly can sound quite nice and the songwriting is often interesting or clever. Many buying-oriented readers expect product comparisons and you can do that with audiophile recordings, but wrt auditioning for myself, no.
 
Furthermore:

"A negative weak relationship was observed with the THD (r = - 0.42, p=0.06) and the IMD (r=-0.35, p=0.13) metrics. These results suggested negligible predictive values when utilizing THD and IMD metric in this context."

Notice it is a negative (albeit weak) relationship. Lower THD and IMD had slightly moer negative sonic preference.

"These results supported the skepticism that THD and IMD metrics were poor predictor of subjective perception of sound quality ratings."
I don’t consider 0.06 significant( 0.05)

Gedlee metric was 0.001 for SQ !
 
I am not saying you need to confirm of recordings are good or not. You can play a good recording of Diana Krall, it doesn't easily highlight if system A or component A is better or worse than B. It can show some differences, but these differences don't mean much.

With violin, piano, and orchestra, you can know what to filter out pretty quick.
For me violin is a system killer, and hard to get right
 
I am not saying you need to confirm of recordings are good or not. You can play a good recording of Diana Krall, it doesn't easily highlight if system A or component A is better or worse than B. It can show some differences, but these differences don't mean much.

With violin, piano, and orchestra, you can know what to filter out pretty quick.
Not just classical music…
 
  • Like
Reactions: christoph
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: awsmone and bonzo75
You are using the ML3 on you Soundlabs? Shocking ;) … Careful though, there are elements within WBF (Bonzo) who will swear this can’t work and might attack you for years over it…o_O

Again, why don't you ask the proper questions before speculating? I am listening to the L2 ref / M1.2Ref in the Soundlab's. But curiously, the ML3 can drive some versions of the SoundLab's better than many people can imagine.
 
Again, why don't you ask the proper questions before speculating? I am listening to the L2 ref / M1.2Ref in the Soundlab's. But curiously, the ML3 can drive some versions of the SoundLab's better than many people can imagine.
Interesting I found 1.2 very good on CLX
 
  • Like
Reactions: christoph
  • Like
Reactions: christoph
I had discussed with Herb Reichert, the idea that the recording process especially digital tends to somehow “bleach” the harmonics and a certain transfer function sees to restore the musical palette

Surely if you ask someone who prefers vinyl and a particular type of sound you get biased advice. I quote Michael Fremer describing his listening of digital recording LP:

" At around 2am, as the reverberation of the Ninth's last notes faded away, I found myself exhausted, overwhelmed, and somewhat disoriented, all in the most pleasurable way, by the most convincing illusion I've ever experienced—by a considerable margin—of having been transported from my modestly sized listening room to a concert hall (the Berlin Philharmonie). " from https://www.stereophile.com/content/sonus-faber-aida-loudspeaker.

It has been my point all the time - if you want to listen to digital stereo at its best you need an adequate system. IMHO both the XLF's and the AIda's (particularly the new Aida'II) are great candidates to such experiences.
.
 
Again, why don't you ask the proper questions before speculating? I am listening to the L2 ref / M1.2Ref in the Soundlab's. But curiously, the ML3 can drive some versions of the SoundLab's better than many people can imagine.
Did you miss the question mark? I didn't know you owned M1.2s...

Yes, SETs without global feedback can do fine on stats...they are not a risk from oscillation as there is no feedback loop for the nearly 100% of the input energy being pumped back into the amp...Stats are nasty this way because of the capacitance. I had very nice sounding Transcendent sound Beast monos that would start oscillating almost immediately on my Acoustats... My Silvaweld OTL monos were also not that happy. Of course neither of these is like Acoustats own direct drive OTLs, which worked at very high voltage directly on the panels. Same for Beveridge...
 
Surely if you ask someone who prefers vinyl and a particular type of sound you get biased advice. I quote Michael Fremer describing his listening of digital recording LP:

" At around 2am, as the reverberation of the Ninth's last notes faded away, I found myself exhausted, overwhelmed, and somewhat disoriented, all in the most pleasurable way, by the most convincing illusion I've ever experienced—by a considerable margin—of having been transported from my modestly sized listening room to a concert hall (the Berlin Philharmonie). " from https://www.stereophile.com/content/sonus-faber-aida-loudspeaker.

It has been my point all the time - if you want to listen to digital stereo at its best you need an adequate system. IMHO both the XLF's and the AIda's (particularly the new Aida'II) are great candidates to such experiences.
.

This post about Herb Reichert was not my post...I was probably commenting on that post from someone else.
 
Found another nice prophetic statement here

 
  • Like
Reactions: christoph

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu