RMAF Impressions #3:
Anyway, to rush through some final impressions,
Wavelength audio room. A flip-flop. A guy was playing his own medley CD consisting of short snatches. This was effective in other rooms I heard because it allowed different kinds of music in quick succession, but for some reason the sound quality fell flat in the Wavelength room and I was ready to write the room off. Then, they played their own stuff and the sound blossomed into huge and solemnly sweet. This is the only effective use of the plasma tweeter I have heard where it does what it is supposed to do: disappear, but convey a mysterious, airy and vast charm to the presentation. The flip-flop reminds me of the vulnerability of making any kind of final evaluations under show conditions. A big thumbs up for the Wavelength room with the Napoleon 300b amps and plasma?type tweeter.
A surprisingly effective and dynamic demo was the Emerald Physics DSP demo. This was the single speaker mounted in an open dipole baffle, and it was really good sounding and very dynamic. I never would have guessed this possible from appearance.
McIntosh room with large line array. Decent sound. Somebody needs to apply an electronic choke collar to the salesman and clamp his vocal cords after three minutes until he has played at least eight minutes of music again. I was surprised that the McIntosh sales pitch hasn't changed much since the first demo I saw as an impoverished resident in New Orleans in 1979 i.e. legacy products, will last forever, you will be willing them to your children yada yada yada. I liked the sound and the McIntosh faceplates are wonderful as usual. I rather liked the smaller line array in another room better, but I think that may just be room ergonomics.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page7 McIntosh post 61
Von Schweikert room: much better than my impressions from CAS 2013 with the biggie speakers, but I was dragging when I heard it and kind of dragged in and dragged out again.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread von sch. post 27
Wells Audio: I did not hear this, but this was the system at CAS 2013 that I thought was one of the bargain systems. 90 to 95 percent of the YG Acoustics/Ypsilon sound at a fraction of the cost in a small to medium size space.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page4 Wells post 35
Triode Audio:
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page5 triode post 41
For the second time, one of the best sounds at the show, really excellent. I did notice, however, that the VU meters were showing the power was pushing out to the limits of the amp, so I don't know how these would do with Led Zeppelin.
D'agostino Room:
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page5 d'agostino post 46 Not terribly impressive when I was in there, for the second time at a show.
TAD: I heard two demos, not quite up to muster from my expectations but not bad.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page3 TAD post 22
Wynn/Reimyo: I really liked these expensive speakers. Moderate size to the soundstage, but intensely sweet tone and outstanding quality overall. A classical music lover's dream, but pricey.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page8 wynn/Reimyo post 75
Volti/Border Patrol: One of the true gems of the show, I loved this one. At about 16K for the speakers/woofer and 16k for the amp with power supplies, a high end bargain. When you consider that for every 10 db of dynamic capability that you double to quintuple the price of a competent stereo system at least, here is a system you can put in almost any room with unlimited dynamic capability and open, sweet, detailed sound. Another DHT/horn system that I could love.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page7 volti post 69
Vivid: Small system placed in a corner, no less. I have heard four Vivid demos so far, and liked all of them. Quick melt into listening rather than evaluation. I played the same music that I played at the Focal demo, and no, it didn't sound as good, but it is much less expensive and very involving, nonetheless. I would say Vivid has really got the tonal balance thing correct and they seem to play with equal finesse with both solid state and tubes. John Atkinson was in the room, and he and O'Hanlon were doing an Irish brogue/ slightly Scottish British accent thing while discussing O"Hanlon's corrupted digital files.
I have even forgiven Vivid speakers for looking like variations of plastic vaginas and semicircular canals.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page2 vivid post 13
Saskia Room: Everybody loved this one, with the flea powered 50 tube amp, the vintage high efficiency speakers and the estimable and beautiful Saskia turntable. I heard it twice and Fremer was there the second time with his Go Pro camera as they rushed about getting things right for him. I really liked this sound as well, a great variant on the slightly "raw" but utterly charming DHT type sound.
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showthread.php?12355-Steve-s-RMAF-2013-Photo-Thread/page6 saskia post 52
King Audio, Shaker Audio, Kaplan Cables
This was a great Stat demo. Big imaging, clear, and best of all, dynamic with great bass and no subwoofer assistance. Color me impressed.
I heard many more, but some I can't remember, and some negatives. I played one of my own pieces on the big Tannoy/Vac system. and barely recognized it, which serves as a reminder for the variations of execution and taste in high end audio.
I thought there were a lot of excellent systems to hear, and I didn't hear them all. I wish I had heard the Soundlabs and the Vapor audio stuff at the Hyatt, but no time or energy in my two days.
Overall, the show did what they should do: act as a social gathering point for audiophiles, elevate some devices above expectations, lower some below expectations. and explore completely novel areas of audio that I didn't know were even there. Only problem is, it takes probably twice the time to digest it all, and I missed a lot even trying to motor through.