I think there is a law against using a tweak more expensive than your TT ! Marc got charged 3 times already !I think it does!
But Kedar says the Dalby Lignum Vitae V8 has magical (mystical?) sonic properties, so I had to try it!
I think there is a law against using a tweak more expensive than your TT ! Marc got charged 3 times already !I think it does!
But Kedar says the Dalby Lignum Vitae V8 has magical (mystical?) sonic properties, so I had to try it!
My pleasure, Peter!
Compared to our private discussions, I feel like you are pulling punches here. I feel like you might be restraining yourself from reporting that the sound seems "unbalanced" to you.
It is music with which I am a bit more familiar, but really, it is instruments and the type of music I hear live. I agree with your assessment of where the "center of gravity" is in terms of tonal balance/frequency response, although I would not describe it in those terms myself.
I am scheduled to receive an in-home demo of two PSI AVAAs on April 21.
I have ordered two ASC 20-TT-HH TubeTraps with a requested peak absorption at 55Hz to 60Hz.
It's time to shave down that bump!
Looks impressive........ So what does it bring to the "TABLE"........A new (pre-owned) tweak arrived today!
Say hello to a Dalby Lignum Vitae V8 record weight.
View attachment 107533
But I'm not sure the bearing or the motor in the Denon can handle the weight of this thing.
I think there is a law against using a tweak more expensive than your TT ! Marc got charged 3 times already !
or possessing them… If you spool your tapes backwards is there now some hidden message, like red room, red room Ron…
BTW, my more frequently played Beethoven Piano Fourth is the Perahia-Concertgebouw-Haitink.
Looks impressive........ So what does it bring to the "TABLE"........
...and costs 10 times the price of the Denon and HanaThat thing looks like it weights more than the turntable Ron !
This range is where my Odeon horns also deliver a lot of realism…also the midbass drive and punchI hear David's Bionors as achieving the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think maximizes realism and natural sound on instruments. Karen Sumner has advocated for getting right this critical 100Hz to 1,000Hz region. I have not heard a dynamic driver in a box loudspeaker or a planar loudspeaker that can achieve the overall realism -- the power, weight, energy and body -- on instruments that I hear from David's system.
l know that David believes that his system does not roll off treble frequencies, and I know that you believe that your system does not roll off treble frequencies. I don't know what a external microphone and frequency analyzer would reveal.
I know you believe that these systems are not rolling off treble frequencies; rather, you believe that many contemporary systems emphasize or exaggerate treble frequencies. I honestly don't know which is correct. I would answer this question with measurements. Absent objective frequency response measurements of different kinds of systems I am not sure we will ever be able to come to an agreement on whether Bionors are rolling off treble frequencies or contemporary loudspeakers are exaggerating treble frequencies based on theory and subjective listening.
Whatever Bionors (and, I am sure, Vitavoxes) are doing objectively, there is no doubt to me that, subjectively, they sound different than, and subjectively they have a different tonal balance than, and subjectively they have a different sonic center of gravity than, Alsyvox, Magico, Wilson, Marten, Tidal, YG, Zellaton, and most other contemporary loudspeakers which celebrate the "frequency extremes."
I love the sound of David's system, and I am sure I would love the sound of your system and conceptually similar systems (I like the sound of Jeff Tyo's system) for piano and violin and guitar and other string instruments and brass instruments -- for classical and for jazz. I have posted and said numerous times that if my primary musical genre interest were classical or jazz there is no doubt I would have a horn-type system, and very possibly a vintage horn-type system. (The current production Destination Audio Vista and Malta, and Viva Audio Master Horn and Tune Audio Avaton look promising as contemporary candidates that might also achieve the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think achieves realism and natural sound on instruments.)
Separately, but relatedly, I believe that David's Bionors and the Tannoy Westminster and the two-way JBL Hartsfield (Jeff has the three-way), while achieving the upper bass/lower midrange sonic center of gravity that I like, nonetheless leave me with an odd feeling that something is missing in the treble frequencies. Emotional engagement-wise and subjective sonic preference-wise I don't miss whatever I sense is missing. (I don't care that something is missing.) But I do sense that something is missing.
I am working on nudging down the sonic center of gravity of my system. But fundamentally I am solving for a different sonic suspension of disbelief equation than you are.
I am not trying to maximize naturalness and suspension of disbelief on acoustic instruments. I am trying to maximize naturalness and suspension of disbelief for a vocalist singing to me in my listening room. And for that, to my ears, the openness and transparency of planars gives me more towards believability on vocals than I lose from sacrificing the upper bass/lower midrange sonic center of gravity I enjoy so much, and which I find maximizes naturalness and tonal density and weight, on acoustic instruments.
I believe that no loudspeaker is perfect, and that every speaker -- no matter the size and no matter the cost -- requires thoughtful analysis and conscious, unavoidable compromises.
Nice punLooks impressive........ So what does it bring to the "TABLE"........
I hear David's Bionors as achieving the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think maximizes realism and natural sound on instruments. Karen Sumner has advocated for getting right this critical 100Hz to 1,000Hz region. I have not heard a dynamic driver in a box loudspeaker or a planar loudspeaker that can achieve the overall realism -- the power, weight, energy and body -- on instruments that I hear from David's system.
l know that David believes that his system does not roll off treble frequencies, and I know that you believe that your system does not roll off treble frequencies. I don't know what a external microphone and frequency analyzer would reveal.
I know you believe that these systems are not rolling off treble frequencies; rather, you believe that many contemporary systems emphasize or exaggerate treble frequencies. I honestly don't know which is correct. I would answer this question with measurements. Absent objective frequency response measurements of different kinds of systems I am not sure we will ever be able to come to an agreement on whether Bionors are rolling off treble frequencies or contemporary loudspeakers are exaggerating treble frequencies based on theory and subjective listening.
Whatever Bionors (and, I am sure, Vitavoxes) are doing objectively, there is no doubt to me that, subjectively, they sound different than, and subjectively they have a different tonal balance than, and subjectively they have a different sonic center of gravity than, Alsyvox, Magico, Wilson, Marten, Tidal, YG, Zellaton, and most other contemporary loudspeakers which celebrate the "frequency extremes."
I love the sound of David's system, and I am sure I would love the sound of your system and conceptually similar systems (I like the sound of Jeff Tyo's system) for piano and violin and guitar and other string instruments and brass instruments -- for classical and for jazz. I have posted and said numerous times that if my primary musical genre interest were classical or jazz there is no doubt I would have a horn-type system, and very possibly a vintage horn-type system. (The current production Destination Audio Vista and Malta, and Viva Audio Master Horn and Tune Audio Avaton look promising as contemporary candidates that might also achieve the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think achieves realism and natural sound on instruments.)
Separately, but relatedly, I believe that David's Bionors and the Tannoy Westminster and the two-way JBL Hartsfield (Jeff has the three-way), while achieving the upper bass/lower midrange sonic center of gravity that I like, nonetheless leave me with an odd feeling that something is missing in the treble frequencies. Emotional engagement-wise and subjective sonic preference-wise I don't miss whatever I sense is missing. (I don't care that something is missing.) But I do sense that something is missing.
I am working on nudging down the sonic center of gravity of my system. But fundamentally I am solving for a different sonic suspension of disbelief equation than you are.
I am not trying to maximize naturalness and suspension of disbelief on acoustic instruments. I am trying to maximize naturalness and suspension of disbelief for a vocalist singing to me in my listening room. And for that, to my ears, the openness and transparency of planars gives me more towards believability on vocals than I lose from sacrificing the upper bass/lower midrange sonic center of gravity I enjoy so much, and which I find maximizes naturalness and tonal density and weight, on acoustic instruments.
I believe that no loudspeaker is perfect, and that every speaker -- no matter the size and no matter the cost -- requires thoughtful analysis and conscious, unavoidable compromises.
All transducer designs begin to roll off as the output approaches the upper frequency extremes , varying in how rapidly and by how much across disparate designs , what makes the Vitavox and Bioner miraculously immune to this physics related phenomenon?
Ron - very interesting comments. And I have to say, I think that is partly where Gryphon's balance is coming from...there is a foundational solidity and realism that they deliver in that lower center of gravity you refer to. While it should not be at the expense of other areas, this foundational element is special if you hear it and like it. (I do.)I hear David's Bionors as achieving the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think maximizes realism and natural sound on instruments. Karen Sumner has advocated for getting right this critical 100Hz to 1,000Hz region. I have not heard a dynamic driver in a box loudspeaker or a planar loudspeaker that can achieve the overall realism -- the power, weight, energy and body -- on instruments that I hear from David's system.
...I love the sound of David's system, and I am sure I would love the sound of your system and conceptually similar systems (I like the sound of Jeff Tyo's system) for piano and violin and guitar and other string instruments and brass instruments -- for classical and for jazz. I have posted and said numerous times that if my primary musical genre interest were classical or jazz there is no doubt I would have a horn-type system, and very possibly a vintage horn-type system. (The current production Destination Audio Vista and Malta, and Viva Audio Master Horn and Tune Audio Avaton look promising as contemporary candidates that might also achieve the upper bass/lower midrange center of gravity which I think achieves realism and natural sound on instruments.)...
...and costs 10 times the price of the Denon and Hana
This ^Peter believes neither his Vitavox nor David's Bionar system roll off treble frequencies
This ^