By being a non meat eater for 50+ years I will never look at my speakers the same. It will always be the sound of cows.I prefer the fast light footed dynamics of hi eff, rather than trying to squeeze the cow through the meat grinder...
By being a non meat eater for 50+ years I will never look at my speakers the same. It will always be the sound of cows.I prefer the fast light footed dynamics of hi eff, rather than trying to squeeze the cow through the meat grinder...
looks like some high budget systems that were not your cup of tea
I think you´re home free with MLsBy being a non meat eater for 50+ years I will never look at my speakers the same. It will always be the sound of cows.
It seems to me, members when discussing why they like a new componant or a system, in general look for similar attributes.
Low Distortion
Good dynamics
No grain or hash
No fatigue
Cant pinpoint the speaker
Wide and tall soundstage
Full frequency bass and treble extension.
A relatively flat frequenxy response.
These are some of the most obvous attributes we aspire towards. I did not say Natural or organic or close to the real event. Those are too nebulous a term.
If I were to listen to a system that excelled at these basic attributes and it sounded "musical" to me, I would assume most others would too. I would share with others it was a great system. A favorite of mine.
I am not sure how you come to this conclusion this is not how Ron came to the list. I don't think I have seen Ron break each system down for what it does. But that does not mean his perception of what he feels he and.others would like does not encompass a system that has attributes as such. But that is something Ron needs to tell us.Sorry, this is different. You are listing a system with great properties and saying you liked it and it sounded musical to you. Then you should, of course, state you like it and recommend it to others for listening.
Why would you like a system that lacked many attributes you desired, or had an attribute you hated? What you are saying is the obvious. That is not what Ron said.
Thats an example of a room someone might walk into and your perceptions are profoundly shaped by what you see. Not necessarily what you hear.Speaking of a special room
HIFI RETRO on Instagram: "HIFI HEAVEN #hifi #hifiporn #audio #audioporn #vinyl #hifiretro #vinylcollection #vinyladdict #hornspeakers #hifivintage #turntable #listeningroom #highendaudio #hifisetup #amplifier #tubeamp #vintageamp #audiophileroom
hifi.retro on March 8, 2024: "HIFI HEAVEN #hifi #hifiporn #audio #audioporn #vinyl #hifiretro #vinylcollection #vinyladdict #hornspeakers #hifivintage #turntable #listeningroom #highendaudio #hifisetup #amplifier #tubeamp #vintageamp #audiophileroom #audiophile #hifiretro #vintagehifi...www.instagram.com
I prefer the fast light footed dynamics of hi eff, rather than trying to squeeze the cow through the meat grinder...
I am not sure how you come to this conclusion this is not how Ron came to the list. I don't think I have seen Ron break each system down for what it does. But that does not mean his perception of what he feels he and.others would like does not encompass a system that has attributes as such. But that is something Ron needs to tell us.
I apologize up front if Ron clearly stated what each system does and how that influenced his rating. Maybe I missed that.
That's the point. If it would be just Ron's opinions on Ron's favorite rooms, there would be no objections. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, as you say.
The objections arose from extending the term "favorite" to something not applicable, as discussed.
not sure that Ron holds himself apart or above others (arrogates?) in his knowledge of 'other's' preferences. although he likely sees himself as more unique in his personal preferences, hence is aware more of the offset/correction for where he is not mainstream in his preferences. acknowledges where other might go. so adjusts for his differences; likely his rough edges have been ground down.. he sees a bigger picture. nothing new for him.exactly. Each is entitled to his own opinion about his personal preferences. It is when someone arrrogates fore-knowledge of other's opinions that it becomes presumptive of the authority to make such judgements.
not sure that Ron holds himself apart or above others (arrogates?) in his knowledge of 'other's' preferences. although he likely sees himself as more unique in his personal preferences, hence is aware more of the offset/correction for where he is not mainstream in his preferences. acknowledges where other might go. so adjusts for his differences. he sees a bigger picture. nothing new for him.
but nothing arrogant about it comparatively. not that feathers are not ruffled. he has not come up with an acronym for mainstream.
friends I most often listen with have somewhat different sonic compasses than myself. and over the years I can recognize systems that appeal more to them, or systems they might not care for as much as I do. and we acknowledge systems that might please either of us and value those attributes even if not quite one our personal priorities. over time we seem to be more alike in our preferences, which started out just with a respect for the differences. we evolve.
Well summarised.LOL! To add the keelhauling, I doubt that Ron would ever visit a DIY guy's basement irregular montage or 'ugly' system even if it sounded great. Favorites will be 1. Clean and orderly as a showroom and visually neat or pretty 2. Bigga Badda 3. Expensivo 4. Consisting mostly if not all of currently commercially available brand name top end merchandise 5. Antiseptically correct to the extent it is possible to be so 6. Polite and diplomatic to said systems 7. Tilted toward the mutual admiration society buddy systems of high end audio 8. Geared toward 'accepted' mainstream audio commercial mythologies
you are not reading between the lines correctly then. For me, a lot of it is cotton Candy (cheap sugar), and very few those areHowever, trying to extract meaningful advice is like untangling a whirling dervish in a cotton candy factory.
I doubt that Ron would ever visit a DIY guy's basement irregular montage or 'ugly' system even if it sounded great.