Well, the people at the Audio Science Review Forum seem to believe that their cherished measurements strongly correlate with "objectively" better or worse .
I would be more careful with the word correlation. As far as I have read for them everything sounds similar, except poor measuring gear that is not worth listening ...
But then, the term "science" in their forum's title is a cheap parody of the real thing.
Many people there admit that there is no audio science behind their many graphs and thresholds - they are just guidelines for people who appreciate measurement. Anyway their hobby is very different from ours.