we spend $50k-$150k+ on our digital signal paths.......so if there is low hanging fruit for comparative pennies......pick and eat the damn fruit.
+1
while i have a lot of spaghetti, time and LPS in my digital network, i have never been happy, as an engineer or audiophile, with our lack of understanding of what was going on with digital, hardware, switches, routers, LAN, cables and amazingly software.
it has been very clear to me that we didn't know what the hell was going on technically, but i was happy to make changes that were clearly audible advances in SQ, even as the "WTF" hypotheses were being formulated by the earliest experimenters/designers/DIYers. in my experience, the first person i ran across who proposed such heresy was someone on the Logitech forums (about 10 years ago?) who argued that software parameter changes to the Logitech Touch improved SQ (to the intense derision of almost everyone)
Emile et al give me hope that this can in fact be understood and optimized to a level previously unsuspected.
i trust, based on past performance, that the network will become increasingly less critical.
i'm on the bus!
by the way, i was talking to a friend who is both an audiophile and engineer and we were reminiscing about the day, about 25 years ago?, when we "solved" the digital problem on an airplane napkin--------read the data into a buffer and read it out with really clean clocking, problem solved! as i liked to tell my classes after proving something on the blackboard, "details are left as an exercize for the student"