I’m going to have to find a way to send you some of those PureDSD direct from tape transfers, some of these go back to the 50s. It’s just a different experience.
Emile, is this classical music for the most part or jazz too?
I’m going to have to find a way to send you some of those PureDSD direct from tape transfers, some of these go back to the 50s. It’s just a different experience.
Since the TAS driver and now the Taiko Audio USB board are up and running, I find that my digital side is so good now that for my ears it becomes impossible to tell one hires format from another when the same song is played. For my ears the digital we are hearing now is so good that I have ceased looking at what format the file is as they just ALL sound so damn goodi'm open to where this might go. i am hearing 'vinyl' like inner musical reveals in familiar digitally sourced recordings for sure. spooky good stuff.
will a voice or instrument or venue come alive (suspension of disbelief) in the realm of my better (top 2/3rds of 8000 records) analog based vinyl playback? not yet hearing that. this stuff is never any sort of absolute/always thing.
and it makes sense that digital evolves to the point where the native recording format and quality become dominant in performance. and that digital playback equals vinyl for those. that is what seemingly i'm hearing now on those recordings. OTOH the analog sourced recordings in vinyl have both the format advantage (IMHO) plus the methods and creative assets used during that era as advantages. the recording process is always the most important thing. Thursday night i had a local friend over for a fun session. we did start with some digital (did not yet have the USB card installed) for a few cuts, but then it was all 45-50+ year old recordings in vinyl. that's how that mostly goes.
Since the TAS driver and now the Taiko Audio USB board are up and running, I find that my digital side is so good now that for my ears it becomes impossible to tell one hires format from another when the same song is played. For my ears the digital we are hearing now is so good that I have ceased looking at what format the file is as they just ALL sound so damn good
As someone suggested, it will be interesting revisiting your thoughts in 2 weeks as the sound just gets better daily
Vinyl sourced from digital hardly stands a chance anymore. And that is a pretty big milestone for digital. I already lost interest of buying vinyls sourced from digital and look for vinyls sourced from the analog master tapes or as close as possible to that
I agree 100%. I would only add that even pre-Extreme, let alone Extreme+TAS+Taiko USB card, mastering and engineering really mattered for digital just as it always has for vinyl. Even high resolution digital is no guarantee of great sound quality, and I've stopped being surprised when a CD rip sounds incredible, with long, trailing cymbal sounds and pure HF reproduction, long the bete noir of Redbook reproduction.We are getting to the point where the recording and mastering matters, not whether it's digital or analog. I still have my 5% of top vinyl records that sound better than any digital I've heard, but the difference is getting smaller and smaller.
Emile, this looks like High Definition Tape Transfers (HDTT) statement about their analog tape to DSD releases. I agree, the sound quality, naturalness and vinyl-like -- or maybe I should say, tape-like -- sound on many of their releases is superb.Not a specific genre.
OUR DSD RELEASES WHICH ARE MARKED "PURE DSD" ORIGINATE FROM A DSD MASTERING WITH NO PCM EDITING.
DSD cannot be edited, any DSD release which has been edited has been converted to PCM, edited and converted back again.
However, though I don't claim to be a mastering engineer, I believe the statement about DSD only being able to be edited in the PCM domain is incorrect. I believe the Sony Sonoma system and Pyramix both allow editing in the DSD domain.
since i've had a 'bit-perfect' dac the idea of finding and playing the native file has become my focus, and so far have not found an exception to take me another direction. redbook native can be nearly as good (for simple music) as any other, the recording quality/purity being a more dominant factor than the choice of format.With these modern digital chains, the notion of what makes a technically great recording/master is definitely evolving. More and more, I'm leaning into masterings with as little digital processing as possible.
You're welcome, Emile. I think what Bob at HDTT is referring to is that he doesn't do any editing of his tape-to-DSD transfers (the ones with his PureDSD label) to correct dropouts, or to digitally splice several different tapes of the same release together to get one perfect transfer. So the HDTT releases are as-is, sometimes with a dropout here or there and sometimes with some very low-level tape hiss.Thank you Steve, wasn’t aware, I guess we just have to trust the “PureDSD” label at face value then.
As a dear friend of mine is fond of saying: “If you’re not careful, you might learn something!”Hi Steve,
That is correct information about DAW's that can edit DSD. However the devil is in the details. I was involved with the first direct to DSD recordings made in the US in 1997. When Sony had just introduced the technology and Tom Jung of DMP Records made the first direct to DSD recording at Ambient Recording Co.
Both those DAW's change DSD to PCM (DXD) in order to make edits and or process the signal in any way. They will playback pure DSD as long as the files are not manipulated. Engineers can keep it pure DSD by just trimming the top and bottom of a track where just the trims would be converted from DSD to PCM and back. The body of the track staying pure DSD.
DSD can be an amazing sounding format. It always seemed to me to be closer to analog sounding then PCM.
There are very aware recording studios / mastering engineers, like Mark Conese: https://www.markconesedesign.com/
Emile, I have their first two albums. When you say it was mastered w Extreme, you mean that's the means it was played back? Or was Extreme in the middle of the mastering chain?