Emile, I'm not recommend "stacking" either.
I hope this does not look like I’m seeking an argument, I’m really not, but if you had crossed that bridge to spend USD 5200 I would go all the way and get the full monty at USD 6900
Emile, I'm not recommend "stacking" either.
Communication between Switch and server is constant, although you can play files that are on the server directly from the server to the DAC via USB. As I do not have Extreme I will not say that Extreme is not immune to the noise of the switch (although I would be surprised) but in my Melco it is very clear. Change the quality of the switch's power supply or change a commercial switch to a modified one or "Audiophile Switch” and you will immediately notice the change in SQ, even if it transmits local files.
It does indeed affect both streaming and local file playback.
I shouldn’t have said that a switch would have no effect since there is always communication going on but can you say how big an effect an external switch could have when you are playing local files? Do you think it could be significant?
Hugely significant. Believe me I have done many tests.
Hugely significant. Believe me I have done many tests.
Yes but not that huge with the Extreme, though I’m starting to repeat myself here.
Yes, Steve's terminology is off. Ethernet can be done over copper or fiber. And funnily enough, with MSB DACs, you can do USB via fiber as well
Emile, I'm not recommend "stacking" either.
The poll is just that, a poll. How many of those have MSB DACs and have tried the Renderer w/ SoTM (or other switches)?
USB is by far the most prevalent connection method, and I know that. That doesn't make it automatically the best.
My music is on 16 TB of internal cards of the Extreme so perhaps that is also affecting my commentsThe whole subject of tweaks is complicated because there are SO many different configurations.
For example, if you have all your music on the internal Extreme drives and use USB I don’t see how a switch would make a difference. It would only affect music streamed from Tidal/Qobuz. But if the music was external then it could make a difference.
This is exactly my experience with various Innuos servers. Anything that removes or isolates noise from the network supply to the server, has a direct affect on the server’s output, regardless where the files originate, local or remote. It seems that as long as the server is connected to the network, network noise will find its way to the server unless countermeasures are implemented. .Communication between Switch and server is constant, although you can play files that are on the server directly from the server to the DAC via USB. As I do not have Extreme I will not say that Extreme is not immune to the noise of the switch (although I would be surprised) but in my Melco it is very clear. Change the quality of the switch's power supply or change a commercial switch to a modified one or "Audiophile Switch” and you will immediately notice the change in SQ, even if it transmits local files.
Why not just unplug any network cables from the back of the Extreme when listening to locally stored files?
Why not just unplug any network cables from the back of the Extreme when listening to locally stored files?
I noticed a small difference in sound quality when I took the network cable out of the Extreme when playing files from PCIe drives . It is why I am interested in trying optimal fibre optics - I currently just have an optical link using TPlink media converters before the listening room Netgear 108 router .
It is not even that big a difference:
Emile, what is the biggest diference: the switch or a Daiza under SGM and dac?
Curiously I find that the USB cable changes more the sound of my system than any router modification I have tried. I am using the Intona Reference but after sampling a few other cables (unfortunately I could not keep them time enough to get a definitive opinion) I would like to find an USB cable with a more "liquid" balance in the treble, like moving from the Audio Research Ref 40 to the GAT2 preamplfier.