FWIW I'd agree with gapless being higher priority than scrubbing. I'm a PGGB -er who is waiting to see if it will end up being really worth it once NSM, Router, BPS, TACDD are out, and as non PGGB already sounds so good..I am in agreement with @austinpop here. If there is a business reason, or a technical build reason, why scrubbing should come before gapless, I understand the current prioritization. However, based on my understanding of user behavior (and of course my personal preference based on how I listen to music), I would put gapless much higher than scrubbing. In my case, I listen to a lot of live concerts and gaps between tracks is a buzz kill. For those using pggb (not me), which breaks a single large music file into 2gb segments, this must be intolerable since it adds gaps inside of tracks, not just between separate tracks.
I suspect this comes down to local versus streaming, and if streaming is a much higher priority than playing local files, then scrubbing provides a benefit for all streaming users (and maybe they are the majority?).
If there is no compelling business or technical sequencing issue, please consider moving gapless up to the highest priority after NSM.
YMMV
Last edited: